| Literature DB >> 33803754 |
Carolina Reyes1, Alexandre Poulin1, Gustav Nyström1,2, Francis W M R Schwarze3, Javier Ribera3.
Abstract
White-rot fungi can degrade all lignocellulose components due to their potent lignin and cellulose-degrading enzymes. In this study, five white-rot fungi, Trametes versicolor, Trametes pubescens, Ganoderma adspersum, Ganoderma lipsiense, and Rigidoporus vitreus were tested for endoglucanase, laccase, urease, and glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) production when grown with malt extract and nanocellulose in the form of TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) oxidized cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). Results show that temperature plays a key role in controlling the growth of all five fungi when cultured with malt extract alone. Endoglucanase activities were highest in cultures of G. adspersum and G. lipsiense and laccase activities were highest in cultures of T. versicolor and R. vitreus. Urease activities were highest in cultures of G. adspersum, G. lipsiense, and R. vitreus. Glucose-6-phosphate levels also indicate that cells were actively metabolizing glucose present in the cultures. These results show that TEMPO-oxidized CNF and CNC do not inhibit the production of specific lignocellulose enzymes by these white-rot fungi. The apparent lack of enzymatic inhibition makes TEMPO-oxidized CNF and CNC excellent candidates for future biotechnological applications in combination with the white-rot fungi studied here.Entities:
Keywords: CNC; CNF; Ganoderma; Rigidoporus; TEMPO; Trametes; cellulose; lignocellulosic enzymes
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803754 PMCID: PMC8003285 DOI: 10.3390/jof7030222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Growth rates of white rot fungi in the presence of different percentages of malt extract (ME) and glucose (GL). (A,D,G,J,M) show the growth of fungi at various percent relative humidities (RH). (B,E,H,K,N) show the growth of fungi at various temperatures. (C,F,I,L,O) show the growth of fungi at various pHs. Data represent an average of ≥ 5 biological replicates.
Figure 2Endoglucanase activity at different days of incubation period of various white rot fungi when incubated with 2% (w/v) malt extract and TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) at 25 °C and 80% relative humidity. (A) Cultures were shaken at 120 rpm during incubation. (B) Cultures were initially shaken to stimulate growth but after 2 days they were left to stand for the duration of the experiment. Data represent an average of three biological replicates.
Figure 3Laccase activity at different days of incubation period of various white rot fungi when incubated with 2% (w/v) malt extract and TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) at 25 °C and 80% relative humidity. (A) Cultures were shaken at 120 rpm during incubation. (B) Cultures were initially shaken to stimulate growth but after 2 days they were left to stand for the duration of the experiment. Data represent an average of three biological replicates.
Figure 4Urease activity at different days of incubation period of various white rot fungi when incubated with 2% (w/v) malt extract and TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) at 25 °C and 80% relative humidity. Cultures were initially shaken to stimulate growth but after 2 days they were left to stand for the duration of the experiment. Data represent an average of three biological replicates.
Figure 5Glucose-6-P concentration at different days of incubation period of various white rot fungi when incubated with 2% (w/v) malt extract and TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) at 25 °C and 80% relative humidity. Cultures were initially shaken to stimulate growth but after 2 days they were left to stand for the duration of the experiment. Data represent an average of three biological replicates.
Comparison of endoglucanase activities of fungi grown in the presence of crystalline cellulose or wood.
| Fungus | Growth Conditions | Endoglucanase Activity | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5% micro crystalline cellulose (Avicel medium) (150 rpm, 27 °C) | 65.6 ± 7.3 U/mL (14 days) | Metreveli et al. [ | |
| 1.5% micro crystalline cellulose (Avicel medium) (150 rpm, 27 °C) | 28 ± 3.9 U/mL (14 days) | Metreveli et al. [ | |
| 1.5% micro crystalline cellulose (Avicel medium) (150 rpm, 27 °C) | 34.3 ± 3.1 U/mL (14 days) | Metreveli et al. [ | |
| 1.5% micro crystalline cellulose (Avicel medium) (150 rpm, 27 °C) | 51.7 ± 4.3 U/mL (14 days) | Metreveli et al. [ | |
| 2% commercial microcrystalline cellulose (Mandel’s medium) | ~ 22 U/mL (15 days) | Liu et al. [ | |
| 2% commercial microcrystalline cellulose (Mandel’s medium) | ~ 9 U/mL (15 days) | Liu et al. [ | |
| 2% commercial microcrystalline cellulose (Mandel’s medium) | ~ 32 U/mL (15 days) | Liu et al. [ | |
| 2% commercial microcrystalline cellulose (Mandel’s medium) | ~5 U/mL (15 days) | Liu et al. [ | |
| Nanocellulose prepared by microbial hydrolysis (Mandel’s medium) | ~0.04 IU/mL (Day 1)~0.16 IU/mL (Day 5) | Satyamurthy et al. [ | |
| Nanofibrilliated cellulose (NFC) | ~0.02 IU/mL (Day 1) | Satyamurthy et al. [ | |
| 0.3% nanocellulose prepared by microbial hydrolysis (Mandel’s medium) | ~0.2 IU/mL (Day 5) | Satyamurthy et al. [ | |
| Birch wood | 0.21 U/mL (42 days) | Irbe et al. [ | |
| Aspen wood | 0.30 U/mL (42 days) | Irbe et al. [ | |
| Alder wood | 0.29 U/mL (42 days) | Irbe et al. [ | |
| Pine wood | 0.25 ± 0.02 U/mL (10 days) | Elisashvili et al. [ | |
| Pine wood | 0.33 ± 0.01 U/mL (20 days) | Elisashvili et al. [ | |
| TEMPO-oxidized-CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 20 ± 5 U/mL (25 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 6 ± 2 U/mL (14 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 16 ± 3 U/mL (25 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 8 ± 4 U/mL (14 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 34 ± 2 U/mL (25 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~23 ± 2 U/mL (14 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 42 ± 9 U/mL (25 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 16 ± 4 U/mL (25 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 21 ± 2 U/mL (25 days) | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~ 15 ± 5 U/mL (25 days) | This study |
RH refers to relative humidity; ME refers to Malt Extract.
