| Literature DB >> 33800811 |
Brian D Henderson1, David J Kinahan2,3,4,5, Jeanne Rio1, Rohit Mishra6, Damien King6, Sarai M Torres-Delgado7, Dario Mager7, Jan G Korvink7, Jens Ducrée1.
Abstract
Within microfluidic technologies, the centrifugal microfluidic "Lab-on-a-Disc" (LoaD) platform offers great potential for use at the PoC and in low-resource settings due to its robustness and the ability to port and miniaturize 'wet bench' laboratory protocols. We present the combination of 'event-triggered dissolvable film valves' with a centrifugo-pneumatic siphon structure to enable control and timing, through changes in disc spin-speed, of the release and incubations of eight samples/reagents/wash buffers. Based on these microfluidic techniques, we integrated and automated a chemiluminescent immunoassay for detection of the CVD risk factor marker C-reactive protein displaying a limit of detection (LOD) of 44.87 ng mL-1 and limit of quantitation (LoQ) of 135.87 ng mL-1.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; centrifugal microfluidics; chemiluminescence; immunoassay; lab-on-a-chip; lab-on-a-disc; siphon valves
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33800811 PMCID: PMC8000095 DOI: 10.3390/bios11030073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Comparison of common lab-on-a-disc valving technologies.
| Name and Operation | Advantages | Disadvantages | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple operation and ease of manufacture. | Cannot operate at high disc speeds. Highly dependent on manufacturing fidelity. Low number of assay steps. | [ | |
| Simple operation and ease of manufacture. Can enable sample incubation. | Highly dependent on manufacturing fidelity. Low number of assay steps. Can use significant disc real-estate. | [ | |
| Simple operation and ease of manufacture. Can enable sample incubation. Reliable and tolerant to low-fidelity manufacture. | Can use up significant disc real-estate. | [ | |
| Highly reliable. No external instrumentation required—rotational control only. | Can require a powerful motor to generate necessary acceleration (Euler Force). Can use significant disc real-estate. | [ | |
| Highly reliable. No external instrumentation required–rotational control only. Timing of valve actuations. | Requires additional components (integration of foils or stick-packs etc.) Complex assays limited by available motor speeds. Single use valves. Difficult to implement long incubations. | [ | |
| Highly reliable. No external instrumentation required–rotational control only. Timing of valve actuations. | Requires multilayer architecture. Requires embedded DF valves. Complex assays limited by available motor speeds. Single use valves. Difficult to implement long incubations. | [ | |
| Sequential Valve Opening. | Operates only at low to medium disc speeds. Can take significant disc space. No timing of valve release. No long incubations/washes. | [ | |
| Permits complex multi-step assays (20+ steps). Suitable for high disc spin-speeds. | Requires multilayer architecture. Requires embedded DF valves. No timing of valve release. No long incubations/washes. Single use valves. | [ | |
| Permits complex multi-step assays (60+ steps). Suitable for high disc spin-speeds. Feedback control possible. | Requires multilayer architecture. Requires embedded DF valves. No long incubations/washes. Single use valves. Requires support instrumentation, | [ | |
| Permits complex multi-step assays. Suitable for high disc spin-speeds. Timing of valve opening/incubations using only rotational control. | Requires multilayer architecture. Requires embedded DF valves. Single use valves (except siphon). | - |
Figure 1Event-triggered sequential release of centrifugo-pneumatic siphon valves (CPSVs). (a,b) Loading of sample (green), at a high spin rate, into the incubation chamber. Alternating the spin rate can be used to induce mixing in the incubation chamber. (c) At a low spin rate, the centrifugo-pneumatic siphon valve is primed and (d) then emptied at a medium spin rate. (e) The control film (CF) of the following valve is wetted to vent the pneumatic channel release to the next reagent (blue). This process can be repeated to control the timed release and incubation of further reagents.
Figure 2Multilayer assembly of the chip. The PSA tab covers a sample removal hole in the vent layer during disc operation. The magnets are held in place by an interference fit and hold the paramagnetic beads in place within the disc.
Figure 3Disc architecture. Reservoir 1 (R1) contains magnetic beads in buffer, which are held inside the reaction chamber. These beads have been prepared off-chip with the capture antibody. R2 contains the sample, R3 and R4 are filled with washing buffers, R5 contains the detection antibody, R6 and R7 contain wash buffers, and R8 contains the substrate to catalyze chemiluminescent detection. Note, for data presented in Figure 6, R8 was left empty and, following the final washing step (R7), the disc was stopped. The magnets were removed, and the beads were suspended in buffer and aspirated into a pipette through a vent on the incubation chamber. Off-disc measurement was made via GloMax 96 Microplate Luminometer according to the protocol described in ESI.
Figure 4(a) Chemiluminescent immunoassay protocol with incubation times. (b) Typical spin protocol describing the first three LUOs automated on the disc. Note that the protocol was fully automated using a programmable, human-readable macro integrated with the centrifugal test stand using LabVIEW.
Figure 5Images acquired using stroboscopic test stand with dyed water representing reagents. (a) Magnetic beads are loaded into the chamber and secured via magnetic force in the incubation chamber. (b) Red dye solution, mimicking the sample, is released through a DF valve into the incubation chamber. (c) The ‘sample’ is transferred to the waste chamber where wetting the next DF releases the first wash buffer.
Figure 6(a) Benchmark (on-bench) magnetic chemiluminescence assay showing the standard 180-minute protocol (orange) and the optimized/accelerated 40-minute assay (blue). (b) Measurements (arbitrary units) from the on-disc CRP assay (n = 3 at each data point). As described in Materials and Methods, all incubation and washing steps took place on-disc, except detection (addition of HRP). Beads were pipetted from the disc and chemiluminescence to a benchtop reader (GloMax 96 Microplate Luminometer).
Reagent loading sequence. Each reservoir was loaded with 90 μL of reagent.
| Assay Step | Reagent | Incubation Time (mins) | Mixing Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bead Capture (1) | 0.5 mg Pre-blocked magnetic beads in Incubation Buffer | 2.5 | 15 |
| CRP Incubation (2) | C-Reactive protein Standard/Sample suspended in Incubation Buffer | 20 | 120 |
| Wash 1 (3) | Wash Solution | 2.5 | 15 |
| Wash 2 (4) | Wash Solution | 2.5 | 15 |
| Detection Antibody (5) | 1:10,000 dilution in Incubation Buffer | 20 | 120 |
| Wash 3 (6) | Wash Solution | 2.5 | 15 |
| Wash 4 (7) | Wash Solution | 2.5 | 15 |
| Chemiluminescent Substrate (8) | N/A | N/A | N/A |