| Literature DB >> 33801046 |
Ryan Rienzie1,2, Lasantha Sendanayake3, Devika De Costa1,4, Akbar Hossain5, Marian Brestic6,7, Milan Skalicky7, Pavla Vachova7, Nadeesh M Adassooriya3,8.
Abstract
A novel antimicrobial formulation based on carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) spray-coated Cu2+ intercalated montmorillonite (MMT) nanocomposite material was prepared and its morphology, internal structure, and bonding interactions were studied. Meanwhile, the antibacterial efficacy and release behavior of Cu2+ was also determined. PXRD patterns indicated the intercalation of Cu2+, while FTIR spectra and TGA traces confirmed the association of Cu-MMT with CMC. SEM study revealed the improvement of nanocomposites by CMC, without disturbing the clay structure. TEM and EDAX studies indicated the distribution of Cu (copper) throughout the composite. In vitro antibacterial assays performed with Erwinia carotovora revealed effective bacterial growth suppression, indicating the potential of this material in controlling soft rot of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum); also observed was a connection between growth inhibition and concentration of CMC spray coats indicating a positive relationship between Cu2+ release and concentration of the CMC coatings. The activity pattern of the nanocomposite displayed a significant degree of sustained-release behavior.Entities:
Keywords: Cu2+ ions; Pectobacterium carotovorum; antimicrobial; bacterial soft rot of potato; carboxymethylcellulose; nanoclay; nanocomposite
Year: 2021 PMID: 33801046 PMCID: PMC8004016 DOI: 10.3390/nano11030802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental procedures.
Figure 2PXRD patterns of Na−MMT, CMC, Cu−MMT, and Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Figure 3FTIR spectra for Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Figure 4TGA (which denotes weight loss) and DTA (which denotes derivative weight) profiles for Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Figure 5SEM images of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites (a,b).
Figure 6(a) TEM image of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposite, (b) area considered for EDAX analysis, and (c) EDAX elemental mapping images showing the existence of MMT layers composed of C, O, Al, Si, Cu, and S within the Cu−CMC−MMT nanocomposite.
Figure 7Antibacterial activity of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Diameters of the inhibition zones corresponding to various amounts of composites
| Weight Per Well | 20 mg | 40 mg | 60 mg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite * | Diameters of the inhibition zones (cm) | ||
| C1 | 1.75 (±0.0115) | 2.40 (±0.0) | 2.50 (±0.153) |
| C2 | 1.75 (±0.116) | 2.36 (±0.116) | 2.42 (±0.300) |
| C3 | 1.71 (±0.010) | 2.15 (±0.0115) | 2.20 (±0.015) |
Prior to the antibacterial test, the average Cu content of the composites in triplicate was determined through AAS and found to be 9.2%, 8.6% and 8.2% of Cu by weight respectively, which corresponded to spray coats of 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 g/L (C1 = Cu−MMT−CMC 2.5 g/L, C2 = Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L, C3 = Cu−MMT−CMC, 7.5 g/L). Values given in parentheses in the table include standard errors of means.
Variation of mean percentages of infection by E. carotovora on potato tuber pieces under different treatments
| Treatments | Composite Weight Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 mg | 40 mg | 60 mg | |
| Composite | Mean percentage infection | ||
| C1 | 0.73 (±0.168) | 1.68 (±0.191) | 0.18 (±0.267) |
| C2 | 2.24 (±0.223) | 2.12 (±0.852) | 0.46 (±0.329) |
| C3 | 2.46 (±0.223) | 2.26 (±0.174) | 0.56 (±0.527) |
| Control | 2.51 (±0.142) | 2.51 (±0.142) | 2.51 (±0.142) |
C1 = Cu−MMT−CMC 2.5 g/L, C2 = Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L, C3 = Cu-MMT-CMC, 7.5 g/L; Control: Untreated potato + E. carotovora; Values given in parentheses in the table include standard errors of means.
Figure 8Cumulative release of Cu2+ from Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L, Cu−MMT, and CuSO4.5H2O.