| Literature DB >> 33802022 |
Helle Samdal1,2, Lene C Olsen2,3, Knut S Grøn2, Elin S Røyset2,4, Therese S Høiem2, Ingunn Nervik2, Pål Sætrom1,2,3,5, Arne Wibe2,6, Svanhild A Schønberg2, Caroline H H Pettersen2,6.
Abstract
Cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) better preserve tumor characteristics and microenvironment than traditional cancer cell line derived xenografts and are becoming a valuable model in translational cancer research and personalized medicine. We have established a PDX model for colorectal cancer (CRC) in CIEA NOG mice with a 50% engraftment rate. Tumor fragments from patients with CRC (n = 5) were engrafted in four mice per tumor (n = 20). Mice with established PDXs received a liquid diet enriched with fish oil or placebo, and fatty acid profiling was performed to measure fatty acid content in whole blood. Moreover, a biobank consisting of tissue and blood samples from patients was established. Histology, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization procedures were used for staining of tumor and xenograft tissue slides. Results demonstrate that key histological characteristics of the patients' tumors were retained in the established PDXs, and the liquid diets were consumed as intended by the mice. Some of the older mice developed lymphomas that originated from human Ki67+, CD45+, and EBV+ lymphoid cells. We present a detailed description of the process and methodology, as well as possible issues that may arise, to refine the method and improve PDX engraftment rate for future studies. The established PDX model for CRC can be used for exploring different cancer treatment regimes, and liquid diets enriched with fish oil may be successfully delivered to the mice through the drinking flasks.Entities:
Keywords: CRC; PDX; colorectal cancer; omega-3 fatty acids; patient-derived xenograft
Year: 2021 PMID: 33802022 PMCID: PMC8000445 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9030282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Study design for the establishment of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) in immune suppressed CIEA NOG mice.
Figure 2Tumor tissue sampling for: (a) biobanking and (b) PDX procedure.
Figure 3Tumor tissue fragmentation and naming for PDX procedure and exome sequencing.
Figure 4Experimental design of PDX of CRC in mice. C = control/placebo, ω-3 = omega-3, HEP = humane endpoint. Part of the figure is modified from [14] with approval.
Figure 5Blood sampling by puncturing: (a) vena saphena and (b) the heart.
Patient and tumor characteristics (n = 5), and questionnaire answers.
| Patient 3 | Patient 11 | Patient 17 | Patient 18 | Patient 19 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (Male/Female) | M | F | M | M | M |
| Age | 69 | 65 | 77 | 62 | 65 |
| Tumor site | Colon | Colon | Colon | Rectum | Rectum |
| Tumor anatomy | Exophytic | Stenosing, ulcerating | Stricturating, ulcerating | Ulcerating | Exophytic, ulcerating |
| Tumor type | Adenocarcinoma | Signet cell carcinoma | Adenocarcinoma with mucus | Adenocarcinoma | Adenocarcinoma |
| Tumor stage (TMN) | T3N0M0 | T3N2M0 | T4N0M0 | T4aN1M0 | T3N0M0 |
| Tumor differentiation grade | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3.7 |
| Tumor MSI status | MSI-high | MSS | MSS | MSS | |
| Mutations | BRAF | BRAF | KRAS | ||
| Pre-operative cancer treatment | No | No | No | No | No |
| Previous cancer diagnoses | Yes | No | |||
| Intake of omega-3 supplements | 0–3/month | 0–3/month | 0–3/month | 0–3/month | 0–3/month |
| Intake of cod liver oil | 0–3/month | 0–3/month | Daily | 0–3/month | Daily 1 |
| Intake of fish | 1–3/week | 1–3/week | 1–3/week | 1–3/week | 1–3/week |
| Use of lipid reducing medication | No | No | No | Yes | No |
1 Daily intake of cod liver oil only in the wintertime (September to April). The blood sample was taken in August.
Figure 6Pathology of CRC tumors from patients (p) 3, 11, 17, 18 and 19.
Animal and engraftment details.
| Patient ID | Patient 3 | Patient 11 | Patient 17 | Patient 18 | Patient 19 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse ID | 12 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 18 |
| Tumor fragment ID | 1a | 1b | 2a | 2b | 1a | 1b | 2a | 2b | 1a | 1b | 2a | 2b | 1a | 1b | 2a | 2b | 1a | 1b | 2a | 2b |
| Ear clip | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Age at engraftment (week) | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Tumor fragment size (mm3) | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Days to established growth | - | 64 | 64 | 99 | 70 | 34 | 91 | 34 | 185 | - | 174 | 52 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Figure 7Implantation of a tumor fragment into immune suppressed CIEA NOG mouse #31.
Figure 8PDX growth curves for: (a) all mice; (b) mouse #12, 15, 16 and 17 (tumor fragments from patient 3); (c) mouse #19, 20, 21 and 22 (tumor fragments from patient 11) and; (d) mouse #23, 24, 25 and 26 (tumor fragments from patient 17).
Figure 9Images of PDX growth (red ring) for mouse #26 (patient 17). Secondary tumor from week 10 (blue ring). Numbers are millimeter (mm) length of the tumor in two dimensions. W = week, d = days.
