| Literature DB >> 26436433 |
Thanarat Sripongngam1, Wichai Eungpinichpong2, Dhavee Sirivongs3, Jaturat Kanpittaya4, Kamonwan Tangvoraphonkchai5, Sutin Chanaboon6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stress can cause psychological and physiological changes. Many studies revealed that massage can decrease stress. However, traditional Thai massage has not been well researched in this regard. The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of traditional Thai massage (TTM) on salivary alpha-amylase levels (sAA), heart rate variability (HRV), autonomic nervous system (ANS) function, and plasma renin activity (PRA). MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-nine healthy participants were randomly allocated into either a traditional Thai massage (TTM) group or Control (C) group, after which they were switched to the other group with a 2-week wash-out period. Each of them was given a 10-minute mental arithmetic test to induce psychological stress before a 1-hour session of TTM or rest. RESULTS Within-groups comparison revealed that sAA was significantly decreased (p<0.05) in the TTM group but not in the C group. HRV and ANS function were significantly increased (p<0.05) and PRA was significantly decreased (p<0.05) in both groups. However, low frequency per high frequency ratio (LF/HF ratio) and ANS balance status were not changed. Only sAA was found to be significantly different between groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that both TTM and rest can reduce psychological stress, as indicated by decreased sAA levels, increased parasympathetic activity, decreased sympathetic activity, and decreased PRA. However, TTM may have a modest effect on stress reduction as indicated by a reduced sAA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26436433 PMCID: PMC4599180 DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.894343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit Basic Res ISSN: 2325-4394
Figure 1Diagram on crossover design used in this study. TTM and C group: 1 hour for each protocol, 1 trial per protocols, and 2 weeks of wash out period. TTM: traditional Thai massage, C: Control or rest.
Figure 2The points on the meridian lines massage of TTM as depicted by Wichai Eungpinichpong [32].
Comparison on the outcome measures within each group (compare between immediately after mental arithmetic test and after each protocol).
| Outcome | TTM group (n=29) | Control group (n=29) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After test | After TTM | After test | After rest | |
| sAA levels (KU/L) | 5.00±1.95 | 3.69±2.35 | 4.41±1.24 | 4.9±1.26 |
| HR (bpm) | 78.28±9.94 | 73.9±9.56 | 78.1±11.6 | 74.03±9.93 |
| SDNN (ms) | 42.28±23.65 | 51.67±20.09 | 38.63±15.56 | 49.96±16.95 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 27.44±15.37 | 34.38±19.57 | 27.18±16.41 | 32.94±16.83 |
| HF (ms2) | 4.81±1.03 | 5.25±1.07 | 4.76±1.27 | 5.27±1.1 |
| LF (ms2) | 5.58±0.84 | 6.14±1.02 | 5.50±0.80 | 6.06±0.97 |
| LF/HF ratio | 2.84±2.2 | 3.69±3.48 | 3.15±3.27 | 3.46±3.73 |
| ANS activity | 95.48±19.51 | 104±15.28 | 93.28±15.24 | 103.62±14.86 |
| ANS balance | 57.14±39.4 | 65.86±40.84 | 52.28±43.22 | 56.76±46.13 |
| Stress index | 96.79±14.87 | 88.10±11.66 | 100.72±17.61 | 91.86±9.55 |
| Stress resistance | 96.66±17.1 | 105.28±16.37 | 92.00±14.85 | 103.03±13.87 |
| Mental stress | 4.9±1.84 | 1.1±1.57 | 4.62±1.92 | 1.66±1.42 |
| PRA (ng/ml/hr.) | 6.55±5.65 | 5.26±4.68 | 8.58±5.63 | 6.18±5.3 |
Data are expressed as mean ±SD. TTM – traditional Thai massage; sAA levels – salivary alpha-amylase levels; HR – heart rate; SDNN – the standard deviation of the normal-to normal intervals; RMSSD – the square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal R-R intervals; HF – high frequency; LF – low frequency; LF/HF ratio – low frequency per high frequency ratio; ANS activity – autonomic nervous system activity; ANS balance – autonomic nervous system balance; PRA – plasma renin activity. Significant change within group,
p<0.05,
p<0.01.
Comparison on the outcome measures between the groups (compare between immediately after mental arithmetic test and the protocols).
| Outcome | Compared after test | Compared after protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTM (n=29) | Rest (n=29) | TTM (n=29) | Rest (n=29) | |
| sAA levels (KU/L) | 5.00±1.95 | 4.41±1.24 | 3.69±2.35 | 4.9±1.26 |
| HR (bpm) | 78.28±9.94 | 78.1±11.6 | 73.9±9.56 | 74.03±9.93 |
| SDNN (ms) | 42.28±23.65 | 38.63±15.56 | 51.67±20.09 | 49.96±16.95 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 27.44±15.37 | 27.18±16.41 | 34.38±19.57 | 32.94±16.83 |
| HF (ms2) | 4.81±1.03 | 4.76±1.27 | 5.25±1.07 | 5.27±1.1 |
| LF (ms2) | 5.58±0.84 | 5.50±0.80 | 6.14±1.02 | 6.06±0.97 |
| LF/HF ratio | 2.84±2.2 | 3.15±3.27 | 3.69±3.48 | 3.46±3.73 |
| ANS activity | 95.48±19.51 | 93.28±15.24 | 104±15.28 | 103.62±14.86 |
| ANS balance | 57.14±39.4 | 52.28±43.22 | 65.86±40.84 | 56.76±46.13 |
| Stress index | 96.79±14.87 | 100.72±17.61 | 88.10±11.66 | 91.86±9.55 |
| Stress resistance | 96.66±17.1 | 92.00±14.85 | 105.28±16.37 | 103.03±13.87 |
| Mental stress | 4.9±1.84 | 4.62±1.92 | 1.1±1.57 | 1.66±1.42 |
| PRA (ng/ml/hr.) | 6.55±5.65 | 8.58±5.63 | 5.26±4.68 | 6.18±5.3 |
Data are expressed as mean ±SD. TTM – traditional Thai massage; sAA levels – salivary alpha-amylase levels; HR – heart rate; SDNN – the standard deviation of the normal-to normal intervals; RMSSD – the square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal R-R intervals; HF – high frequency; LF – low frequency; LF/HF ratio – low frequency per high frequency ratio; ANS activity – autonomic nervous system activity; ANS balance – autonomic nervous system balance; PRA – plasma renin activity.
Significant difference between the groups (p<0.05).