| Literature DB >> 33802727 |
Ximena Alvial1, Alejandra Rojas2, Raúl Carrasco3,4, Claudia Durán5, Christian Fernández-Campusano6.
Abstract
The Public Health Service in Chile consists of different levels of complexity and coverage depending on the severity and degree of specialization of the pathology to be treated. From primary to tertiary care, tertiary care is highly complex and has low coverage. This work focuses on an analysis of the public health system with emphasis on the healthcare network and tertiary care, whose objectives are designed to respond to the needs of each patient. A review of the literature and a field study of the problem of studying the perception of internal and external users is presented. This study intends to be a contribution in the detection of opportunities for the relevant actors and the processes involved through the performance of Triage. The main causes and limitations of the excessive use of emergency services in Chile are analyzed and concrete proposals are generated aiming to benefit clinical care in emergency services. Finally, improvements related to management are proposed and the main aspects are determined to improve decision-making in hospitals, which could be a contribution to public health policies.Entities:
Keywords: Chilean health system; emergency service; triage
Year: 2021 PMID: 33802727 PMCID: PMC8002495 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Number of emergency, primary and specialty care attentions per Region in 2017 and population according to 2017 census.
| Region | Emergency Care | Primary Care | Specialties Care | Total | Emergency | People in Health | Population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Care | 1000 in hab. | 10,000 in hab. | ||
| Arica and Parinacota | 188,358 | 38.1% | 175,268 | 35.4% | 130,961 | 26.5% | 494,587 | 833 | 189 | 226,068 |
| Tarapacá | 442,356 | 48.6% | 332,969 | 36.6% | 134,111 | 14.7% | 909,436 | 1338 | 177 | 330,558 |
| Antofagasta | 512,673 | 44.3% | 387,985 | 33.5% | 256,491 | 22.2% | 1,157,149 | 844 | 182 | 607,534 |
| Atacama | 343,906 | 49.0% | 230,483 | 32.9% | 126,833 | 18.1% | 701,222 | 1202 | 146 | 286,168 |
| Coquimbo | 768,004 | 43.8% | 639,912 | 36.5% | 346,521 | 19.8% | 1,754,437 | 1014 | 164 | 757,586 |
| Valparaíso | 2,092,230 | 46.9% | 1,641,461 | 36.8% | 724,375 | 16.2% | 4,458,066 | 1152 | 226 | 1,815,902 |
| Metropolitan of Santiago | 6,666,899 | 40.9% | 6,445,116 | 39.5% | 3,203,522 | 19.6% | 16,315,537 | 937 | 274 | 7,112,808 |
| Libertador General Bernardo O’Higgins | 993,010 | 42.3% | 980,250 | 41.7% | 375,563 | 16.0% | 2,348,823 | 1086 | 177 | 914,555 |
| Maule | 1,407,230 | 46.5% | 1,096,038 | 36.2% | 523,404 | 17.3% | 3,026,672 | 1347 | 175 | 1,044,950 |
| Biobío and Ñuble | 2,778,550 | 43.4% | 2,482,816 | 38.7% | 1,146,719 | 17.9% | 6,408,085 | 1364 | 219 | 2037,414 |
| La Araucanía | 1,281,165 | 44.4% | 1,168,756 | 40.5% | 437,066 | 15.1% | 2,886,987 | 1338 | 198 | 957,224 |
| Los Ríos | 547,319 | 47.5% | 393,777 | 34.2% | 211,553 | 18.4% | 1,152,649 | 1422 | 204 | 384,837 |
| Los Lagos | 1,022,731 | 46.1% | 786,680 | 35.4% | 410,217 | 18.5% | 2,219,628 | 1234 | 198 | 828,708 |
| Aysén of general Carlos lbáñez del Campo | 131,300 | 38.1% | 126,528 | 36.7% | 86,929 | 25.2% | 344,757 | 1273 | 247 | 103,158 |
| Magallanes and Chilean Antartic | 206,326 | 45.6% | 121,621 | 26.9% | 124,699 | 27.5% | 452,646 | 1239 | 256 | 166,533 |
| Total country | 19,382,057 | 43.4% | 17,009,660 | 38.1% | 8,238,964 | 18.5% | 44,630,681 | 1103 | 229 | 17,574,003 |
Human health care and social assistance activities, census 2017.
Figure 1Emergencies and people in health care system.
Description of the Triage categorization method.
| Category | Description of Seriousness |
|---|---|
| C1 | Patients in vital risk, i.e., those that require reanimation and/or immediate stabilization, because of the imminent vital risk. They have direct priority access to the reanimation box, and their attention must be immediate. Whoever recognizes the patient emergency activates the emergency alarm. |
| C2 | High complexity patients that require diagnostic and/or therapeutic actions, such as an evaluation, treatment and control for a period of time, which may require hospitalization and/or specialists’ consultation. Its most frequent characteristic is hemodynamics instability. The patient goes quickly to the box and the waiting time must not be more than 10 min. |
| C3 | Medium complexity patients that due to the nature of their pathology require diagnostic-therapeutic measures to determine a brief period of observation and subsequent discharge. The patient goes to the medical care box, where they are evaluated by the doctor according to availability. The waiting time should not be more than 60 min. |
| C4 | Patients with no real emergency. They are patients requiring a diagnostic procedure or a therapeutical one, including medical attention. |
| C5 | General consultation, i.e., any clinical situation that appears spontaneously and/or for a long-term that can produce only general discomfort in the patient. Because of the associated clinical condition, both the medical attention as well as the initial indication of treatment can be solved through the Primary Health Care (PHC). |
Figure 2Activities in an average emergency care.
