Literature DB >> 17197186

Comparison of standing balance between female collegiate dancers and soccer players.

Peter G Gerbino1, Elizabeth D Griffin, David Zurakowski.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study was designed as a comparison study of two cohorts.
OBJECTIVES: The hypothesis of this study was that soccer players and dancers have different balance abilities and that these differences could be objectively measured using center of pressure measurements.
BACKGROUND: Center of pressure (COP) measurements are reproducible and have been validated in the literature for assessing standing balance. The literature does not provide sensitive enough techniques for discriminating between two groups of athletes with excellent standing balance. METHODS AND MEASURES: A Matscan pressure mat (Tekscan, Boston, MA) was used to compare COP change variability between 32 female collegiate soccer players and 32 dancers. COP was used to calculate sway index, center acquisition time, sway path length and sway velocity as measures of standing balance.
RESULTS: The dancers had significantly better balance scores (p<0.05) in 5 of 20 balance tests. Results for the remaining 15 balance tests were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: These data show that standing balance characteristics of dancers and soccer players can be objectively measured using COP data. Dancers have certain standing balance abilities that are better than those of soccer players. The COP measurements in this study can be used as a tool in future studies investigating standing balance in different groups of athletes.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17197186     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.11.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  34 in total

1.  Cross-sectional area of psoas major muscle and hip flexion strength in youth soccer players.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hoshikawa; Tomomi Iida; Nozomi Ii; Masataka Muramatsu; Yoshiharu Nakajima; Kentaro Chumank; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effect of recreational soccer training and running on postural balance in untrained men.

Authors:  Markus Due Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Peter Krustrup; Per Aagaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effect of different types of shoes on balance among soccer players.

Authors:  Angela Notarnicola; Giuseppe Maccagnano; Vito Pesce; Silvio Tafuri; Marco Mercadante; Alessandra Fiore; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-10-20

4.  Postural trials: expertise in rhythmic gymnastics increases control in lateral directions.

Authors:  A R Calavalle; D Sisti; M B L Rocchi; R Panebianco; M Del Sal; V Stocchi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Comparison of dynamic balance in adolescent male soccer players from rwanda and the United States.

Authors:  Robert J Butler; Robin M Queen; Brian Beckman; Kyle B Kiesel; Phillip J Plisky
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-12

Review 6.  A systematic review of the relationship between physical activities in sports or daily life and postural sway in upright stance.

Authors:  Henri Kiers; Jaap van Dieën; Henk Dekkers; Harriët Wittink; Luc Vanhees
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Role of vision in sighted and blind soccer players in adapting to an unstable balance task.

Authors:  María Campayo-Piernas; Carla Caballero; David Barbado; Raúl Reina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Postural control in patients with lumbar disc herniation in the early postoperative period.

Authors:  Tomasz Sipko; Marzena Chantsoulis; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Fractal properties of postural sway during quiet stance with changed visual and proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  Katerina Stambolieva
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 10.  Balance ability and athletic performance.

Authors:  Con Hrysomallis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.