Literature DB >> 33803205

The Early Fragmentation of a Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen Barrier Membrane Contributes to Transmembraneous Vascularization-A Possible Paradigm Shift for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Eleni Kapogianni1, Said Alkildani2, Milena Radenkovic3, Xin Xiong4, Rumen Krastev4,5, Ignacio Stöwe6,7, James Bielenstein2, Ole Jung7, Stevo Najman8, Mike Barbeck2,9, Daniel Rothamel10,11.   

Abstract

Collagen-based barrier membranes are an essential component in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. They act as cell-occlusive devices that should maintain a micromilieu where bone tissue can grow, which in turn provides a stable bed for prosthetic implantation. However, the standing time of collagen membranes has been a challenging area, as native membranes are often prematurely resorbed. Therefore, consolidation techniques, such as chemical cross-linking, have been used to enhance the structural integrity of the membranes, and by consequence, their standing time. However, these techniques have cytotoxic tendencies and can cause exaggerated inflammation and in turn, premature resorption, and material failures. However, tissues from different extraction sites and animals are variably cross-linked. For the present in vivo study, a new collagen membrane based on bovine dermis was extracted and compared to a commercially available porcine-sourced collagen membrane extracted from the pericardium. The membranes were implanted in Wistar rats for up to 60 days. The analyses included well-established histopathological and histomorphometrical methods, including histochemical and immunohistochemical staining procedures, to detect M1- and M2-macrophages as well as blood vessels. Initially, the results showed that both membranes remained intact up to day 30, while the bovine membrane was fragmented at day 60 with granulation tissue infiltrating the implantation beds. In contrast, the porcine membrane remained stable without signs of material-dependent inflammatory processes. Therefore, the bovine membrane showed a special integration pattern as the fragments were found to be overlapping, providing secondary porosity in combination with a transmembraneous vascularization. Altogether, the bovine membrane showed comparable results to the porcine control group in terms of biocompatibility and standing time. Moreover, blood vessels were found within the bovine membranes, which can potentially serve as an additional functionality of barrier membranes that conventional barrier membranes do not provide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR); barrier membrane; bovine collagen; bovine dermis; porcine collagen; porcine pericardium; tissue regeneration; tissue source; transmembraneous vascularization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33803205      PMCID: PMC7999168          DOI: 10.3390/membranes11030185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Membranes (Basel)        ISSN: 2077-0375


  53 in total

Review 1.  Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen.

Authors:  A K Lynn; I V Yannas; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 2.  Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen barrier membranes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Jan Behring; Rüdiger Junker; X Frank Walboomers; Betsy Chessnut; John A Jansen
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Porcine Dermis and Pericardium-Based, Non-Cross-Linked Materials Induce Multinucleated Giant Cells After Their In Vivo Implantation: A Physiological Reaction?

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Jonas Lorenz; Marzellus Grosse Holthaus; Nina Raetscho; Alica Kubesch; Patrick Booms; Robert Sader; Charles James Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Bone Augmentation Techniques for Horizontal and Vertical Alveolar Ridge Deficiency in Oral Implantology.

Authors:  Len Tolstunov; John F Eric Hamrick; Vishtasb Broumand; Dekel Shilo; Adi Rachmiel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 5.  Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system.

Authors:  Ziad Julier; Anthony J Park; Priscilla S Briquez; Mikaël M Martino
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Sinus Floor Elevation Using the Lateral Approach and Window Repositioning and a Xenogeneic Bone Substitute as a Grafting Material: A Histologic, Histomorphometric, and Radiographic Analysis.

Authors:  Georges Tawil; Mike Barbeck; Ronald Unger; Peter Tawil; Franck Witte
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Heterogeneity of biomaterial-induced multinucleated giant cells: Possible importance for the regeneration process?

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Antonella Motta; Claudio Migliaresi; Robert Sader; Charles James Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Scaffold vascularization in vivo driven by primary human osteoblasts in concert with host inflammatory cells.

Authors:  Shahram Ghanaati; Ronald E Unger; Matthew J Webber; Mike Barbeck; Carina Orth; Jenny A Kirkpatrick; Patrick Booms; Antonella Motta; Claudio Migliaresi; Robert A Sader; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  TRAP-Positive Multinucleated Giant Cells Are Foreign Body Giant Cells Rather Than Osteoclasts: Results From a Split-Mouth Study in Humans.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Alica Kubesch; Tadas Korzinskas; Mike Barbeck; Constantin Landes; Robert A Sader; Charles J Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 10.  Membranes for the Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sang-Woon Lee; Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-11-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the Validity of Enzymatic and Immunohistochemical Detection of Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) in the Context of Biocompatibility Analyses of Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Anne-Kathrin Jung; Ole Jung; Said Alkildani; Daniel Rothamel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  In Vivo Analysis of the Immune Response to Strontium- and Copper-doped Bioglass.

Authors:  Denis Rimashevskiy; Franziska Schmidt; Mike Barbeck; Said Alkildani; Armando Mandlule; Milena Radenković; Stevo Najman; Sanja Stojanović; Ole Jung; Yanru Ren; Baoyi Cai; Oliver Görke
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Biocompatibility Assessment of Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Nanobioglass (n-BG) Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Jorge Iván Castro; Carlos Humberto Valencia Llano; Diego López Tenorio; Marcela Saavedra; Paula Zapata; Diana Paola Navia-Porras; Johannes Delgado-Ospina; Manuel N Chaur; José Hermínsul Mina Hernández; Carlos David Grande-Tovar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a Novel Barrier Membrane Based on Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).

Authors:  Carolin Lindner; Said Alkildani; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.