Figure 10Images of 9 of 10 established PDXs, taken at the day of euthanization. Mouse #17 died during the anesthetic procedure (isoflurane) when assessing tumor size and the tumor was not sampled.
Characteristics of all mice at the time of euthanization.
| Mouse # | Clinical Symptoms & Comments | Necropsy Findings | Body Weight | PDX Size (mm) | Second Tumor Size (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | PDX not growing after 6 months. | Only a spot at engraftment side. Dark cystic structure close to pancreas. | Stable | - | - |
| 15 | Placebo treatment until PDX max size. | Large solid tumor. | Stable | 10 × 15.5 | - |
| 16 | Smartfish Remune treatment until PDX max size. | Large tumor, partly with liquid. Visible blood veins to tumor. | Stable | 11.5 × 13 | - |
| 17 | Smartfish Remune treatment until it died during anesthesia. | No samples taken. | Stable | 7.5 × 7.5 | - |
| 19 | Ulcerating xenograft. Smartfish Remune treatment. | Large solid tumor with blood traces. | Slightly reduced | 11.3 × 12 | - |
| 20 | Placebo treatment until PDX reached max size. | Large solid tumor. | −10–20% | 11.5 × 17 | - |
| 21 | Reduced general health and reduced weight. Large PDX. | Solid tumor. Low blood volume. No samples taken. | −10–15% | 7 × 9 | - |
| 22 | Smartfish Remune treatment until PDX max size. | Large solid tumor w/visible blood veins. | Stable | 11 × 17 | - |
| 23 | Reduced weight. Placebo treatment (8 weeks). Possibly rectal prolapse. | Small spleen. Second tumor with dark liquid inside. Clog of fur and food in stomach. | −10–20% | 5.8 × 5.9 | 7 × 9 |
| 24 | Did not reach “established growth” 3 months after animals without growing xenografts were euthanized. | Small slowly growing PDX. Whitish lungs. Normal organs. | Stable | 3.9 × 4 | - |
| 25 | Reduced general health. Large second tumor | Established growth of PDX. Whitish lungs. Large second tumor left shoulder. | Stable | 5 × 5 | 8 × 10 |
| 26 | Ulcerating xenograft. Smartfish Remune treatment. Large second tumor. | Enlarged spleen w/white fields. Whitish lungs. Two second tumors; left and right shoulder. | −10% | 8 × 8 | 9 × 11 (left) |
| 27 | Abscess mistaken for PDX until it burst. Smartfish Remune treatment. | Wound at the abscess site. Small xenograft under the skin. | Stable | - | - |
| 28 | Abscess mistaken as PDX in the beginning. Placebo treatment | Intact abscess 9.5 × 10 mm containing green liquid. Only a spot at engraftment site | Stable | - | - |
| 29 | Abscess mistaken as PDX until it burst. Smartfish Remune treatment | Wound where abscess has burst. | Stable | - | - |
| 30 | Did not reach “established growth” after 6 months. | Normal organs. A small bump in the liver. Trace of PDX under the skin | Stable | - | - |
| 31 | Did not reach “established growth” after 6 months. | Small xenograft under the skin. Normal organs. | Stable | - | - |
| 32 | Reduced general health. Second tumor. Did not reach “established growth”. Liquid in the eye. | Thick wounded skin at the neck. Whitish lungs. Enlarged spleen >2 cm. | Stable | - | - |
| 33 | Did not reach “established growth”. Large second tumor. | Large second tumor. No visible xenograft. | Stable | - | 9 × 14 |
| 18 | Did not reach “established growth”. Rectal prolapse. | Swollen, bloody anal opening. Whitish part of one lung. Traces of xenograft under skin. Enlarged spleen ca 2.5 cm | −10% | - | - |
Figure 11Pictures of mice developing secondary tumors (mouse #23, 25, 26, 32 and 33) or abscesses (mouse #27, 28 and 29). Numbers represent tumor size in mm.
Figure 12Histopathological comparison of: (a) the five patient CRC tumors and (b) three patient tumors and matched PDX tissue sections. The tissue sections are stained with HES. p = patient, T = tumor, M = mouse, X = xenograft.
Figure 13(a) Tissue collected at necroscopy from mouse #26 and spleen from mouse #12 and (b) HES staining of PDX, spleen, second tumor left shoulder, and lung from mouse #26. Xenograft; necrotic tissue surrounded by lymphoid cancer cells. Spleen/pancreas; lymphoid cancer cells and pale necrotic tissue areas in the spleen. Lung; dense areas with lymphoid cancer cells. Secondary tumor left shoulder; compact tumor with lymphoid cancer cells.
Figure 14Characterization of lymphomas from mouse #25, 26, 32 and 33. HES, Ki67, CD45 and EBV RNA (EBER; see methods) staining.
Figure 15Patient whole blood omega-3 fatty acid (FA) profiling and Omega-3 index.
Figure 16Mouse whole blood FA profiling and Omega-3 index. Stars indicate significant Tukey post hoc test. p-values indicate significance in the ANOVA model.