| Literature DB >> 33809387 |
David Sánchez-Porras1,2,3, Daniel Durand-Herrera1,2, Ana B Paes4, Jesús Chato-Astrain1,2, Rik Verplancke5, Jan Vanfleteren5, José Darío Sánchez-López6, Óscar Darío García-García1,2, Fernando Campos1,2, Víctor Carriel1,2.
Abstract
Considering the high prevalence of cartilage-associated pathologies, low self-repair capacity and limitations of current repair techniques, tissue engineering (TE) strategies have emerged as a promising alternative in this field. Three-dimensional culture techniques have gained attention in recent years, showing their ability to provide the most biomimetic environment for the cells under culture conditions, enabling the cells to fabricate natural, 3D functional microtissues (MTs). In this sense, the aim of this study was to generate, characterize and compare scaffold-free human hyaline and elastic cartilage-derived MTs (HC-MTs and EC-MTs, respectively) under expansion (EM) and chondrogenic media (CM). MTs were generated by using agarose microchips and evaluated ex vivo for 28 days. The MTs generated were subjected to morphometric assessment and cell viability, metabolic activity and histological analyses. Results suggest that the use of CM improves the biomimicry of the MTs obtained in terms of morphology, viability and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis with respect to the use of EM. Moreover, the overall results indicate a faster and more sensitive response of the EC-derived cells to the use of CM as compared to HC chondrocytes. Finally, future preclinical in vivo studies are still needed to determine the potential clinical usefulness of these novel advanced therapy products.Entities:
Keywords: extracellular matrix; human elastic chondrocytes; human hyaline chondrocytes; microtissues; organoids; tissue engineering
Year: 2021 PMID: 33809387 PMCID: PMC8001313 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9030292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Time course phase-contrast microscopy of human chondrogenic microtissues (MTs) formation process. Note how the cells appear spread within the microchip at 0 days of ex vivo development (EVD), and after 24 h, they associate, forming MTs. Images show hyaline cartilage-derived microtissues (HC-MTs) and elastic cartilage-derived microtissues (EC-MTs) cultured in expansion media (EM) or chondrogenic media (CM). Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 2Graphical representation of Area and Circularity of human chondrogenic MTs for each day of EVD (A). Quantitative results of morphometric analysis of human chondrogenic MTs (B). Results are shown as mean ± SD values for area (a) (µm2 × 103), perimeter (p) (µm2) and circularity (c) for each experimental group and days of EVD. Here, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for the Mann–Whitney non-parametric test. Significant differences are indicated as follows: a Differences between MTs (HC or EC) with EM and their respective cell source MT with CM. b Differences between HC-MTs with EM or CM and EC-MTs with the same culture media.
Figure 3Time course of the Live/Dead assay of human chondrogenic MTs with CM and EM culture conditions. Color live/dead images were split into green channel (A) and red channel (B). A shows viable cells while B indicates the dead cells for each experimental condition. Note that all MTs generated are mainly composed of viable cells. A representative color image is also provided on the right (C). Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 4Graphical representation of DNA released (ng/µL) of human chondrogenic MTs for each day of EVD (A). Quantitative results of the DNA released and WST-1 biochemical test values of MT-forming human chondrocytes for each day of EVD (B). Results are shown as mean ± SD values for DNA in ng/µl and for WST-1 in absorbance (450 nm/690 nm) for each experimental group and day of ex vivo development (EVD). In this study, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test. Significant differences between groups are indicated with letters as follows: Differences between MTs (HC or EC) with EM and their respective cell source MT with CM. b Differences between MTs (HC or EC with EM or CM) and their respective cell source 2D media control. c Differences between HC-MTs with EM or CM and EC-MTs with the same culture media. d Differences between HC- or EC-2D control with EM and their respective cell source 2D control with CM. e Differences between HC-2D control with EM or CM and EC-2D control with the same culture media.
Figure 5Time course of hematoxylin-eosin (HE) light microscopy analysis of HC-MTs and EC-MTs under CM and EM conditions. HE shows homogenous cell distribution within all chondrogenic MTs. Note the general lower peripheral compaction in the case of EC-MT-EM with respect to the other conditions. For all pictures, scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 6Time course of histochemical analysis of chondrogenic marker S-100 (A) and proliferating marker PCNA (B) in the HC-MTs and EC-MTs cultured in EM and CM. Note that chondrogenic MTs show an S-100-positive reaction in all experimental conditions, being higher in HC-MTs (A). It is possible to observe that MTs are composed of abundant proliferating cells, where, in the case of EC-MTs, differences were observed with the use of CM (B). Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 7Histological and histochemical analyses of HC-MTs and EC-MTs under CM and EM. Alcian blue (AB) stains acid proteoglycans in light blue (A). Picrosirius (PS) stains the fibrillar collagen fibers in red (B). Note that CM-MTs show higher AB staining than EM-MTs (A). For all pictures, scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 8Histochemical analysis of expression of collagen type II (Col II) (A) and collagen type IV (Col IV) (B) of HC-MTs and EC-MTs under CM and EM. CM-MTs show higher reaction to Col II (A) in both cell types. Note the positive reaction to Col IV in EC-MTs (B). For all pictures, scale bar = 50 µm.