| Literature DB >> 33808849 |
Kanda Sornkayasit1,2, Amonrat Jumnainsong2,3, Wisitsak Phoksawat2,4, Wichai Eungpinichpong5, Chanvit Leelayuwat2,3.
Abstract
The beneficial physiological effects of traditional Thai massage (TTM) have been previously documented. However, its effect on immune status, particularly in the elderly, has not been explored. This study aimed to investigate the effects of multiple rounds of TTM on senescent CD4+ T cell subsets in the elderly. The study recruited 12 volunteers (61-75 years), with senescent CD4+ T cell subsets, who received six weekly 1-h TTM sessions or rest, using a randomized controlled crossover study with a 30-day washout period. Flow cytometry analysis of surface markers and intracellular cytokine staining was performed. TTM could attenuate the senescent CD4+ T cell subsets, especially in CD4+28null NKG2D+ T cells (n = 12; p < 0.001). The participants were allocated into two groups (low < 2.75% or high ≥ 2.75%) depending on the number of CD4+28null NKG2D+ T cells. After receiving TTM over 6 sessions, the cell population of the high group had significantly decreased (p < 0.001), but the low group had no significant changes. In conclusion, multiple rounds of TTM may promote immunity through the attenuation of aberrant CD4+ T subsets. TTM may be provided as a complementary therapy to improve the immune system in elderly populations.Entities:
Keywords: CD4+ T subsets; interleukin-17 (IL-17); member D (NKG2D); the elderly; the natural killer group 2; traditional Thai massage (TTM)
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33808849 PMCID: PMC8003732 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1CONSORT 2010 flowchart diagram.
Baseline characteristics of participants.
| Parameters | Baseline (Mean ± SD, Range) | Reference Value |
|---|---|---|
| Number of samples ( | 12 | |
| Gender (female/male) | 9/3 | |
| Age | 67.7 ± 5.12 (61–75) | |
| Blood pressure with range | ||
| Systolic (mmHg) | 131.1 ± 10.8 (108–143) * | 80–120 |
| Diastolic (mmHg) | 73.9 ± 10.2 (57–94) | 60–80 |
| Pulse rate | 72.3 ± 7.7 (61–87) | 80–100 |
| HbA1c (NGSP), % | 7.2 ± 2.4 * | 4.6–6.2 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.5–1.5 |
| ALT (U/L) | 25.3 ± 13.0 | 4–36 |
| Lipid profiles | ||
| - TC (mg/dL) | 217.3 ± 25.9 * | <200 |
| - TG (mg/dL) | 198.8 ± 175.0 * | <150 |
| - HDL-C (mg/dL) | 39.0 ± 15.2 * | >40 |
| - LDL-C (mg/dL) | 138.9 ± 33.5 * | <100 |
| Senescent CD4+ T cell subsets (%) at baseline | ||
| - CD4+28null | 7.4 ± 4.6 (1.8–17.7) | |
| - CD4+NKG2D+ | 1.4 ± 1.2 (0.3–4.4) | |
| - CD4+28+NKG2D+ | 1.3 ± 1.4 (0.4–5.0) | |
| - CD4+28nullNKG2D+ | 4.4 ± 4.3 (0.5–12.6) |
* abnormal values; SD: standard deviation; HbA1c: the glycated hemoglobin A1c; ALT: alkaline phosphatase; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NGSP: The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program. Notes: subjects had hypertension (2/12, 17%), DM (5/12, 42%) and dyslipidemia (3/12, 25%).