Average waiting times for patients attending an Emergency Department (Average time in minutes).
| TRIAGE | TRIAGE Categorization | Medical Evaluation | Clinical Procedures | Medical Reassessment | Referral, Transfer or Hospitalization | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | As these are life-threatened patients, waiting times from C2 to C5 are not generated | |||||
| C2 | 18.1 | 22.2 | 32.5 | 38.2 | 37.5 | 148.5 |
| C3 | 32.3 | 48.5 | 70.4 | 49.6 | 188.7 | 389.5 |
| C4 | 40.5 | 90.3 | 75.5 | 128.4 | 52.7 | 387.4 |
| C5 | 39.2 | 101.9 | 98.3 | 196.8 | 64.3 | 500.5 |
Proposal, Description, Measurement and Observations of the detected opportunities.
| Proposal | Causes of the Problem of Interest | Description of the Solution | Measurement | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) New and better information channels | Poor coordination between the patients and the health providers. | Generation of new information channels making the distinction of the existence of a particular channel for the health center, the patients, and between them. Improve the connection of the information channels with the external user with the aim of guiding them in relation to the corresponding healthcare network, and improving the management of the reservation of medical appointments. | Impact | Patients would find themselves informed about the health centers and about the management of the reservation of medical appointments. |
| (2) Definition of medical care flows | Hospitals have legal obligations according to law, causing saturation of the system. | Definition of care flows for the different category of patients, such as a fast tracking or area for quick attention of C4 and C5 patients, leaving the observation areas only for the patients that can develop changes in their health state, such as C2 and C3 patients that have more probabilities of worsening or improving their condition. Management of the medium severity and not serious patients (C3-C4) demand can reduce the waiting time that can put in danger the care or the resources intended for the serious ill patients; as well as improve the perception of the service. | Effectiveness | It would considerably improve medical care flows. It requires the reinforcement of the medical staff and the infrastructure of the place. |
| (3) Generation of incentives | Lack of incentive for general practitioners and health professionals who are part of the PHC structure. | Generate an incentive in the health professionals so that the bet is the contribution of the public health service. To obtain more professionals that can give responses to the population. | Impact/ Effectiveness | The increase of the budget is required for public health. |
| (4) Promotion of training in the professionals of the PHC | Patients have limited access to the PHC. | Promotion of the training of decision-making skills in the primary attention professionals, through the specialization in family medicine so they can give an accurate diagnosis, in order to educate the population in relation to their health condition. | Efectiveness | The doctor must have received professional training, and later made an effort through some type of integral training, diplomas and/or Master’s among others to favour this opportunity. |
| (5) Promote emergency medicine training | Few economic resources earmarked for the hiring of more professionals for the public health network in the three levels of attention. | Promotion of emergency medicine training for those who dedicate themselves to this type of attention, so they can sharpen their clinical eye on the immediate response. | Effectiveness | The doctor must have received professional training, and later make an effort through some type of integral training, diplomas and/or Master’s among others to favour this opportunity. |
| (6) Use of ICT | There is not always a medical record of the patients who go to the Emergency Services. | Use of ICT to create systems allowing the access to the medical history of the patients, making this information available in any type of facility where the patient has arrived to ask for care. | Impact/ Effectiveness | It will allow a prompt medical care through accessing the clinical history of the person attended, helping the diagnosis be faster and more accurate. |
| (7) Generation of interrelation and coordination mechanisms | Poor coordination between the patients and the health providers. | Generation of interrelations and coordination mechanisms among the three levels of care: primary, secondary and tertiary. | Impact | It will favor the communication and will be a more effective provision of services among all the actors. |
| (8) Pre-classification methodology | Hospitals have legal obligations according to law, causing saturation of the system. | Use of a pre-classification methodology of patients that reinforces the Triage [ | Effectiveness | It could be effective as long as the demand of staff is reinforced. On the contrary, it would be difficult for the simple fact that the experience is what determines, most of the time, the emergency that the patient is facing. |
| (9) Development of telemedicine in some specialties | Patients have limited Access to the PHC. | Promotion of the use and development of telemedicine in some medical specialties to favor a more efficient and faster care flow in terms of immediate responses. | Impact | Its use will help various specialties which can be cared for from distance so it does not generate an increased flow of patients. In addition, this will allow the generation of a follow-up of the condition of the more immediate patient. |
Figure 3Valuation of proposals for improvements by experts in Emergency Medicine, with 21 responses [58].