| Literature DB >> 33810316 |
Darko P Ašanin1, Sanja Skaro Bogojevic2, Franc Perdih3, Tina P Andrejević4, Dusan Milivojevic2, Ivana Aleksic2, Jasmina Nikodinovic-Runic2, Biljana Đ Glišić4, Iztok Turel3, Miloš I Djuran5.
Abstract
Three new silver(I) complexes [Ag(NO3)(tia)(H2O)]n (Ag1), [Ag(CF3SO3)(1,8-naph)]n (Ag2) and [Ag2(1,8-naph)2(H2O)1.2](PF6)2 (Ag3), where tia is thianthrene and 1,8-naph is 1,8-naphthyridine, were synthesized and structurally characterized by different spectroscopic and electrochemical methods and their crystal structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Their antimicrobial potential was evaluated against four bacterial and three Candida species, and the obtained results revealed that these complexes showed significant activity toward the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus, Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the investigated Candida species with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in the range 1.56-7.81 μg/mL. On the other hand, tia and 1,8-naph ligands were not active against the investigated strains, suggesting that their complexation with Ag(I) ion results in the formation of antimicrobial compounds. Moreover, low toxicity of the complexes was detected by in vivo model Caenorhabditis elegans. The interaction of the complexes with calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was studied to evaluate their binding affinity towards these biomolecules for possible insights into the mode of antimicrobial activity. The binding affinity of Ag1-3 to BSA was higher than that for DNA, indicating that proteins could be more favorable binding sites for these complexes in comparison to the nucleic acids.Entities:
Keywords: 1,8-naphthyridine; Caenorhabditis elegans; DNA/BSA interaction; antimicrobial activity; silver(I) complexes; thianthrene
Year: 2021 PMID: 33810316 PMCID: PMC8037121 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26071871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Schematic presentation of the reaction route for the synthesis of silver(I) complexes with tia (thianthrene) (a) and 1,8-naph (1,8-naphthyridine) (b). Numeration of atoms in the ligands is in accordance with IUPAC recommendations for fused ring systems and used for NMR characterization of complexes Ag1–3.
Figure 1Crystal structures of complexes Ag1–3. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. For Ag3, only one anion is presented for clarity.
Figure 2Hydrogen bonded belt in Ag1. Hydrogen bonds are drawn by dashed blue lines.
Selected bond distances (Å) and bond angles (°) for complexes Ag1–3.
| Distance (Å) | Ag1 | Distance (Å) | Ag2 | Ag3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag1–O1 | 2.360(2) | Ag1–O1 | 2.555(2) | 2.449(4) | |
| Ag1–O2 | 2.328(2) | Ag1···O2 ii | 2.645(2) | – | |
| Ag1–S1 | 2.6198(7) | Ag1–N1 | 2.200(2) | 2.186(3) | |
| Ag1–S2 i | 2.6747(8) | Ag1–N2 i | 2.218(2) | 2.184(3) | |
| Ag1···Ag1 i | 2.7871(5) | 2.7235(6) | |||
|
|
| ||||
| O1–Ag1–O2 | 108.07(7) | O1–Ag1–N1 | 112.75(8) | 91.94(14) | |
| O1–Ag1–S1 | 105.18(5) | O1–Ag1–N2 i | 82.66(8) | 96.78(14) | |
| O2–Ag1–S1 | 124.24(5) | N1–Ag1–N2 i | 164.29(10) | 169.76(12) | |
| O1–Ag1–S2 i | 103.56(5) | ||||
| O2–Ag1–S2 i | 121.54(5) | ||||
| S1–Ag1–S2 i | 91.44(2) |
Symmetry codes for Ag1: (i) 1 + x, y, z; for Ag2: (i) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 – z; (ii) 1 − x, 2 − y, 1 – z; for Ag3: (i) 1 − x, 1 − y, 2 − z.
