| Literature DB >> 33802525 |
Yuki Tanisaka1, Masafumi Mizuide1, Akashi Fujita1, Tomoya Ogawa1, Masahiro Suzuki1, Hiromune Katsuda1, Youichi Saito1, Kazuya Miyaguchi1, Tomoaki Tashima1, Yumi Mashimo1, Shomei Ryozawa1.
Abstract
The diagnostic process for biliary strictures remains challenging in some cases. A broad differential diagnosis exists for indeterminate biliary strictures, including benign or malignant lesions. The diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures requires a combination of physical examination, laboratory testing, imaging modalities, and endoscopic procedures. Despite the progress of less invasive imaging modalities such as transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopy plays an essential role in the accurate diagnosis, including the histological diagnosis. Imaging findings and brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy under fluoroscopic guidance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are widely used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of biliary strictures. However, ERCP cannot provide an intraluminal view of the biliary lesion, and its outcomes are not satisfactory. Recently, peroral cholangioscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration have been reported as useful for indeterminate biliary strictures. Appropriate endoscopic modalities need to be selected according to the patient's condition, the lesion, and the expertise of the endoscopist. The aim of this review article is to discuss the diagnostic process for indeterminate biliary strictures using endoscopy.Entities:
Keywords: ERCP; EUS; EUS-FNA; biliary strictures; cholangioscopy; confocal laser endomicroscopy; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; endoscopic ultrasound
Year: 2021 PMID: 33802525 PMCID: PMC7961606 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241