| Literature DB >> 33803951 |
Zabihollah Nemati1, Zahra Moradi1, Kazem Alirezalu2, Maghsoud Besharati1, António Raposo3.
Abstract
Medicinal plants with antibacterial effects have been used by humans for centuries. In the recent decade, due to the development of antibiotic resistant strains, many studies have focused on the use of natural compounds as feed additives in livestock. Ginger, among all, have repetitively shown numerous biological activities, antibacterial, and antibiotic properties. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ginger root powder (GP) on the performance, egg quality, and blood parameters of Japanese quail. A total of 240 10-weeks old female quails were used in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments, 4 replicates, and 15 birds per replicate. Dietary treatment were basal diet (control) and basal diet containing 0.5, 1, and 1.5 g/kg of ginger root powder. Growth performance and exterior and interior quality of egg were measured biweekly over eight-week period. At the end of experiment blood parameters were evaluated. The results showed that diet supplementation with different levels of GP had no significant effect on egg production, egg mass weight, and egg weight (p > 0.05). However, feed intake and feed conversion ratio were significantly lower in the treatment group than the control in the whole period (p < 0.05). Egg Quality traits (shape index, albumen index, the percentage of albumen, yolk and shell, yolk pH, and shell thickness and strength) were not affected by the supplements in the whole trial period. Addition of GP significantly increased the albumen height, Haugh unit, and albumen pH in comparison with the control treatment (p < 0.05). GP reduced blood triglyceride level yet was ineffective on blood total antioxidant capacity and malondialdehyde. In conclusion, dietary supplementation with GP, could improve productive performance and the egg quality of Japanese quails. Nonetheless a comprehensive study needs to be performed in order to evaluate the impact of quail dietary ginger supplementation on productive performance and egg quality and their stability during storage time for commercial use.Entities:
Keywords: Japanese quail performance; antioxidant; egg quality traits; ginger; immunity
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803951 PMCID: PMC8001588 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18062995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Ingredient and composition of the basal diet.
| Item | Value (%) | Diet Composition | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 45.38 | ME (kcal/kg) | 2900 |
| Soybean meal | 32.50 | Crude protein (%) | 20 |
| Wheat bran | 10.51 | Ca (%) | 2.5 |
| Soybean oil | 3.2 | Available P (%) | 0.39 |
| Di calcium phosphate | 1.8 | Na | 0.15 |
| Calcium carbonate | 5.3 | Methionine (%) | 0.7 |
| Methionine | 0.39 | Lysine (%) | 1.12 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.32 | Sys (%) | 0.34 |
| Bicarbonate | 0.1 | ||
| Vitamin 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Trace mineral 2 | 0.3 |
1 Supplied per kg of feed: vitamin B1, 2.16 mg; vitamin B2, 7.92 mg; pantothenic acid, 12 mg; nicotinic acid;36, vitamin B6, 3.6 mg; folic acid, 1.2 mg; biotin, 0.12 mg; vitamin K3, 2.4 mg; vitamin E, 21.6 IU; chloin chloride, 300; antioxidant, 120 mg; vitamin A, 10,800 IU; vitamin D3, 2400 IU and vitamin B12, 0.018 mg. 2 Supplied per kg feed: FeSO4, 0.15 g; MnSO4, 0.12 g; CuSO4, 0.03 g; I, 1.2 mg and Se, 0.24 mg.
Nutrient composition of ginger powder (% DM) used in the experiment.
| Item | Level (%) |
|---|---|
| Dry matter, DM | 88.5 |
| Phenol, component (g/100 gr) | 0.703 |
| Crude protein | 5.5 |
| Ash | 11.75 |
| Organic matter, OM | 88.25 |
| Ether extract, EE | 1.35 |
| Neutral detergent fiber, NDF | 7.5 |
| Acid detergent fiber, ADF | 4.5 |
| Natural detergent soluble fiber, NDS | 92.5 |
| Acid Detergent soluble fiber, ADS | 95.5 |
Effects of ginger powder supplementation on productive performance in Japanese quails.
