Literature DB >> 33799823

Evaluation of the FitBark Activity Monitor for Measuring Physical Activity in Dogs.

Jessica Colpoys1, Dean DeCock2.   

Abstract

Accelerometers track changes in physical activity which can indicate health and welfare concerns in dogs. The FitBark 2 (FitBark) is an accelerometer for use with dogs; however, no studies have externally validated this tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate FitBark criterion validity by correlating FitBark activity data to dog step count. Dogs (n = 26) were fitted with a collar-mounted FitBark and individually recorded for 30 min using a three-phase approach: (1) off-leash room explore; (2) human-dog interaction; and (3) on-leash walk. Video analysis was used to count the number of times the front right paw touched the ground (step count). Dog step count and FitBark activity were moderately correlated across all phases (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). High correlations between step count and FitBark activity were observed during phases 1 (r = 0.795, p < 0.001) and 2 (r = 0.758, p < 0.001), and a low correlation was observed during phase 3 (r = 0.498, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the FitBark is a valid tool for tracking physical activity in off-leash dogs; however, more work should be done to identify the best method of tracking on-leash activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FitBark; accelerometer; activity monitor; animal behavior; animal welfare; canine; dog; pet; validation; wearable technology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33799823      PMCID: PMC7999242          DOI: 10.3390/ani11030781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  22 in total

1.  The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities.

Authors:  P M Grant; C G Ryan; W W Tigbe; M H Granat
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Evaluation of agreement between numerical rating scales, visual analogue scoring scales, and force plate gait analysis in dogs.

Authors:  Margaret M Quinn; Nicholas S Keuler; Yan Lu; Maria L E Faria; Peter Muir; Mark D Markel
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.495

3.  The Effect of Dogs on Human Sleep in the Home Sleep Environment.

Authors:  Salma I Patel; Bernie W Miller; Heidi E Kosiorek; James M Parish; Philip J Lyng; Lois E Krahn
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Dose reduction of meloxicam in dogs with osteoarthritis-associated pain and impaired mobility.

Authors:  B G J Wernham; B Trumpatori; J Hash; J Lipsett; G Davidson; P Wackerow; A Thomson; B D X Lascelles
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Evaluation of an accelerometer for at-home monitoring of spontaneous activity in dogs.

Authors:  Bernard D Hansen; B Duncan X Lascelles; Bruce W Keene; Allison K Adams; Andrea E Thomson
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs.

Authors:  William T N Culp; Philipp D Mayhew; Dorothy C Brown
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.495

7.  Evaluation of optimal sampling interval for activity monitoring in companion dogs.

Authors:  Caitlin Dow; Kathryn E Michel; Molly Love; Dorothy Cimino Brown
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Evaluation of a novel canine activity monitor for at-home physical activity analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan M Yashari; Colleen G Duncan; Felix M Duerr
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Using an electronic activity monitor system as an intervention modality: A systematic review.

Authors:  Zakkoyya H Lewis; Elizabeth J Lyons; Jessica M Jarvis; Jacques Baillargeon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Evaluation of construct and criterion validity for the 'Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs' (LOAD) clinical metrology instrument and comparison to two other instruments.

Authors:  Myles Benjamin Walton; Emily Cowderoy; Duncan Lascelles; John F Innes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.