Hydrogen-bonding interactions in complexes Ag1–3.
| D–H···A | D–H (Å) | H···A (Å) | D···A (Å) | D–H···A (o) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| O1–H1A···O3 i | 0.820(18) | 2.007(18) | 2.825(3) | 175(3) |
| O1–H1B···O4 ii | 0.82(3) | 2.06(3) | 2.849(3) | 160(3) |
| C3–H3···O1 iii | 0.95 | 2.50 | 3.428(3) | 166.6 |
| C5–H5···O2 iv | 0.95 | 2.55 | 3.202(3) | 125.6 |
| C5–H5···O4 v | 0.95 | 2.51 | 3.279(4) | 137.8 |
|
| ||||
| C1–H1···O2 ii | 0.95 | 2.43 | 3.169(4) | 134 |
| C7–H7···F2 iii | 0.95 | 2.46 | 3.301(4) | 148 |
| C8–H8···O3 iv | 0.95 | 2.40 | 3.299(4) | 157 |
|
| ||||
| O1–H1A···F1 | 0.91 | 2.12 | 2.787(7) | 129.0 |
| O1–H1A···F1 ii | 0.91 | 2.11 | 2.810(7) | 133.0 |
| O1–H1B···F5 | 0.92 | 2.49 | 3.121(6) | 126.6 |
| O1–H1B···F5 iii | 0.92 | 2.51 | 3.084(6) | 121.2 |
| C1–H1···O1 | 0.95 | 2.45 | 3.152(6) | 130.3 |
| C8–H8···F5 iv | 0.95 | 2.52 | 3.141(5) | 123.0 |
Symmetry codes for Ag1: (i) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (ii) 2 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (iii) −1 + x, y, z; (iv) 1 − x, ½ + y, 3/2 − z; (v) 2 − x, ½ + y, 3/2 – z; for Ag2: (ii) 1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z; (iii) −1 + x, −1 + y, z; (iv) x, −1 + y, z; for Ag3: (ii) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (iii) 2 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (iv) −1 + x, y, 1 + z.
Figure 3Polynuclear chain in Ag2.
Figure 4Cyclic voltammograms of the silver(I) complexes Ag1–3 at GC electrode in DMSO and 0.1 M TBAHP as a supporting electrolyte with a scan rate of 50 mV/s. The conditions are given as follows: Ebegin = −2.0 V, Eend = 2.0 V and Estep = 0.002 V.
Positions and redox reactions associated with observed cathodic and anodic peaks in cyclic voltammograms of complexes Ag1–3 recorded at GC electrode in DMSO and 0.1 M TBAHP as a supporting electrolyte with a scan rate of 50 mV/s.
| Silver(I) Complex | Oxidation Process (E, | Reduction Processes (E, | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ag(I)→Ag(II) | Ag(II)→Ag(I) | Ag(I)→Ag(0) | |
|
| +1.25 | −0.43 | −1.26 |
|
| +1.38 | −0.27 | −0.92 |
|
| +1.12 | −0.19 | -0.82 |
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC, µg/mL and µM) and cytotoxicity against healthy human fibroblasts MRC-5 (IC50, µg/mL and µM) of Ag1–3 complexes and ligands against fungal and bacterial strains. Silver(I) complexes with 1,5-naphthyridine (1,5-naph) and silver(I) sulfadiazine (AgSD) were given for comparative purposes [30,31]. NT = Non tested. Reproduced with permissions from refs. [30,31]. Copyright (2019) Elsevier.