Comparisons of the percentages of CD4+ T cell subsets between groups at pre (baseline) and post (multiple sessions; once weekly, 6 sessions), and intergroups.
| Parameters | Resting Group ( | TTM Group ( | Group × Time # | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post |
| |
| CD4+ T cell subsets (%) | |||||
| CD4+ | 22.8 ± 12.7 | 23.0 ± 11.2 | 28.4 ± 7.9 | 27.9 ± 9.5 | 0.960 |
| CD4+28+ | 94.3 ± 3.1 | 93.0 ± 3.2 | 92.5 ± 3.7 | 94.9 ± 2.3 † | 0.035 |
| CD4+28null | 6.0 ± 3.1 | 7.6 ± 3.7 | 8.0 ± 4.2 | 5.4 ± 2.2 † | 0.039 |
| CD4+NKG2D+ | 1.0 ± 0.7 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 † | 0.044 |
| CD4+28+NKG2D+ | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 0.6 ± 0.4 † | 0.084 |
| CD4+28nullNKG2D+ | 3.9 ± 3.0 | 3.3 ± 3.0 | 4.9 ± 4.2 | 2.4 ± 2.6 † | 0.006 |
| High group of CD4+28nullNKG2D+ ( | 5.1 ± 3.3 | 5.1 ± 3.5 | 8.3 ± 3.1 * | 4.0 ± 2.9 † | <0.001 |
All data are expressed as means ± SD; # = analysis of two-way repeated-measures ANOVA; * = significant difference between groups at p < 0.05; † = significant difference between pre- and post-intervention at p < 0.05.
Effect sizes and post hoc power calculation.
| Variable | Δ Change between Pre- and Post-TTM |
| Effect Size | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of multiple round TTM | ||||
| CD4+ | 0.5 ± 1.6 | 0.866 | 0.33 | 0.17 |
| CD4+28+ | 2.4 ± 1.4 | 0.016 † | 1.69 | 0.99 |
| CD4+28null | 2.6 ± 2.0 | 0.023 † | 1.35 | 0.98 |
| CD4+NKG2D+ | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 0.001 † | 1.18 | 0.96 |
| CD4+28+NKG2D+ | 0.8 ± 0.9 | 0.012 † | 0.86 | 0.77 |
| CD4+28nullNKG2D+ | 2.5 ± 1.7 | <0.001 † | 1.49 | 0.99 |
| High group of | 4.4 ± 0.3 | <0.001 † | 17.6 | 1.00 |
The Δ change value was expressed as means ± SDs; difference between two dependent means (matched pairs) was analyzed by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA; † = Significant difference between pre- and post-intervention at p < 0.05; post hoc computed achieved power of type II error probability (1 − β) set at α = 0.05, two-tailed; each effect size and sample size (n = 12) using G*power 3.1 software.
Figure 2The alteration of CD4+ T cell subsets after multiple rounds of TTM. The representative plotted line graph displays the comparison of the percentages of CD4+ T (a), CD4+CD28+ T (b), CD4+CD28null T (c), CD4+NKG2D+ T (d), CD4+CD28+NKG2D+ T (e), and CD4+CD28nullNKG2D+ T cells (f) after TTM and resting. Data are displayed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was conducted by a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test, and significant differences were determined at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Changes in CD4+28null NKG2D+ T cells of high group (n = 6) and low group (n = 6). Participants were divided based on the median of the percentages of CD4+28null NKG2D+ T cells of pre-intervention (2.75%). The percentages of CD4+28null NKG2D+ T cells of TTM and resting phase were analyzed between and within groups. Only the high group of the TTM phase showed a significant decrease in NKG2D expression on CD4+28null T cells after multiple rounds of TTM (n = 6; p < 0.001), whereas others displayed no significant differences. Statistical analysis was through a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. p-value < 0.05 was determined as a significant difference.
Figure 4Representative plotting line graph (n = 6) displaying the comparison of the percentages of CD4+CD28nullNKG2D+ T cells producing IFN-γ (a) and IL-17 (b) at pre- and post-TTM phase. The data are shown by median ± SE. IFN-γ production pre and post was 6.3 ± 1.4 and 2.7 ± 0.7, respectively. IL-17 production pre and post was 5.0 ± 1.9 and 3.1 ± 0.9, respectively. Data were analyzed by Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. p-value < 0.05 was determined as a significant difference.