| Literature DB >> 33803786 |
Maho Yagi-Utsumi1,2, Tomohiro Tanaka1,3,4, Yoko Otsubo4,5,6, Akira Yamashita4,5, Shinji Yoshimura4,6,7, Motohiro Nishida1,3,4, Koichi Kato1,2.
Abstract
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has attracted much attention in the fields of biotechnology and medicine owing to its potential utility in clinical applications. Recently accumulating evidence has demonstrated that CAP influences protein structures. However, there remain open questions regarding the molecular mechanisms behind the CAP-induced structural perturbations of biomacromolecules. Here, we investigated the potential effects of CAP irradiation of amyloid β (Aβ), an amyloidogenic protein associated with Alzheimer's disease. Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we observed gradual spectral changes in Aβ after a 10 s CAP pretreatment, which also suppressed its fibril formation, as revealed by thioflavin T assay. As per mass spectrometric analyses, these effects were attributed to selective oxidation of the methionine residue (Met) at position 35. Interestingly, this modification occurred when Aβ was dissolved into a pre-irradiated buffer, indicating that some reactive species oxidize the Met residue. Our results strongly suggest that the H2O2 generated in the solution by CAP irradiation is responsible for Met oxidation, which inhibits Aβ amyloid formation. The findings of the present study provide fundamental insights into plasma biology, giving clues for developing novel applications of CAP.Entities:
Keywords: NMR; amyloid β; cold atmospheric plasma; hydrogen peroxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803786 PMCID: PMC8003251 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22063116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration and (b) picture of the experimental setup for the helium atmospheric pressure plasma irradiation system primarily used in this study. In this 8.0 W plasma jet system, He gas passed through pure water and moist He with 100% relative humidity served as the source gas. The applied peak-to-peak voltage (5.0 kV), the distance between the electrodes (38 mm), and the distance between the powered electrode and the edge of the glass tube (23 mm) were represented.
Figure 2NMR spectral change of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP)-treated Aβ (1–40). (a) The primary structure of Aβ (1–40) peptide. (b) A portion of 1H–15N heteronuclear single-quantum correlation (HSQC) spectra of Aβ (1–40) without irradiation. Portions of 1H–15N HSQC spectra of Aβ (1–40) measured at 48 h (c) after a 10 s irradiation of CAP or (d) after dissolving into the 10 s pre-irradiated buffer solution. The time course of NMR peak volume ratio of Met35 (1H 8.2 ppm, 15N 122.0 ppm, open circle) and Met35* (1H 8.4 ppm, 15N 121.4 ppm, closed circle) of Aβ (1–40) (e) after the 10 s irradiation of CAP or (f) after dissolving into the pre-irradiated buffer solution.
Figure 3ThT fluorescence intensity profiles of the aggregation of Aβ (1–40) without (red) and with CAP pretreatment for 10 s (blue) or 20 s (green). Each intensity value is the mean ± SD of three values.
Figure 4HPLC profiles of (a) Aβ (1–40) without CAP treatment, (b) Aβ (1–40) with 10 s CAP treatment, and (c) Aβ (1–40) dissolved into the buffer solution pretreated with CAP. (d) Changes in the HPLC peak area ratio of peak-1 to peak-2 depending on the period of CAP irradiation. Each ratio value is the mean ± SD of three values. (e) TEM images of amyloid fibrils prepared by Aβ (1–40) in peak-1 (left panel) and in peak-2 (right panel) fractions.
Figure 5LC-MS/MS fragmentation profile of tryptic peptide of Aβ (1–40) fraction corresponding to peak-1. M* denotes oxidized Met.
Figure 6(a) The portions of 1H–15N HSQC spectra of Aβ (1–40) in the absence (black) and presence (red) of 800 μM H2O2. The spectrum of Aβ (1–40) was measured at 24 h after H2O2 treatment. (b) Changes in the NMR peak volume ratio of Met35 (1H 8.2 ppm, 15N 122.0 ppm, open circle) and Met35* (1H 8.4 ppm, 15N 121.4 ppm, closed circle) of Aβ (1–40) depending on the H2O2 concentration. (c) HPLC profiles of Aβ (1–40) treated with 800 μM H2O2. (d) Changes in the HPLC peak area ratio of peak-1 to peak-2 depending on the H2O2 concentration. HPLC peak area ratios were plotted as a function of the H2O2 concentration used for the Aβ (1–40) treatment (black circle) along with those from the CAP irradiation experiments. For plotting, the CAP irradiation period was converted into the concentration of H2O2 generated in the buffer solution pretreated with CAP using 8.0 W and 1.0 W plasma jet apparatuses (according to the results shown in Figure S4 (red rhombus) and Figure S5 (blue triangle), respectively). Each ratio value is the mean ± SD of three values.