| Literature DB >> 33801699 |
Nurul Absar1, Jainal Abedin1, Md Mashiur Rahman2, Moazzem Hossain Miah3, Naziba Siddique3, Masud Kamal4, Mantazul Islam Chowdhury4, Abdelmoneim Adam Mohamed Sulieman5, Mohammad Rashed Iqbal Faruque6, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker7, David Andrew Bradley7,8, Abdullah Alsubaie9.
Abstract
Considering the probable health risks due to radioactivity input via drinking tea, the concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th,40K and 137Cs radionuclides in the soil and the corresponding tea leaves of a large tea plantation were measured using high purity germanium (HPGe) γ-ray spectrometry. Different layers of soil and fresh tea leaf samples were collected from the Udalia Tea Estate (UTE) in the Fatickchari area of Chittagong, Bangladesh. The mean concentrations (in Bq/kg) of radionuclides in the studied soil samples were found to be 34 ± 9 to 45 ± 3 for 226Ra, 50 ± 13 to 63 ± 5 for 232Th, 245 ± 30 to 635 ± 35 for 40K and 3 ± 1 to 10 ± 1 for 137Cs, while the respective values in the corresponding tea leaf samples were 3.6 ± 0.7 to 5.7 ± 1.0, 2.4 ± 0.5 to 5.8 ± 0.9, 132 ± 25 to 258 ± 29 and <0.4. The mean transfer factors for 226Ra, 232Th and 40K from soil to tea leaves were calculated to be 0.12, 0.08 and 0.46, respectively, the complete range being 1.1 × 10-2 to 1.0, in accordance with IAEA values. Additionally, the most popularly consumed tea brands available in the Bangladeshi market were also analyzed and, with the exception of 40K, were found to have similar concentrations to the fresh tea leaves collected from the UTE. The committed effective dose via the consumption of tea was estimated to be low in comparison with the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) reference ingestion dose limit of 290 μSv/y. Current indicative tea consumption of 4 g/day/person shows an insignificant radiological risk to public health, while cumulative dietary exposures may not be entirely negligible, because the UNSCEAR reference dose limit is derived from total dietary exposures. This study suggests a periodic monitoring of radiation levels in tea leaves in seeking to ensure the safety of human health.Entities:
Keywords: HPGe γ-ray spectrometry; committed effective dose; soil; tea leaves; terrestrial and anthropogenic radionuclides; threshold consumption rate
Year: 2021 PMID: 33801699 PMCID: PMC8066812 DOI: 10.3390/life11040282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Location of the Udalia Tea Estate at the Fatikchari Upazila of the Chittagong district in Bangladesh.
Figure 2Counting efficiency curve of the HPGe (high-purity germanium) detector.
Concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in the analyzed soil and tea leaf samples (both fresh and marketed tea leaves) and calculated transfer factors from soil-to-tea leaf (fresh tea leaves from UTE (Udalia Tea Estate)).
| Sampling Location | Sample Type | Activity Concentrations (Bq kg−1) Together with Uncertainty | Transfer Factor | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 226Ra | 232Th | 40K | 137Cs | 226Ra | 232Th | 40K | 137Cs | ||
| Location-1 | Garden Tea | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 190 ± 31 | <0.4 | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.69 ± 0.39 | - |
| Soil | 45 ± 3 | 51 ± 1 | 275 ± 80 | 8.5 ± 1 | |||||
| Location-2 | Garden Tea | 3.6 ± 0.7 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 258 ± 29 | <0.4 | 0.11 ± 0.08 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.13 | - |
| Soil | 34 ± 9 | 63 ± 5 | 635 ± 35 | 7 ± 1 | |||||
| Location-3 | Garden Tea | 5.7 ± 1.0 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 175 ± 32 | <0.4 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.16 | - |
| Soil | 37 ± 7 | 50 ± 13 | 391 ± 73 | 9 ± 1 | |||||
| Location-4 | Garden Tea | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 5.8 ± 0.9 | 136 ± 22 | <0.4 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.13 | - |
| Soil | 36 ± 7 | 65 ± 21 | 373 ± 73 | 4 ± 1 | |||||
| Location-5 | Garden Tea | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 5.8 ± 1.1 | 132 ± 25 | <0.4 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.54 ± 0.12 | - |
| Soil | 42 ± 12 | 50 ± 19 | 245 ± 30 | 3 ± 1 | |||||
| Mean | 0.12 ± 0.08 | 0.08 ± 0.05 | 0.46 ± 0.35 | - | |||||
Average activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in tea leaf samples from various countries compared with that from present work.
| Sample Type | Countries | Activity Concentrations (Bq.kg−1) Together with Uncertainties | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 226Ra | 232Th | 40K | 137Cs | |||
| Fresh tea leaf | UTE, Chittagong, Bangladesh | 4.53 ± 0.62 | 4.31 ± 0.58 | 178 ± 28 | <0.4 | Present study |
| Chittagong district, Bangladesh | 5.34 | 10.07 | 429.91 | Not measured | [ | |
| Ramgarh, Bangladesh | 3.20 ± 2.18 | 4.65 ± 1.76 | 625 ± 62.37 | Not measured | [ | |
| Kodala, Bangladesh | 3.56 ± 0.69 | 27.22 ± 3.65 | 1243 ± 83.91 | Not measured | [ | |
| Chandpur Belgaon, Bangladesh | 5.67 ± 2.16 | 12.41 ± 2.82 | 380 ± 62.06 | Not measured | [ | |
| Rize, Turkey | 36.3 ± 6.1 | 23.1 ± 4.8 | 688.4 ± 18.3 | 20.9 ± 3.8 | [ | |
| Market tea leaf | Mostafa-1 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 321 ± 35 | <0.4 | Present study |
| Ceylon | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 244 ± 31 | <0.4 | ||
| Ispahani | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 159 ± 32 | <0.4 | ||
| Taza | 5.4 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 141 ± 29 | <0.4 | ||
| Mostafa | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 183 ± 25 | <0.4 | ||
| Turkey-2 (Market tea) | 0.9 | 2.7 | 501 | - | [ | |
| Serbia-1 (Market tea) | 0.6−8.2 | 1.7−15.1 | 126−1243.7 | - | [ | |
Calculated hazard parameters due to the consumption of studied tea leaves collected from the UTE, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
| Sample | Annual Effective Dose (uSv/y) | Threshold Consumption Rate, kg/y | Lifetime Carcinogenic Risk | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 226Ra | 232Th | 40K | Total | |||
| TL-1 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 5.6 | 77 | 1.40 × 10−5 |
| TL-2 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 5.0 | 88 | 1.24 × 10−5 |
| TL-3 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 90 | 1.20 × 10−5 |
| TL-4 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 4.7 | 93 | 1.17 × 10−5 |
| TL-5 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 4.9 | 89 | 1.22 × 10−5 |
| Mean | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 88 | 1.25 × 10−5 |
Figure 3Dose contribution by individual radionuclides due to the consumption of tea leaves.