| Item | Feed Intake (g/day) | Feed Conversion Ratio (g:g) | Egg Production Rate (%) | Egg Weight (g) | Egg Mass (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treat | ||||||
| Control | 33.87 a | 3.03 | 92.99 | 12.01 | 11.16 | |
| GP0.5 | 32.93 b | 2.88 | 94.10 | 12.13 | 11.41 | |
| GP1.0 | 32.19 c | 2.77 | 94.42 | 12.31 | 11.62 | |
| GP1.5 | 31.33 d | 2.72 | 94.77 | 12.15 | 11.51 | |
| SEM | 0.17 | 0.02 | 1.19 | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
| Week 0 | 34.02 | 2.99 | 93.87 | 12.12 | 11.37 | |
| Time, w | ||||||
| Week 2 | 34.21 a | 2.95 | 94.51 | 12.25 a | 11.58 a | |
| Week 4 | 32.13 b | 2.78 | 94.91 | 12.17 a | 11.54 a | |
| Week 6 | 32.06 b | 2.85 | 93.84 | 11.99 b | 11.25 b | |
| Week 8 | 31.93 b | 2.82 | 93.03 | 12.18 a | 11.33 b | |
| SEM | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.08 | 0.08 | |
| treat × Time | ||||||
| Control | Week 2 | 34.71 | 3.02 a,b | 93.92 | 12.22 | 11.48 |
| Control | Week 4 | 34.45 | 3.01 a,b,c | 94.10 | 12.13 | 11.41 |
| Control | Week 6 | 33.66 | 3.1 a | 92.32 | 11.77 | 10.85 |
| Control | Week 8 | 32.68 | 2.99 a,b,c,d | 91.61 | 11.91 | 10.91 |
| GP0.5 | Week 2 | 34.82 | 3.05 a,b | 93.21 | 12.26 | 11.42 |
| GP0.5 | Week 4 | 32.11 | 2.81 d,e,f | 94.46 | 12.08 | 11.39 |
| GP0.5 | Week 6 | 31.94 | 2.85 b,c,d,e,f | 93.03 | 12.02 | 11.18 |
| GP0.5 | Week 8 | 32.84 | 2.82 c,d,e,f | 95.71 | 12.15 | 11.63 |
| GP1.0 | Week 2 | 34.05 | 2.89 b,c,d,e | 95.17 | 12.36 | 11.77 |
| GP1.0 | Week 4 | 31.19 | 2.69 f,g | 94.28 | 12.26 | 11.56 |
| GP1.0 | Week 6 | 32.03 | 2.77 e,f,g | 94.50 | 12.23 | 11.56 |
| GP1.0 | Week 8 | 31.50 | 2.71 e,f,g | 93.75 | 12.37 | 11.59 |
| GP1.5 | Week 2 | 33.25 | 2.85 b,c,d,e,f | 95.71 | 12.15 | 11.65 |
| GP1.5 | Week 4 | 30.80 | 2.61 g | 96.78 | 12.19 | 11.80 |
| GP1.5 | Week 6 | 30.58 | 2.68 f,g | 95.53 | 11.94 | 11.42 |
| GP1.5 | Week 8 | 30.69 | 2.74 e,f,g | 91.07 | 12.31 | 11.19 |
| SEM | 0.42 | 0.03 | 1.64 | 0.16 | 0.17 | |
| Probability | ||||||
| Treat | >0.0001 | >0.0001 | 0.74 | 0.48 | 0.16 | |
| Time | >0.0001 | >0.0001 | 0.32 | 0.001 | 0.007 | |
| Treat × Time | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.41 | 0.06 | |
Different letters (a, b, c, d, e, f or g) after the means within a column indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Effect of different level of ginger root powder on egg quality of Japanese quails.
| Traits | Experimental Diets | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginger Powder (g/kg of Diet) | SEM | Treatment | Time | Treatment | ||||
| 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | |||||
| Shape index % | 128.97 | 130.25 | 253.90 | 122.66 | 62.09 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.43 |
| Albumen index % | 10.36 | 10.74 | 10.89 | 10.79 | 0.23 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.009 |
| Yolk index % | 44.77 c | 47.02 a | 46.16 a,b | 45.17 b,c | 0.54 | 0.005 | >0.001 | 0.13 |
| Albumen height (mm) | 3.81 b | 3.99 a | 4.11 a | 4.04 a | 0.04 | 0.004 | 0.21 | 0.02 |
| Haugh unit | 84.88 b | 86.06 a | 86.62 a | 86.27 a | 0.24 | 0.003 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
| Albumen weight | 7.45 | 7.49 | 7.52 | 7.53 | 0.09 | 0.93 | 0.49 | 0.15 |
| Yolk colour | 4.25 b | 4.45 b | 4.70 a | 4.75 a | 0.08 | 0.004 | >0.001 | >0.001 |
| Shell weight (g) | 0.965 | 0.966 | 0.987 | 0.989 | 0.01 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.98 |
| Albumen percentage % | 59.92 | 60.80 | 60.14 | 60.41 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.11 | 0.29 |
| Yolk percentage % | 32.31 | 31.35 | 31.95 | 31.64 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.44 |
| Shell percentage % | 7.76 | 7.84 | 7.90 | 7.93 | 0.11 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.29 |
| Albumen to yolk | 0.539 | 0.515 | 0.531 | 0.524 | 0.008 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.33 |
| Yolk weight (g) | 4.02 | 3.86 | 3.99 | 3.94 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.70 |
| Yolk pH | 5.87 a | 5.84 b | 5.81 b | 5.85 b | 0.01 | 0.02 | >0.001 | 0.02 |
| Albumen pH | 8.91 a | 8.78 b | 8.77 b | 8.83 b | 0.02 | 0.01 | >0.001 | 0.009 |
| Egg specific gravity (g/cm3) | 1.0740 | 1.0745 | 1.0748 | 1.0750 | 0.0006 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.97 |
| Shell thickness (mm × 10)2 | 20.61 | 20.67 | 20.29 | 20.76 | 0.35 | 0.80 | 0.005 | 0.51 |
| Shell strength (hg/cm2) | 19.51 | 19.71 | 19.86 | 19.94 | 0.28 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.97 |
Different letters (a, b or c) after the means within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Effect of treatment and time Interaction on egg albumen and yolk traits in Japanese quails fed different level of ginger root powder.
