Literature DB >> 33802525

Diagnostic Process Using Endoscopy for Biliary Strictures: A Narrative Review.

Yuki Tanisaka1, Masafumi Mizuide1, Akashi Fujita1, Tomoya Ogawa1, Masahiro Suzuki1, Hiromune Katsuda1, Youichi Saito1, Kazuya Miyaguchi1, Tomoaki Tashima1, Yumi Mashimo1, Shomei Ryozawa1.   

Abstract

The diagnostic process for biliary strictures remains challenging in some cases. A broad differential diagnosis exists for indeterminate biliary strictures, including benign or malignant lesions. The diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures requires a combination of physical examination, laboratory testing, imaging modalities, and endoscopic procedures. Despite the progress of less invasive imaging modalities such as transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopy plays an essential role in the accurate diagnosis, including the histological diagnosis. Imaging findings and brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy under fluoroscopic guidance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are widely used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of biliary strictures. However, ERCP cannot provide an intraluminal view of the biliary lesion, and its outcomes are not satisfactory. Recently, peroral cholangioscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration have been reported as useful for indeterminate biliary strictures. Appropriate endoscopic modalities need to be selected according to the patient's condition, the lesion, and the expertise of the endoscopist. The aim of this review article is to discuss the diagnostic process for indeterminate biliary strictures using endoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERCP; EUS; EUS-FNA; biliary strictures; cholangioscopy; confocal laser endomicroscopy; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; endoscopic ultrasound

Year:  2021        PMID: 33802525      PMCID: PMC7961606          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  88 in total

1.  Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: in comparison with CEA.

Authors:  Xing-Lei Qin; Zhuo-Ren Wang; Jing-Sen Shi; Min Lu; Lin Wang; Quan-Ru He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Donald Garrow; Scott Miller; Debajyoti Sinha; Jason Conway; Brenda J Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Direct endoscopic visualization of the bile and pancreatic duct systems by peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy (PCPS).

Authors:  M Nakajima; Y Akasaka; K Yamaguchi; S Fujimoto; K Kawai
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases.

Authors:  C J Stewart; P R Mills; R Carter; J O'Donohue; G Fullarton; C W Imrie; W R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a multicenter experience.

Authors:  Alexander Meining; Yang K Chen; Douglas Pleskow; Peter Stevens; Raj J Shah; Ram Chuttani; Joel Michalek; Adam Slivka
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Validation of the diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the characterization of indeterminate biliary strictures: results of a prospective multicenter international study.

Authors:  Adam Slivka; Ian Gan; Priya Jamidar; Guido Costamagna; Paola Cesaro; Marc Giovannini; Fabrice Caillol; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Performance of a fully disposable, digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscope.

Authors:  Raj J Shah; Isaac Raijman; Brian Brauer; Bora Gumustop; Douglas K Pleskow
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture.

Authors:  L A Desa; A B Akosa; S Lazzara; P Domizio; T Krausz; I S Benjamin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  The role of intraductal ultrasonography in pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Bing Hu
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

10.  Integrating next-generation sequencing to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-obtained biliary specimens improves the detection and management of patients with malignant bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Marina N Nikiforova; Jennifer Chennat; Georgios I Papachristou; Asif Khalid; Mordechai Rabinovitz; Rohit Das; Savreet Sarkaria; M Samir Ayasso; Abigail I Wald; Sara E Monaco; Michael Nalesnik; N Paul Ohori; David Geller; Allan Tsung; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert Zeh; J Wallis Marsh; Melissa Hogg; Kenneth Lee; David L Bartlett; James F Pingpank; Abhinav Humar; Nathan Bahary; Anil K Dasyam; Randall Brand; Kenneth E Fasanella; Kevin McGrath; Adam Slivka
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Choledochoscopy: An update.

Authors:  Tsinrong Lee; Thomas Zheng Jie Teng; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-16

2.  Peroral Cholangioscopy-Guided Targeted Biopsy versus Conventional Endoscopic Transpapillary Forceps Biopsy for Biliary Stricture with Suspected Bile Duct Cancer.

Authors:  Katsunori Sekine; Ichiro Yasuda; Shinpei Doi; Noriyuki Kuniyoshi; Takayuki Tsujikawa; Yuichi Takano; Masatoshi Mabuchi; Kosuke Takahashi; Masashi Kawamoto; Mikiko Takahashi; Tatsuya Aso; Tatsuhiko Miyazaki; Takuji Iwashita
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Biliary Tree Diagnostics: Advances in Endoscopic Imaging and Tissue Sampling.

Authors:  Matteo Ghisa; Angelo Bellumat; Manuela De Bona; Flavio Valiante; Marco Tollardo; Gaia Riguccio; Angelo Iacobellis; Edoardo Savarino; Andrea Buda
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.