| Literature DB >> 33804278 |
Hyun-Ju Noh1, Yerin Park1,2, Soon Gyu Hong1, Yung Mi Lee1.
Abstract
The diversity of lichen-associated bacteria from lichen taxa Cetraria, Cladonia, Megaspora, Pseudephebe, Psoroma, and Sphaerophorus was investigated by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Physiological characteristics of the cultured bacterial isolates were investigated to understand possible roles in the lichen ecosystem. Proteobacteria (with a relative abundance of 69.7-96.7%) were mostly represented by the order Rhodospirillales. The 117 retrieved isolates were grouped into 35 phylotypes of the phyla Actinobacteria (27), Bacteroidetes (6), Deinococcus-Thermus (1), and Proteobacteria (Alphaproteobacteria (53), Betaproteobacteria (18), and Gammaproteobacteria (12)). Hydrolysis of macromolecules such as skim milk, polymer, and (hypo)xanthine, solubilization of inorganic phosphate, production of phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid, and fixation of atmospheric nitrogen were observed in different taxa. The potential phototrophy of the strains of the genus Polymorphobacter which were cultivated from a lichen for the first time was revealed by the presence of genes involved in photosynthesis. Altogether, the physiological characteristics of diverse bacterial taxa from Antarctic lichens are considered to imply significant roles of lichen-associated bacteria to allow lichens to be tolerant or competitive in the harsh Antarctic environment.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctic lichens; indole-3-acetic acid; lichen-associated bacteria; macromolecule hydrolysis; nitrogen fixation; phosphate solubilization
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804278 PMCID: PMC8001610 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9030607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Information on the lichen specimens used in this study.
| Scheme | Genus | Sample ID | Growth Type | Photobiont | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012KG-B0531 |
| Ct | Fruticose | Chlorolichen | 62, 14′10.334″ S | 58, 43′08.263″ W |
| 2012KG-B0306 |
| Cl | Fruticose | Chlorolichen | 62, 14′26.606″ S | 58, 43′34.412″ W |
| 2012KG-B0468-FD42 |
| Ms | Crustose | Chlorolichen | 62, 14′20.781″ S | 58, 45′28.821″ W |
| 2012KG-B0625-FD85 |
| Pp | Fruticose | Chlorolichen | 62, 13′46.984″ S | 58, 46′52.696″ W |
| 2012KG-B0524B0-FD16 |
| Ps | Squamulose | Tripartite | 62, 14′10.334″ S | 58, 43′08.263″ W |
| 2012KG-B0103-FD77 |
| Sp | Fruticose | Chlorolichen | 62, 13′39.591″ S | 58, 45′33.939″ W |
Figure 1Maximum likelihood tree of isolates with closely related reference species based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Representative isolates for each phylotype are indicated by bold letters. Branches supported by high bootstrap values (>70%) are shown as thick lines.
Distribution of bacterial isolates according to lichen.
| Taxonomic Assignment | Isolated From * | Total Number of Isolates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum or Class | Order | Phylotype | Ct | Cl | Ms | Pp | Ps | Sp | |
| Actinobacteria | Micrococcales |
| – | – | 3 | – | – | – | 3 |
| – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | |||
| – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | |||
| – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | |||
| – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | |||
| – | – | 9 | – | – | – | 9 | |||
|
| – | – | 4 | – | – | – | 4 | ||
| – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | |||
| Mycobacteriales | – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | ||
| Streptomycetales |
| – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | |
| Alphaproteobacteria | Rhizobiales | – | – | 3 | – | 1 | – | 4 | |
|
| – | – | – | – | 6 | – | 6 | ||
|
| – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | ||
| 2 | 3 | – | – | – | – | 5 | |||
| Rhodospirillales |
| – | 2 | – | 1 | – | – | 3 | |
| – | – | – | 1 | – | 3 | 4 | |||
| Sphingomonadales | – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | ||
| – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | |||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
|
| – | – | 6 | – | – | – | 6 | ||
|
| – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | ||
|
| – | – | 4 | – | 6 | – | 10 | ||
| – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | |||
| 1 | 3 | – | – | 1 | – | 5 | |||
| Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales |
| 2 | 7 | – | – | 4 | – | 13 |
| – | – | – | – | 4 | – | 4 | |||
| – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | |||
| Gammaproteobacteria | Lysobacterales |
| – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| Pseudomonadales | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | ||
| – | – | – | – | 10 | – | 10 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Sphingobacteriales |
| – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 |
| – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | |||
| – | – | – | – | 3 | – | 3 | |||
| Deinococcus-Thermus | Deinococcales | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | |
| Total | 5 | 15 | 51 | 2 | 39 | 5 | 117 | ||
* Sample ID is indicated in Table 1.
Figure 2Effect of temperature on bacterial growth. The degree of growth was scored from 1 to 4, with a higher number indicating better growth.
Physiological characteristics.
| Phylum or Class (Order) | Phylotype | Number of Isolates a | Physiological Characteristics b | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | Polymer | Xanthine | Hypoxanthine | Phosphate Solubilization | Growth Hormone d | Nitrogen Fixation e | |||
|
|
| 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| 2 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 2 | – | ||
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | ||
| 2 | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | 1 | ||
| 9 | – | 5 | – | – | – | – | 8 | ||
|
| 4 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 2 | – | ||
|
| 1 | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | |
|
| 4 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | |
| ( |
| 6 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 1 | – |
|
| 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | |
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | ||
|
|
| 3 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 3 | – |
| ( | 4 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 1 | – | |
|
| 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| ( | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | |
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | ||
|
| 6 | – | – | – | 1 | – | 6 | 3 | |
|
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | |
|
| 10 | 2 | – | – | 1 | – | 10 | 1 | |
| 2 | – | – | – | 1 | – | 2 | – | ||
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | – | ||
|
|
| 13 | – | 6 c | 13 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 13 |
| 4 | 1 | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | – | ||
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | ||
|
|
| 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | – |
| 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | ||
| 10 | – | – | – | – | 9 | 10 | – | ||
|
|
| 2 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 2 | – |
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 3 | ||
|
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
a Numbers indicate the total number of cultured isolates of each phylotype. b Numbers indicate the number of isolates showing the positive activity. c Number indicates positive isolates for the hydrolysis of Tween 60 except that of Caballeronia mineralivorans, which indicates the result of hydrolysis of Tween 20. d Growth hormone indicates the production of phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid. e Nitrogen fixation was determined by growing on nitrogen-free medium. Isolates growing with scores (≥3) on the nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Nfb) solid medium were denoted as nitrogen-fixing bacteria.