Manish N Shah1,2,3, Erin B Wasserman1,2, Hongyue Wang4, Suzanne M Gillespie1,3, Katia Noyes2,5, Nancy E Wood1, Dallas Nelson3, Ann Dozier2, Kenneth M McConnochie6. 1. 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry , Rochester, New York. 2. 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry , Rochester, New York. 3. 3 Division of Geriatrics & Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry , Rochester, New York. 4. 4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry , Rochester, New York. 5. 5 Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry , Rochester, New York. 6. 6 Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry , Rochester, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The failure to provide timely acute illness care can lead to adverse consequences or emergency department (ED) use. We evaluated the effect on ED use of a high-intensity telemedicine program that provides acute illness care for senior living community (SLC) residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study over 3.5 years. Six SLCs cared for by a primary care geriatrics practice were intervention facilities, with the remaining 16 being controls. Consenting patients at intervention facilities could access telemedicine for acute illness care. Patients were provided patient-to-provider, real-time, or store-and-forward high-intensity telemedicine (i.e., technician-assisted with resources beyond simple videoconferencing) to diagnose and treat acute illnesses. The primary outcome was the rate of ED use. RESULTS: We enrolled 494 of 705 (70.1%) subjects/proxies in the intervention group; 1,058 subjects served as controls. Control and intervention subjects visited the ED 2,238 and 725 times, respectively, with 47.3% of control and 43.4% of intervention group visits resulting in discharge home. Among intervention subjects, ED use decreased at an annualized rate of 18% (rate ratio [RR]=0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.95), whereas in the control group there was no statistically significant change in ED use (RR=1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.07; p=0.009 for group-by-time interaction). Primary care use and mortality were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity telemedicine significantly reduced ED use among SLC residents without increasing other utilization or mortality. This alternative to traditional acute illness care can enhance access to acute illness care and should be integrated into population health programs.
BACKGROUND: The failure to provide timely acute illness care can lead to adverse consequences or emergency department (ED) use. We evaluated the effect on ED use of a high-intensity telemedicine program that provides acute illness care for senior living community (SLC) residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study over 3.5 years. Six SLCs cared for by a primary care geriatrics practice were intervention facilities, with the remaining 16 being controls. Consenting patients at intervention facilities could access telemedicine for acute illness care. Patients were provided patient-to-provider, real-time, or store-and-forward high-intensity telemedicine (i.e., technician-assisted with resources beyond simple videoconferencing) to diagnose and treat acute illnesses. The primary outcome was the rate of ED use. RESULTS: We enrolled 494 of 705 (70.1%) subjects/proxies in the intervention group; 1,058 subjects served as controls. Control and intervention subjects visited the ED 2,238 and 725 times, respectively, with 47.3% of control and 43.4% of intervention group visits resulting in discharge home. Among intervention subjects, ED use decreased at an annualized rate of 18% (rate ratio [RR]=0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.95), whereas in the control group there was no statistically significant change in ED use (RR=1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.07; p=0.009 for group-by-time interaction). Primary care use and mortality were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity telemedicine significantly reduced ED use among SLC residents without increasing other utilization or mortality. This alternative to traditional acute illness care can enhance access to acute illness care and should be integrated into population health programs.
Authors: Rashid L Bashshur; Joel D Howell; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kathryn M Harms; Noura Bashshur; Charles R Doarn Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Mary K Finta; Amy Borkenhagen; Nicole E Werner; Joyce Duckles; Craig R Sellers; Sandhya Seshadri; Denise Lampo; Manish N Shah Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-05-15
Authors: Sabine E Lemoyne; Hanne H Herbots; Dennis De Blick; Roy Remmen; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Peter Van Bogaert Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Ximena Alvial; Alejandra Rojas; Raúl Carrasco; Claudia Durán; Christian Fernández-Campusano Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Caroline Lang; Martin Roessler; Jochen Schmitt; Antje Bergmann; Vjera Holthoff-Detto Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.147