| Literature DB >> 33803793 |
Julia B Krajewska1, Jakub Włodarczyk1, Damian Jacenik2, Radzisław Kordek3, Przemysław Taciak4, Remigiusz Szczepaniak5, Jakub Fichna1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: RAW264.7 macrophages; colitis; gold (III) complex; inflammatory bowel diseases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803793 PMCID: PMC8003307 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22063121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Neutral red uptake test (A) and Griess test (B) for RAW264.7 macrophages treated with TGS 121. *** p < 0.001 vs. control; # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.001 vs. 1 ug/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS).
Figure 2The effect of TGS 121 on colonic inflammation in a dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced model of colitis: macroscopic score (A), stool score (B), myeloperoxidase activity (C), and microscopic score (D) for control, DSS-only treated mice, and mice with DSS-induced colitis treated with TGS 121 in two doses: 1.68 μg/kg (TGS 121 A) and 16.8 μg/kg (TGS 121 B). Representative photos of hematoxylin and eosin staining of colon samples (E). Scale bar = 100 μm. *p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 as compared with the control mice; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 as compared with DSS-treated animals.
Figure 3The influence of DSS colitis induction and TGS 121 treatment on the antioxidant profile in the mouse colon: heme oxygenase-1 (A), catalase (B), glutathione (C), glutathione disulfide (D), glutathione peroxidase (E), cyclooxygenase-1 (F), and cyclooxygenase-2 (G) for control, DSS-only treated mice, and mice with DSS-induced colitis treated with TGS 121 in two doses: 1.68 μg/kg (TGS 121 A) and 16.8 μg/kg (TGS 121 B). * p < 0.05 as compared with the control mice; # p < 0.05 as compared with DSS-treated animals.
Figure 4The influence of DSS colitis induction and TGS 121 treatment on the expression of intestinal wall function proteins for control, DSS-only treated mice, and mice with DSS-induced colitis treated with TGS 121 at 16.8 μg/kg (TGS 121 B): Tjp1 (A), Cldn1 (B), Cldn3 (C), Cldn4 (D), Cldn5 (E), Cldn7 (F), Cldn8 (G), Cldn11 (H), Cldn12 (I), Cldn15 (J), Cldn17 (K), Ocln (L).* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 as compared with the control mice; # p < 0.05 as compared with DSS-treated animals.
Primer sequences of tight junction genes and the housekeeping gene.
| Gene | Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
|
| Forward | TTTTAATTTCAGGTCTGGCG |
| Reverse | CAAATTCATACCTGGCATTG | |
|
| Forward | ATTTCTATAACCCGTTGGTG |
| Reverse | AGAATAGAGGATCTTGGTGG | |
|
| Forward | GACTGTGCAAAGTTACTAGC |
| Reverse | ACCAGCAATTTGGATGTAAG | |
|
| Forward | AACAGTTCCTACTGAGATCC |
| Reverse | CTTTTTAACACGTCCCTCTG | |
|
| Forward | CATTGTTTTCATTGTGGCAG |
| Reverse | CTCGTACTTAACGTTCATGG | |
|
| Forward | GAAGTCATATCATGCAAGGG |
| Reverse | TGAGTGTCAGGAGTTAGAAG | |
|
| Forward | CTGGTGGACATCCTCATC |
| Reverse | AGAGAGCCAGCAGAATAAG | |
|
| Forward | ATTATCTCTGCTTTGTGTGC |
| Reverse | TTCAAGGTAATCAGCGTTTC | |
|
| Forward | ACATGGATCTCTCCAAGAAG |
| Reverse | CATACTTGGTTCCAGCATAC | |
|
| Forward | TCGGCAGCAACATTATTATC |
| Reverse | ATGCCAATAATGAGAGCAAC | |
|
| Forward | GGAGAGTGAAGAGTACATGG |
| Reverse | TGTCATAATCTCCCACCATC | |
|
| Forward | ACTAGCATCAGACCATTCAG |
| Reverse | CGTCTACATGTTTTACAGGAG | |
|
| Forward | AGGGATTTGAATCACGTTTG |
| Reverse | TTTACTGGCAACATCAACAG |