| Literature DB >> 33805009 |
Virginia Casas-Arrojo1, Juan Decara1,2, María de Los Ángeles Arrojo-Agudo1, Claudia Pérez-Manríquez3,4, Roberto T Abdala-Díaz1.
Abstract
Porphyridium cruentum is a unicellular microalga that can synthesize and secrete to the culture medium-high amounts of polysaccharides. In this study, the immunomodulatory, cytotoxic effect and antioxidant activity of the sulfated polysaccharides (PcSPs) were determinate. The PcSPs were precipitated with 2% Cetylpyridinium bromide hydrate and ethanol and purified by dialysis. The extract was lyophilized for its characterization by Fourier transform-Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The antioxidant activity of PcSPs were examined with assay 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) and compared with that of the biomass, observing significant differences between the results obtained from the PcSPs and biomass. To determine their ability to induce cytokine production Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukina-6 (IL-6), the immunomodulatory activity of the PcSPs has been evaluated. In the mouse macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7), PcSPs are potent inducers of IL-6 cytokines but mainly of TNF-α. The cytotoxic capacity of PcSPs was measured by the MTT colorimetric assay in colorectal carcinoma (HTC-116), human leukemia (U-937 and HL-60), breast cancer (MCF-7), lung cancer (NCI-H460) and human gingival fibroblasts (HGF-1) cell lines. The IC50 value of 2311.20 µg mL-1, 1676.74 µg mL-1, 1089.63 µg mL-1, 5498.14 µg mL-1 and 2861.49 µg mL-1 respectively in the tumor lines and 5022.55 µg mL-1 in gingival fibroblasts were obtained. Our study suggested that PcSPs from P. cruentum have a moderate immunomodulatory and cytotoxic effect. The results obtained indicate that the polysaccharides from P. cruentum are potent inducers of IL-6 cytokines and, most importantly, of TNF-α. PcSPs showed no evidence of antigenic activity or hypersensitivity when administered intraperitoneally in mice. Furthermore, the in vivo study revealed an improvement of local inflammatory response against stress in the peritoneum. These findings suggest that the PcSPs from P. cruentum might have potential as a valuable ingredient in nutraceutical products.Entities:
Keywords: Porphyridium cruentum; antioxidant capacity; immunomodulation; sulfated polysaccharides
Year: 2021 PMID: 33805009 PMCID: PMC8063939 DOI: 10.3390/biom11040488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Content of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, ash and moisture in biomass from P. cruentum (% of DW) (n = 3).
| Percentages | |
|---|---|
| Proteins | 15.96 ± 0.09% |
| Carbohydrates | 48.53 ± 0.25% |
| Lipids | 6.85 ± 0.12% |
| Inorganic compounds | 20.14 ± 0.96% |
| Moisture | 8.52 ± 0.19% |
Values reported are means ± standard deviations.
Figure 1FT-IR spectra of the sulfated polysaccharides (PcSPs).
Content of monosaccharides in PcSPs.
| Monosaccharide | Retention Time (min) | Peak Area | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ribose (Rib) | 18.42 | 101,886 | 0.4 |
| 2 | Fucose (Fuc) | 19.44 | 1,807,537 | 7 |
| 3 | Xylose (Xyl) | 20.97 | 178,746 | 0.7 |
| 4 | Arabinose (Arb) | 25.46 | 12,405,336 | 48.3 |
| 5 | Mannose (Mann) | 26.09 | 2,650,521 | 10.3 |
| 6–7 | α and β-Galactose (Gal) | 27.41–27.52 | 5,994,240 | 23.3 |
| 8 | Glucose (Glc) | 28.96 | 1,914,772 | 7.4 |
| 9 | Glucuronic acid (Glc-A) | 29.83 | 650,111 | 2.5 |
Rib = Ribose; Fuc = Fucose; Xyl = Xylose; Arb = Arabinose; Mann = Mannose; Gal = Galactose; Glc = glucose; Glc-A = Glucuronic Acid.
Figure 2Scavenging effects % of the sample of biomass from P. cruentum and PcSPs on ABTS radical. Different points with the same letter correspond to different concentrations with no significant differences between them (post-hoc Tukey HSD test).
Figure 3Survival (%) cell lines exposed to different concentrations of PcSPs. (A) Survival (%) of HTC-116 cell line; (B) Survival (%) of U-937 cell line; (C) Survival (%) of HL-60 cell line; (D) Survival (%) of MCF-7 cell line, (E) Survival (%) of NCI-H460 cell line and (F) Survival (%) of HGF-1 cell line. Different points with the same letter correspond to different concentrations with no significant differences between them (post-hoc Tukey HSD test).
Figure 4Flow cytometry results for the cell cycle distribution of subpopulations of HL-60 cells in control and samples treated with PcSPs after 24 h. Quantitative analysis of cell cycle data for the full range of tested PcSPs concentration. The plotted values correspond to the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.
Figure 5Production of TNF-α and IL-6 by RAW 264.7 exposed to different concentrations of PcSPs. Data points represent the average of eight samples ± SD.
Effects of PcSPs administration on peritoneal murine macrophages counted after treatment.
| WBCs | Basal | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEH | PcSPs | VEH | PcSPs | VEH | PcSPs | ||
| Neutrophils | 22.06 ± 5.33 | 17.95 ± 6.42 | 19.29 ± 4.15 | 22.63 ± 2.88 | 15.60 ± 4.97 Aa | 12.47 ± 4.09 c | 11.50 ± 4.31 c |
| Eosinophils | 0.78 ± 0.88 | 4.40 ± 2.56c | 1.57 ± 1.40 A | 1.50 ± 1.07 | 0.60 ± 0.52 | 4.16 ± 0.74 a | 5.50 ± 1.78 c |
| Basophils | 0.53 ± 0.61 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.35 | 0.10 ± 0.32 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| Lymphocytes | 69.89 ± 5.32 | 76.65 ± 7.34 a | 70.57 ± 5.50 | 63.38 ± 2.00 | 77.70 ± 5.58 Bb | 81.22 ± 4.29 c | 82.00 ± 6.86 c |
| Monocytes | 6.56 ± 3.22 | 1.71 ± 2.21 b | 9.83 ± 2.91 C | 6.38 ± 1.69 | 6.00 ± 3.09 | 2.40 ± 1.52 a | 2.83 ± 1.57 a |
Values are given as the ± SEM (n = 6 animals per group). Differences between groups were evaluated using One-way ANOVA and Boferroni’s multiple comparisons test: (a) p < 0.05, (b) p < 0.01 and (c) p < 0.001 vs. Basal group, (A) p < 0.05, (B) p < 0.01 and (C) p < 0.001 vs. VEH group.
Figure 6Effects of PcSPs administration on peritoneal murine macrophages counted after treatment. The bars indicate the mean ± SEM (n = 6 animals per group). Differences between groups were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and Boferroni’s multiple comparisons test: (a) p < 0.01 and (b) p < 0.001 vs. CONT group, (c) p < 0.001 vs. LPS group and (d) p < 0.001 vs. PcSPs group.