Literature DB >> 33801528

The P.I.N.K. Study Approach for Supporting Personalized Risk Assessment and Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Michela Franchini1, Stefania Pieroni1, Edgardo Montrucchio2, Jacopo Nori Cucchiari3, Cosimo Di Maggio4, Enrico Cassano5, Brunella Di Nubila5, Gian Marco Giuseppetti6, Alberto Nicolucci7, Gianfranco Scaperrotta8, Paolo Belli9, Sonia Santicchia10, Sabrina Molinaro1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a clear example of excellent survival when it is detected and properly treated in the early stage. Currently, screening of this cancer relies on mammography, which may be integrated by new imaging techniques for more exhaustive evaluation. The Personalized, Integrated, Network, Knowledge (P.I.N.K.) study is a longitudinal multicentric study involving several diagnostic centres across Italy, co-ordinated by the Italian National Research Council and co-funded by the Umberto Veronesi Foundation. Aim of the study is to evaluate the increased diagnostic accuracy in detecting cancers obtained with different combinations of imaging technologies, and find the most effective diagnostic pathway matching the characteristics of an individual patient. The study foresees the enrolment of 50,000 women over the age of 40 years presenting for breast examination and providing informed consent to data handling. So far, the 15 participating centres across Italy have recruited a total of 22,848 patients. Based on the analyses of the first 175 histopathological-proven breast cancers, mammographic sensitivity was estimated to be 61.7% (n = 108 cancers), whereas diagnostic accuracy increased by 35.5% (n = 44 cancers) when mammography was integrated with other imaging modalities (ultrasound and/or digital breast tomosynthesis). Increase was mainly determined by ultrasound alone. Given the ongoing data collection and recruitment, the number of cancers detected is too low to allow any further in-depth analysis to explore links to patient characteristics. Past studies show that the uniform approach of population screening guidelines should be revised in favour of more personalised regimens, where known standards are integrated by imaging techniques most suitable for the individual's characteristics. With the ultimate goal of identifying early breast cancer detection strategies, our preliminary results suggest that integrated diagnostic approach could lead to a paradigm shift from an age-based regimen toward more specific and effective risk-based personalised screening regimens, in order to reduce mortality from breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; early diagnosis; integrated imaging techniques; personalized medicine; web based data collection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33801528      PMCID: PMC7967589          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  30 in total

Review 1.  ["Breast charter 2004". Diagnostic approach to breast pathology].

Authors:  C Di Maggio; C Del Favero; A Frigerio; G M Giuseppetti; G Gozzi; E Lattanzio; B Pesce; M Rosselli Del Turco; G Simonetti; M A Nosenzo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Predictors of Health Care Use of Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Deborah N N Lo-Fo-Wong; Kate Sitnikova; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Hanneke C J M de Haes
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Nonpalpable breast carcinomas: long-term evaluation of 1,258 cases.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Alberto Luini; Edoardo Botteri; Stefano Zurrida; Simonetta Monti; Viviana Galimberti; Enrico Cassano; Antuono Latronico; Maria Pizzamiglio; Giuseppe Viale; Dario Vezzoli; Nicole Rotmensz; Simona Musmeci; Fabio Bassi; Loredana Burgoa; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giovanni Paganelli; Paolo Veronesi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-12-08

4.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.

Authors:  Sarah M Friedewald; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Stephen L Rose; Melissa A Durand; Donna M Plecha; Julianne S Greenberg; Mary K Hayes; Debra S Copit; Kara L Carlson; Thomas M Cink; Lora D Barke; Linda N Greer; Dave P Miller; Emily F Conant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Interval breast cancer risk associations with breast density, family history and breast tissue aging.

Authors:  Tuong L Nguyen; Shuai Li; Gillian S Dite; Ye K Aung; Christopher F Evans; Ho N Trinh; Laura Baglietto; Jennifer Stone; Yun-Mi Song; Joohon Sung; Dallas R English; Mark A Jenkins; Pierre-Antoine Dugué; Roger L Milne; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; Malcolm C Pike; John L Hopper
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  The incidence of fatal breast cancer measures the increased effectiveness of therapy in women participating in mammography screening.

Authors:  László Tabár; Peter B Dean; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; May Mei-Sheng Ku; Wendy Yi-Ying Wu; Chen-Yang Hsu; Yu-Ching Chen; Kerri Beckmann; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Imaging and cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leonard Fass
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 7.449

Review 10.  Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lulu Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.