Comparison of laccase activities of fungi grown in the presence of various lignocellulosic substrates.
| Fungus | Growth Conditions | Laccase Activity | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose medium, submerged fermentation containing mandarin peels | 3008 ± 325 U/L | Elisashvili et al. [ | |
| Glucose medium, submerged fermentation containing tree leaves (25 °C, 150 rpm) | 769 ± 84 U/L | Ellisashvili et al. [ | |
| Glucose medium, submerged fermentation containing apple peels (25 °C, 150 rpm) | 540 ± 59 U/L | Elisashvili et al. [ | |
| Glucose medium, submerged fermentation containing banana peels | 1294 ± 149 U/L (10 days) | Elisashvili et al. [ | |
| Glucose medium, containing barley bran (30 °C, 150 rpm) | 639 U/L (37 days) | Lorenzo et al. [ | |
| Glucose medium, containing grape stalks (30 °C, 150 rpm) | 450 U/L (37 days) | Lorenzo et al. [ | |
| Glucose medium, containing grape seeds (30 °C, 150 rpm) | 250 U/L (37 days) | Lorenzo et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing CMC | 131 ± 3.7 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing maltose | 178 ± 3.4 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing Avicel | 48 ± 2.7 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing | 663 ± 22.2 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing | 5243 ± 113 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing CMC | 27 ± 2.7 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing maltose | 69 ± 10.3 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing Avicel | 15 ± 0.1 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing | 34 ± 4.1 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing | 428 ± 19.5 U/L | Mikiashvili et al. [ | |
| Birch wood | 0.01 U/mL | Irbe et al. [ | |
| Aspen wood | 0.01 U/mL | Irbe et at. [ | |
| Alder wood | 0 U/mL | Irbe et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing glucose and veratryl alcohol | 122 ± 24 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing wood spruce dust (25 °C, standing cultures) | 198 ± 44 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~351 ± 35 U/L | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC (0.2 wt%) | ~225 ± 79 U/L | This study | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing glucose and veratryl alcohol | 282 ± 86 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing wood spruce dust (25 °C, standing cultures) | 53 ± 20 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) (2% ( | ~30 ± 16 U/L | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized-CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC (0.2 wt%) | ~110 ± 71 U/L | This study | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing glucose and veratryl alcohol | 2128 ± 252 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ | |
| Basal synthetic medium containing wood spruce dust (25 °C, standing cultures) | 755 ± 148 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ | |
| TEMPO-oxidized-CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~603 ± 75 U/L | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized-CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~238 ± 32 U/L | This study | |
| † Ganoderma lipsiense | Basal synthetic medium containing glucose and veratryl alcohol | 104 ± 18 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ |
| Basal synthetic medium containing wood spruce dust (25 °C, standing cultures) | 18 ± 15 U/L | Ihssen et al. [ | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~4 ± 0 U/L | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) (2% ( | ~2 ± 1 U/L | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~95 ± 31 U/L | This study | |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF(0.017 wt%) and CNC(0.2 wt%) | ~19 ± 14 U/L | This study |
RH refers to relative humidity; RT refers to room temperature; * Rigidoporus vitreus 643 is the same as 642 reported in Ihssen et al. 2011; ** Trametes pubescens 220 is mislabeled in Ihssen et al. 2011 as 568; ¥ Ganoderma adspersum 646 is the same as strain 647 reported in Ihssen et al. 2011; † Ganoderma lipsiense 646 is mislabeled in Ihnssen et al. 2011 as Ganoderma adspersum 647.