| Literature DB >> 33804335 |
Henri Didier1,2, Fausto Assandri1,2, Francesca Gaffuri1,2, Davide Cavagnetto1,2, Andrea Abate1,2, Michele Villanova3, Carlo Maiorana1,2.
Abstract
Clinical practice and some scientific evidence seem to suggest that there is some kind of relationship between the components that form the postural chain. For professional dancers, good posture and balance are essential. The aim of the present retrospective study is to evaluate whether gnathological treatment could have an impact on the postural balance and sports performance of professional ballet dancers. Electromyographic (EMG) data and balance tests were recorded before and after six months of treatment with a customized occlusal splint. Twenty athletes were examined during ballet exercises in terms of balance and speed of execution by two experienced clinicians. The results showed statistically significant changes for all EMG tests carried out and the Flamingo Balance Test. It appears that the use of a customized occlusal device improved neuro-muscular coordination and the overall performance of dancers.Entities:
Keywords: dance; occlusion; oral pathologies treatment; oral rehabilitation; temporomandibular joint; well-being of the oral cavity
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804335 PMCID: PMC8000128 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9030251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Statistical comparison of the electromyographic (EMG) and kinesiographic values before and after trans-electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and orthotic treatment.
| Variables | T1 | T2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median | IQR | Mean ± SD | Median | IQR | ||
| FWS (Scan 3) | 1.06 ± 0.77 § | 0.75 | 0.6 | 3.33 ± 1.71 | 3.35 | 2.7 | <0.001 ** |
| R-MM (Scan 9) | 2.53 ± 0.59 § | 2.25 | 1.1 | 2.14 ± 0.20 § | 2.05 | 0.3 | 0.024 * |
| L-MM (Scan 9) | 2.51 ± 0.76 | 2.40 | 0.9 | 2.08 ± 0.35 § | 2.10 | 0.4 | 0.040 * |
| R-TA (Scan 9) | 2.85 ± 0.60 | 2.80 | 1.0 | 2.33 ± 0.58 § | 2.50 | 0.5 | 0.038 * |
| L-TA (Scan 9) | 2.69 ± 0.60 | 2.75 | 1.1 | 2.07 ± 0.50 | 2.00 | 0.7 | 0.005 * |
| R-SCOM (Scan 9) | 2.39 ± 0.56 § | 2.10 | 0.9 | 2.59 ± 0.34 § | 2.50 | 0.4 | 0.063 |
| L-SCOM (Scan 9) | 2.36 ± 0.62 | 2.20 | 1.2 | 2.71 ± 0.37 § | 2.80 | 0.2 | 0.007 * |
| R-TR (Scan 9) | 2.41 ± 0.70 § | 2.10 | 1.2 | 2.68 ± 0.42 § | 2.50 | 0.5 | 0.021 * |
| L-TR (Scan 9) | 2.54 ± 0.77 § | 2.10 | 1.4 | 2.84 ± 0.47 § | 2.80 | 0.2 | 0.032 * |
| A.S. # (Scan 20) | 30% | 0% | 0.031 * | ||||
| MM/TA # (Scan 11) | 30% | 0% | <0.001 ** | ||||
| FBT barefoot | 57.75 ± 5.50 | 60 | 0 | 60 ± 0.0 | 60 | 0 | 0.083 |
| FBT ballet shoes | 60 ± 0.0 | 60 | 0 | 60 ± 0.0 | 60 | 0 | 1 |
| FBT eyes closed | 21.30 ± 22.03 | 11.50 | 33 | 28.90 ± 20.07 | 20 | 38 | 0.013 * |
Legend: FWS, free-way space; A.S., atypical swallowing; R/L MM, right/left masseter muscle; R/L AT, right/left anterior temporal muscle; R/L SCOM, right/left sternocleidomastoid muscle; R/L Tr, right/left trapezius; MM/AT, muscular relationship recruitment (masseter muscle/temporalis anterior); FBT, Flamingo Balance Test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; § not normally distributed data. Wherever not specified, data are normally distributed; # binomial data, where the descriptive statistics are expressed as the percentage of patients presenting the variable and inferential statistics as the signed rank test.