| Literature DB >> 33806018 |
María Botella-Cruz1, Josefa Velasco1, Andrés Millán1, Stefan Hetz2, Susana Pallarés3.
Abstract
In the context of aridification in Mediterranean regions, desiccation resistance and physiological plasticity will be key traits for the persistence of aquatic insects exposed to increasing desiccation stress. Control of cuticular transpiration through changes in the quantity and composition of epicuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) is one of the main mechanisms of desiccation resistance in insects, but it remains largely unexplored in aquatic ones. We studied acclimation responses to desiccation in adults of two endemic water beetles from distant lineages living in Mediterranean intermittent saline streams: Enochrus jesusarribasi (Hydrophilidae) and Nebrioporus baeticus (Dytiscidae). Cuticular water loss and CHC composition were measured in specimens exposed to a prior non-lethal desiccation stress, allowed to recover and exposed to a subsequent desiccation treatment. E. jesusarribasi showed a beneficial acclimation response to desiccation: pre-desiccated individuals reduced cuticular water loss rate in a subsequent exposure by increasing the relative abundance of cuticular methyl-branched compounds, longer chain alkanes and branched alkanes. In contrast, N. baeticus lacked acclimation capacity for controlling water loss and therefore may have a lower physiological capacity to cope with increasing aridity. These results are relevant to understanding biochemical adaptations to drought stress in inland waters in an evolutionary and ecological context.Entities:
Keywords: CHC profiles; aquatic insects; aridification; cuticle permeability; desiccation; physiological plasticity
Year: 2021 PMID: 33806018 PMCID: PMC8064485 DOI: 10.3390/insects12040285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental design showing the different stress exposure steps and timings for cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) sampling and total water loss rate (WLR) estimation.
Figure 2Cuticular water loss rate measured in D1 (individuals from the control exposed to desiccation) and D2 (individuals from the prior desiccation exposed to a subsequent desiccation). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments in Bonferroni post hoc tests (p < 0.05).
Total abundance of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC), number of CHC compounds, median chain length (CL) (total and for each CHC main class) and number and proportion of compounds of each class (number of CHC of the corresponding class over the total) for the studied species. D1: individuals from the water control exposed to desiccation, D2: individuals from the prior desiccation exposed to a subsequent desiccation treatment.
| Species | Treatment | Total n° CHC | Median CL ± SE | Alkanes | Unsaturated | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Abundance (ng) | n-Alkanes | Branched Alkanes | |||||||||||
| n° | % | Median CL ± SE | n° | % | Median CL ± SE | n° | % | Median CL ± SE | |||||
|
| Control | 1315.92 ± 177.04 a | 42 | 25.62 ± 0.09 | 8 | 16.91 | 25.96 ± 0.15 a | 26 | 39.16 a | 26.06 ± 0.06 a | 8 | 43.93 a | 23.83 ± 0.25 |
| D1 | 2036.90 ± 339.58 b | 42 | 25.44 ± 0.16 | 9 | 17.12 | 26.23 ± 0.15 a | 25 | 35.45 a | 26.76 ± 0.25 a | 9 | 47.43 a | 23.33 ± 0.17 | |
| D2 | 1294.13 ± 171.13 a | 40 | 26.56 ± 0.20 | 7 | 21.52 | 27.97 ± 0.68 b | 26 | 56.65 b | 27.72 ± 0.11 b | 7 | 21.83 b | 23.98 ± 0.22 | |
|
| Control | 7936.46 ± 1548.11 a | 48 | 24.70 ± 0.06 | 8 | 32.11 | 25.99 ±0.05 | 26 | 27.24 | 25.01 ± 0.12 | 14 | 40.65 | 23.21 ± 0.05 a |
| D1 | 6333.31 ± 379.04 b | 47 | 24.81 ± 0.03 | 8 | 37.91 | 25.96 ± 0.10 | 25 | 27.40 | 25.12 ± 0.09 | 12 | 34.69 | 23.35 ± 0.06 a | |
| D2 | 3505.50 ± 618.20 c | 41 | 24.66 ± 0.16 | 10 | 32.34 | 25.04 ± 0.16 | 21 | 25.97 | 25.10 ± 0.37 | 10 | 41.67 | 23.85 ± 0.29 b | |
1Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in the relative abundance (%) and median chain length (CL) of the main cuticle hydrocarbons (CHC) classes between C, D1 and D2 groups within each studied species, from the ANOVA and post hoc tests results.
Figure 3Total amount of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) (Mean ± S.E.) (a,b), and mean relative abundance of the major CHC classes (c,d) in the different treatments (C: water control, D1: individuals from the control exposed to desiccation and D2: individuals from the prior desiccation exposed to a subsequent desiccation) of Enochrus jesusarribasi (left) and Nebrioporus baeticus (right). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences in Bonferroni post hoc tests (p < 0.05) between treatments (a,b) and between treatments within each major CHC class (c,d).
Figure 4Score plots of the two principal components of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC) concentration in Enochrus jesusarribasi (a) and Nebrioporus baeticus (b) (each dot represents an individual sample, ellipses represent the 95% confidence region for each species sample group, and the explained variances are shown in both axes in brackets). The variable importance plots (VIP) show the CHC compounds that contributed the most to the first axis based on their VIP scores for E. jesusarribasi (c) and N. baeticus (d) (colored squares represent the relative CHC concentrations of the corresponding compounds in each species; the corresponding ID number in Table S1 is indicated in brackets). C: water control, D1: individuals from the control exposed to desiccation, D2: individuals from the prior desiccation exposed to subsequent desiccation.