| Compound | tia | Ag1 | 1,8-naph | Ag2 | Ag3 | 1,5-naph | [Ag(NO3) | [Ag(CF3COO) | [Ag(CF3SO3) | AgSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| µg/mL | >200 | 7.81 | >200 | 3.91 | 3.91 | >250 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 1.25 | 3.6 |
| µM | >925 | 19.3 | >1537 | 10.1 | 5.0 | >1921 | 10.3 | 8.8 | 3.2 | 10 | |
|
| µg/mL | >200 | 1.56 | >200 | 1.56 | 1.56 | >250 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 1.25 | 0.89 |
| µM | >925 | 3.6 | >1537 | 4.0 | 1.0 | >1921 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 2.5 | |
|
| µg/mL | >200 | 3.91 | >200 | 3.91 | 7.81 | >250 | 6.25 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.89 |
| µM | >925 | 9.7 | >1537 | 10.1 | 9.9 | >1921 | 20.8 | 8.8 | 6.5 | 2.5 | |
|
| µg/mL | >250 | 3.91 | >250 | 7.81 | 7.81 | >250 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 27 |
| µM | >1157 | 9.7 | >1921 | 20.2 | 9.9 | >1921 | 167 | 142 | 65 | 75 | |
|
| µg/mL | >250 | 15.62 | >250 | 15.62 | 125 | >250 | NT | NT | NT | NT |
| µM | >1157 | 38.6 | >1921 | 40.4 | 160 | >1921 | NT | NT | NT | NT | |
|
| µg/mL | >250 | 15.62 | >250 | 31.25 | 15.62 | >250 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 7.14 |
| µM | >1157 | 38.6 | >1921 | 80.7 | 19.8 | >1921 | 83 | 36 | 32 | 20 | |
| µg/mL | >200 | 6.25 | >200 | 3.13 | 3.13 | >250 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 8.93 | |
| µM | >925 | 15.5 | >1537 | 8.1 | 4.0 | >1921 | 83 | 71 | 65 | 25 | |
| µg/mL | >250 | 3.91 | >250 | 3.91 | 3.91 | >250 | NT | NT | NT | NT | |
| µM | >1157 | 9.7 | >1921 | 10.1 | 5.0 | >1921 | NT | NT | NT | NT | |
| MRC-5 cells | µg/mL | >100 | 4.25 | >100 | 3.75 | 3.65 | >250 | NT | NT | NT | 3.6 |
| µM | >462 | 10.5 | >768 | 9.7 | 4.6 | >1921 | NT | NT | NT | 10 |
Figure 5Survival of C. elegans in the presence of silver(I) complexes Ag1–3 alongside tia and 1,8-naph ligands (%, average ± the SD) after 48 h of treatment.
Figure 6Fluorescence emission spectra of BSA in the presence of an increasing amount of Ag1 complex. The arrow shows the intensity changes upon the gradual addition of the complex. Inserted graph: Stern-Volmer plots of F0/F vs. complex.
Values of the binding constants of complexes Ag1–3 with BSA.
| Complex | Hypochromism (%) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| (1.56 ± 0.01) × 105 | 78.0 | 1.56 × 1013 | 3.05 × 106 | 1.41 |
|
| (1.34 ± 0.01) × 104 | 70.2 | 1.34 × 1012 | 2.88 × 104 | 1.12 |
|
| (2.70 ± 0.05) × 104 | 68.7 | 2.70 × 1012 | 6.08 × 105 | 1.37 |
Figure 7(a) Fluorescence emission spectra of EthBr–DNA system in the presence of an increasing amount of Ag2 complex. The arrow shows the intensity changes upon the gradual addition of the complex. Inserted graph: Stern-Volmer plots of F0/F vs. complex. (b) Interaction of silver(I) complexes Ag1–3 with commercial lambda bacteriophage DNA assessed by gel electrophoresis. 0.8% agarose gel with EthBr against a HyperLadder™ 1 kb DNA Ladder plus (FastGene) (Mw), DMSO is a control sample (C). Gel visualization by the Gel Doc EZ system (Bio-Rad, Life Sciences, Hercules, USA), equipped with the Image Lab™ Software.
Values of the binding constants of complexes Ag1–Ag3 with ct-DNA.
| Complex | Hypochromism (%) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| (7.33 ± 0.33) × 102 | 12.7 | 7.33 × 1010 | 1.05 × 102 | 0.76 |
|
| (1.29 ± 0.03) × 103 | 15.2 | 1.29 × 1011 | 4.83 × 102 | 0.90 |
|
| (1.15 ± 0.07) × 103 | 15.1 | 1.15 × 1011 | 4.33 × 102 | 0.88 |