| Literature DB >> 33809105 |
Francesco Miragoli1,2, Vania Patrone1, Aldo Prandini3, Samantha Sigolo3, Matteo Dell'Anno4, Luciana Rossi4, Alice Senizza1, Lorenzo Morelli1, Maria Luisa Callegari1.
Abstract
Alternatives to antibiotic treatments are required owing to the ban on the use of these drugs as growth promoters in food animal production. Tributyrin appears to play a role in improving growth performance in pigs, albeit with varying degrees of effectiveness. So far, very little is known about its effects on gut microbiota composition. In this study, we investigated the gut microbiota changes of piglets receiving, at weaning, 0.2% tributyrin added to their basal diet. Microbiota composition was assessed through 16S-rRNA gene sequencing on stools collected from tributyrin and control groups. The functional profiles of microbial communities were predicted from amplicon abundance data. A comparison between dietary groups revealed that tributyrin strongly modulated gut microbiota composition in piglets, increasing the relative abundance of a number of bacterial genera such as Oscillospira, Oscillibacter, Mucispirillum and Butyrivibrio. These genera were positively correlated to animal average daily gain (ADG) and/or body weight (BW). Based on the function profile prediction, the gut microbiome of the tributyrin group possessed an enhanced potential for energy metabolism and a reduced potential for carbohydrate metabolism. In conclusion, our results indicated that tributyrin can promote changes to gut microbial communities, which could contribute to improving animal performance after weaning.Entities:
Keywords: animal performance; gut microbiota; piglets; tributyrin; weaning
Year: 2021 PMID: 33809105 PMCID: PMC8001585 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9030584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA, Bray-Curtis distance) plot of the gut microbiota of weaning piglets fed a diet with (TRI) or without tributyrin supplementation (CTR) (R2 = 0.19, p < 0.01).
Figure 2Relative abundances of the different phyla (A), families (B) and genera (C) observed in the tributyrin animal group (TRI) compared with those of the control group (CTR). Only top taxa are shown.
Figure 3The 15 most discriminant genera between control and tributyrin sample sequences as determined by Random Forest analysis using mean decrease in accuracy.
Figure 4The most discriminant Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) functional categories between control and tributyrin samples determined by Random Forest analysis using mean decrease in accuracy.
Mean values of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations of tributyrin (TRI) and control (CTR) piglet samples. Data are presented as mmol% ± SD.
| Acetate | Propionate | Isobutyrate | Butyrate | Isovalerate | Valerate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTR (n = 12) | 58.63 ± 6.15 | 23.93 ± 4.45 | 1.74 ± 0.91 | 9.93 ± 2.41 | 2.25 ± 1.37 | 3.51 ± 1.09 |
| TRI (n = 12) | 57.22 ± 3.35 | 22.72 ± 2.64 | 2.29 ± 0.82 | 10.84 ± 1.68 | 3.00 ± 1.24 | 3.93 ± 0.95 |
| 0.8852 | 0.2983 | 0.0269 | 0.4357 | 0.1410 | 0.5067 |
Figure 5The Spearman correlation heatmap graphically represents the correlation between Average Daily Gain (ADG), Body Weight (BW), isobutyrate, urea, total cholesterol, High-Density Lipoproteins (HDLs), Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDLs) and significant different genera between the two dietary groups. The colors display the r-value. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001 and **** p ≤ 0.0001. p value significances were graphically reported only for correlation between the aforementioned parameters and bacterial genus.