| Literature DB >> 31258772 |
Xiaoyu Wang1, Jingjing Guo2, Dongxiao Gu2,3, Ying Yang2, Xuejie Yang2, Keyu Zhu2.
Abstract
Due to various environmental pollution issues, cancers have become the "first killer" of human beings in the 21st century and their control has become a global strategy of human health. The increasing development of emerging information technologies has provided opportunities for prevention, early detection, diagnosis, intervention, prognosis, nursing, and rehabilitation of cancers. In recent years, the literature associated with emerging technologies in cancer has grown rapidly, but few studies have used bibliometrics and a visualization approach to conduct deep mining and reveal a panorama of this field. To explore the dynamic knowledge evolution of emerging information technologies in cancer literature, we comprehensively analyzed the development status and research hotspots in this field from bibliometrics perspective. We collected 7,136 articles (2000-2017) from the Web of Science database and visually displayed the dynamic knowledge evolution process via the analysis on time-sequence changes, spatial distribution, knowledge base, and hotspots. Much institutional cooperation occurs in this field, and research groups are relatively concentrated. BMC Bioinformatics, PLOS One, Journal of Urology, Scientific Reports, and Bioinformatics are the top five journals in this field. Research hotspots are mainly concentrated in two dimensions: the disease dimension (e.g., cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer), and the technical dimension (e.g., robotics, machine learning, data mining, and etc.). The emerging technologies in cancer research is fast ascending and promising. This study also provides researchers with panoramic knowledge of this field, as well as research hotspots and future directions.Entities:
Keywords: bibliometrics; cancers; emerging information technology; hotspots; knowledge evolution
Year: 2019 PMID: 31258772 PMCID: PMC6584937 DOI: 10.7150/jca.32739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Fig 1Annual number of published articles.
Fig 2Annual number of authors.
Fig 3Average number of co-authors per article.
Institutions and the number of articles published (70 or more).
| Institution | No. of published articles | Local Citation Score (LCS) | Global Citation Score (GCS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University | 112 | 213 | 5307 |
| Stanford University | 90 | 145 | 2692 |
| National Cancer Institute | 89 | 191 | 3172 |
| Johns Hopkins University | 86 | 174 | 2732 |
| University Michigan | 79 | 130 | 2496 |
| University Penn | 79 | 120 | 1614 |
| University Toronto | 77 | 37 | 1228 |
| University Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | 76 | 93 | 1049 |
| Yonsei University | 71 | 125 | 1093 |
Fig 4Institutional collaboration network.
Countries/regions with 200 or more published articles.
| Nation or region | No. of published articles | LCS | Centrality |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA | 2711 | 4352 | 0.25 |
| Mainland China | 756 | 357 | 0.05 |
| UK | 569 | 754 | 0.31 |
| India | 393 | 118 | 0.13 |
| Germany | 392 | 503 | 0.01 |
| Italy | 374 | 459 | 0.05 |
| Canada | 330 | 277 | 0.09 |
| South Korea | 270 | 299 | 0.02 |
| France | 262 | 267 | 0.11 |
| Spain | 236 | 331 | 0.14 |
| Taiwan(region) | 220 | 299 | 0.02 |
| Australia | 213 | 236 | 0.14 |
Fig 5National collaboration network.
Top 10 authors.
| Authors | Recs | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menon M | 44 | 395 | 3792 |
| Li CF | 35 | 69 | 232 |
| Wang J | 33 | 39 | 252 |
| Madabhushi A | 29 | 38 | 363 |
| Patel VR | 28 | 217 | 1916 |
| Kim S | 27 | 10 | 212 |
| Li J | 25 | 23 | 518 |
| Liu Y | 24 | 14 | 161 |
| Hemal AK | 22 | 65 | 474 |
| Wang Y | 22 | 47 | 429 |
Fig 6Co-author network in emerging technologies in cancer literature.
Top 15 journals with most published articles related to emerging technologies in cancer.
| NO | Journal | Recs | LCS | GCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BMC Bioinformatics | 133 | 0 | 3872 |
| 2 | PLOS One | 128 | 0 | 1385 |
| 3 | Journal of Urology | 116 | 719 | 5873 |
| 4 | Scientific Reports | 83 | 0 | 291 |
| 5 | Bioinformatics | 80 | 528 | 5305 |
| 6 | Expert Systems with Applications | 78 | 298 | 1692 |
| 7 | Journal of Biomedical Informatics | 71 | 84 | 926 |
| 8 | BJU International | 67 | 241 | 1697 |
| 9 | Oncotarget | 65 | 3 | 112 |
| 10 | European Urology | 59 | 518 | 4565 |
| 11 | Medical Physics | 58 | 85 | 628 |
| 12 | Artificial Intelligence in Medicine | 56 | 270 | 1657 |
| 13 | Computers in Biology and Medicine | 46 | 95 | 498 |
| 14 | International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery | 43 | 68 | 603 |
| 15 | BMC Genomics | 42 | 0 | 375 |
Co-occurrence frequency TOP10 keywords
| Keywords | Frequency | Centrality |
|---|---|---|
| cancer | 1378 | 0.44 |
| classification | 1088 | 0.49 |
| breast cancer | 800 | 0.09 |
| robotics | 784 | 0.43 |
| machine learning | 674 | 0.15 |
| data mining | 607 | 0.09 |
| prediction | 465 | 0.11 |
| support vector machine | 403 | 0.14 |
| prostate cancer | 380 | 0.04 |
| feature selection | 372 | 0.02 |
Fig 7Keywords co-occurrence network