INTRODUCTION: The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has become a popular and reliable alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Initially described as a valuable tissue source for women with low body-mass index, indications nowadays have widely expanded. The Western civilization demographic development with its aging population and the steady growing average BMI has led to increasing breast reconstructions with TMG flaps in overweight and aged individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 300 TMG free flaps for unilateral autologous breast reconstruction were evaluated in the form of a retrospective double center cohort study. Data extraction, study group formation and statistical analysis (One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's chi-squared statistical analysis and relative risk calculation) were done specifically to evaluate age and BMI as risk factors for postoperative complications and outcome. RESULTS: No significant differences in patients' age and BMI in the complication groups compared to the no-complication group could be found. No significant difference regarding the occurrence of complications could be found in any of the formed risk-groups. No significant increase of minor-, major- or overall complications, flap loss or revision surgeries were found in the elderly patient groups or for patients with overweight. CONCLUSION: Age and overweight do not significantly increase the risk for postoperative complications after breast reconstructions with free TMG flaps. The findings of this study support the fact that microsurgical breast reconstruction with a free TMG flap should not solely be reserved for younger patients and females with a lower BMI.
INTRODUCTION: The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has become a popular and reliable alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Initially described as a valuable tissue source for women with low body-mass index, indications nowadays have widely expanded. The Western civilization demographic development with its aging population and the steady growing average BMI has led to increasing breast reconstructions with TMG flaps in overweight and aged individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 300 TMG free flaps for unilateral autologous breast reconstruction were evaluated in the form of a retrospective double center cohort study. Data extraction, study group formation and statistical analysis (One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's chi-squared statistical analysis and relative risk calculation) were done specifically to evaluate age and BMI as risk factors for postoperative complications and outcome. RESULTS: No significant differences in patients' age and BMI in the complication groups compared to the no-complication group could be found. No significant difference regarding the occurrence of complications could be found in any of the formed risk-groups. No significant increase of minor-, major- or overall complications, flap loss or revision surgeries were found in the elderly patient groups or for patients with overweight. CONCLUSION:Age and overweight do not significantly increase the risk for postoperative complications after breast reconstructions with free TMG flaps. The findings of this study support the fact that microsurgical breast reconstruction with a free TMG flap should not solely be reserved for younger patients and females with a lower BMI.
Entities:
Keywords:
TMG flap; autologous breast reconstruction; breast reconstruction; complication analysis; transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap; transverse upper gracilis flap
Authors: Luigi Losco; Ana Claudia Roxo; Carlos W Roxo; Federico Lo Torto; Alberto Bolletta; Alessandro de Sire; Dicle Aksoyler; Diego Ribuffo; Emanuele Cigna; Carlos P Roxo Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: Stephen J Vega; Sven N Sandeen; Ronald P Bossert; Anthony Perrone; Luis Ortiz; Hector Herrera Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Radbeh Torabi; Mark W Stalder; Oren Tessler; Matthew J Bartow; Jonathan Lam; Charles Patterson; M Whitten Wise; Charles L Dupin; Hugo St Hilaire Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Joseph A Greco; Eric T Castaldo; Lillian B Nanney; Y-C Wu; Rafe Donahue; J Jason Wendel; Kevin F Hagan; R Bruce Shack Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: John R Beard; Alana Officer; Islene Araujo de Carvalho; Ritu Sadana; Anne Margriet Pot; Jean-Pierre Michel; Peter Lloyd-Sherlock; JoAnne E Epping-Jordan; G M E E Geeske Peeters; Wahyu Retno Mahanani; Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; Somnath Chatterji Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Luis Chang-Azancot; Pedro Abizanda; María Gijón; Nitzan Kenig; Manuel Campello; Jessica Juez; Antonio Talaya; Gregorio Gómez-Bajo; Javier Montón; Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 2.708