| Treat | Time (Week) | Albumen Index | Albumen Height (mm) | Yolk Colour | Yolk pH | Albumen pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 2 | 10.38 a,b | 3.71 b | 3.87 d | 5.91 a,b | 8.99 a,b |
| Control | 4 | 9.75 b | 3.68 b | 4.56 b,c | 5.85 a,b,c,d | 9.10 a |
| Control | 6 | 10.36 a,b | 3.90 a,b | 4.35 b,c,d | 5.84 a,b,c,d | 8.81 c,d,e,f |
| Control | 8 | 10.95 a,b | 3.94 a,b | 4.20 b,c,d | 5.89 a,b,c | 8.75 c,d,e,f |
| GP0.5 | 2 | 9.98 a,b | 4.01 a,b | 4.20 b,c,d | 5.81 b,c,d | 8.73 e,f,g |
| GP0.5 | 4 | 11.09 a,b | 4.001 a,b | 4.12 c,d | 5.82 a,b,c,d | 8.91 a,b,c,d |
| GP0.5 | 6 | 10.86 a,b | 3.91 a,b | 4.56 b,c,d | 5.85 a,b,c,d | 8.74 e,f,g |
| GP0.5 | 8 | 11.02 a,b | 4.04 a,b | 4.91 a,b | 5.88 a,b,c | 8.72 e,f,g |
| GP1.0 | 2 | 10.99 a,b | 4.26 a | 4.29 b,c,d | 5.76 d | 8.76 c,d,e,f |
| GP1.0 | 4 | 10.33 a,b | 3.98 a,b | 4.41 b,c,d | 5.81 a,b,c,d | 8.90 a,b,c,e |
| GP1.0 | 6 | 11.50 a | 4.25 a | 4.54 b,c,d | 5.81 a,b,c,d | 8.72 d,f,g |
| GP1.0 | 8 | 10.71 a,b | 3.94 a,b | 5.56 a | 5.86 a,b,c,d | 8.70 f |
| GP1.5 | 2 | 10.24 a,b | 4.05 a,b | 4.35 b,c,d | 5.85 a,b,c,d | 8.81 b,c,d,e,f |
| GP1.5 | 4 | 10.45 a,b | 4.04 a,b | 4.50 b,c,d | 5.79 c,d | 8.89 a,b,c,d,e,f |
| GP1.5 | 6 | 11.26 a,b | 4.06 a,b | 4.58 b,c,d | 5.84 a,b,c,d | 8.76 c,d,e,f |
| GP1.5 | 8 | 10.87 a,b | 4.02 a,b | 5.56 a | 5.92 a | 8.86 b,c,d,e,f |
| SEM | 0.34 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |
| 0.009 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.009 |
Different letters (a, b, c, d, e, f or g) after the means within a column indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Biochemical parameters in blood serum of Japanese quail fed diets with ginger powder supplementation.
| Treatments | Protein | Albumin | Triacylglycerol | Cholesterol | Glucose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5.80 | 1.60 | 453.1 a | 243 | 195 |
| Ginger (0.5 g/kg of diet) | 5.70 | 1.43 | 351.8 b | 247 | 242 |
| Ginger (1 g/kg of diet) | 5.73 | 1.56 | 336.8 b | 210 | 173 |
| Ginger (1.5 g/kg of diet) | 6.15 | 1.70 | 342.6 b | 219 | 221 |
| SEM | 0.28 | 0.1 | 23.03 | 22.18 | 21.80 |
| 0.64 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.58 | 0.17 |
Different letters (a or b) after the means within a column indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) (a) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (b) in Japanese quails fed different levels of GP. Values (means ± SEM) within the same week with uncommon letters are significantly (p < 0.05) different.