Literature DB >> 33804298

Age and Overweight Are Not Contraindications for a Breast Reconstruction with a TMG-Flap-A Risk and Complication Analysis of a Retrospective Double Center Study Including 300 Patients.

Karl Schwaiger1, Laurenz Weitgasser2, Maximilian Mahrhofer2, Kathrin Bachleitner2, Selim Abed1, Julia Wimbauer1, Elisabeth Russe1, Thomas Schoeller2, Gottfried Wechselberger1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has become a popular and reliable alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Initially described as a valuable tissue source for women with low body-mass index, indications nowadays have widely expanded. The Western civilization demographic development with its aging population and the steady growing average BMI has led to increasing breast reconstructions with TMG flaps in overweight and aged individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 300 TMG free flaps for unilateral autologous breast reconstruction were evaluated in the form of a retrospective double center cohort study. Data extraction, study group formation and statistical analysis (One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's chi-squared statistical analysis and relative risk calculation) were done specifically to evaluate age and BMI as risk factors for postoperative complications and outcome.
RESULTS: No significant differences in patients' age and BMI in the complication groups compared to the no-complication group could be found. No significant difference regarding the occurrence of complications could be found in any of the formed risk-groups. No significant increase of minor-, major- or overall complications, flap loss or revision surgeries were found in the elderly patient groups or for patients with overweight.
CONCLUSION: Age and overweight do not significantly increase the risk for postoperative complications after breast reconstructions with free TMG flaps. The findings of this study support the fact that microsurgical breast reconstruction with a free TMG flap should not solely be reserved for younger patients and females with a lower BMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMG flap; autologous breast reconstruction; breast reconstruction; complication analysis; transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap; transverse upper gracilis flap

Year:  2021        PMID: 33804298      PMCID: PMC7957526          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  35 in total

1.  Medial Thigh Lift in the Massive Weight Loss Population: Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Carlo M Oranges; Andrea Sisti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Lower abdominal bulge after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian; Bahram Momen
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Lower Body Lift After Bariatric Surgery: 323 Consecutive Cases Over 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Luigi Losco; Ana Claudia Roxo; Carlos W Roxo; Federico Lo Torto; Alberto Bolletta; Alessandro de Sire; Dicle Aksoyler; Diego Ribuffo; Emanuele Cigna; Carlos P Roxo
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Donor-site morbidity of the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap in autologous breast reconstruction: short-term and long-term results.

Authors:  Petra Pülzl; Thomas Schoeller; Kristin Kleewein; Gottfried Wechselberger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients.

Authors:  S S Kroll; D T Netscher
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Gracilis myocutaneous free flap in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen J Vega; Sven N Sandeen; Ronald P Bossert; Anthony Perrone; Luis Ortiz; Hector Herrera
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Assessing Age as a Risk Factor for Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Radbeh Torabi; Mark W Stalder; Oren Tessler; Matthew J Bartow; Jonathan Lam; Charles Patterson; M Whitten Wise; Charles L Dupin; Hugo St Hilaire
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Autologous breast reconstruction: the Vanderbilt experience (1998 to 2005) of independent predictors of displeasing outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph A Greco; Eric T Castaldo; Lillian B Nanney; Y-C Wu; Rafe Donahue; J Jason Wendel; Kevin F Hagan; R Bruce Shack
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing.

Authors:  John R Beard; Alana Officer; Islene Araujo de Carvalho; Ritu Sadana; Anne Margriet Pot; Jean-Pierre Michel; Peter Lloyd-Sherlock; JoAnne E Epping-Jordan; G M E E Geeske Peeters; Wahyu Retno Mahanani; Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; Somnath Chatterji
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Predictive risk factors of complications in different breast reconstruction methods.

Authors:  J S Palve; T H Luukkaala; M T Kääriäinen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  1 in total

1.  Age and Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Luis Chang-Azancot; Pedro Abizanda; María Gijón; Nitzan Kenig; Manuel Campello; Jessica Juez; Antonio Talaya; Gregorio Gómez-Bajo; Javier Montón; Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.708

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.