| Literature DB >> 33799658 |
Gnkambo Agwa Gora1,2, Muhammad Farooq Umer2,3, Peter Obang Ojulu4, Sintayehu Tsegaye Betaw5, Akwoma Okugn Cham6, Ojulu Agwa Gora7, Xin Qi2,8.
Abstract
The decades-long global efforts to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality have shown overall progress, but most developing countries are still lagging significantly. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of non-institutional childbirths in the Gambella State and to identify socio-demographic factors responsible for non-institutional utilization of available birth services by reproductive-aged mothers. A community-based cross-sectional study design was adopted using a multi-stage random sampling technique. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the selected place of birth. EpiData version 3.1 and SPSS version 13.0 were applied for data entry and analyses. All the 657 eligible mothers recruited for this study responded to the interview. 71% of the total respondents had non-institutional childbirths (NICB), and the rest had their most recent childbirth in an institution with skilled healthcare providers' assistance. Socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with NICB. Nuer (AOR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.23-3.63) and Majang ethnic (AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.02-3.83) groups had higher rates of NICB than the rest of the study population. The prevalence of non-institutional childbirths in Gambella remained two times higher than the institutional childbirths.Entities:
Keywords: Gambella Regional State; institutional birth; non-institutional childbirth; socio-demographic factors
Year: 2021 PMID: 33799658 PMCID: PMC8001352 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18062859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Women’s characteristics and association with institutional and non-institutional childbirths.
| Variable | All Respondents | Non-Healthcare Institutional Birth | Healthcare Institutional Birth |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percent | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | |||
| Age groups | ||||||||
| 15–29 | 258 | 39.0 | 178 | 69.0 | 80 | 31.0 | 1.241 | 0.538 |
| 30–40 | 275 | 41.9 | 198 | 72.0 | 77 | 28.0 | ||
| 40–49 | 124 | 18.9 | 92 | 74.2 | 32 | 25.8 | ||
| Marital Status | ||||||||
| Married | 531 | 80.8 | 365 | 68.7 | 166 | 31.3 | 8.409 | 0.015 |
| Single | 60 | 9.0 | 49 | 81.7 | 11 | 18.3 | ||
| Others * | 66 | 10.0 | 54 | 81.8 | 12 | 18.2 | ||
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Housewife | 387 | 58.9 | 287 | 74.2 | 100 | 25.8 | 13.373 | 0.004 |
| Employee | 93 | 14.2 | 52 | 55.9 | 41 | 44.1 | ||
| Merchant | 42 | 6.4 | 33 | 78.6 | 9 | 21.4 | ||
| Others ** | 135 | 20.5 | 96 | 71.1 | 39 | 28.9 | ||
| Educational status | ||||||||
| No formal education | 176 | 26.8 | 139 | 79 | 37 | 21.0 | 14.306 | 0.006 |
| Grade 1–4 | 74 | 11.3 | 56 | 75.7 | 18 | 24.3 | ||
| Grade 5–8 | 154 | 23.4 | 108 | 70.1 | 46 | 29.9 | ||
| Grade 9–12 | 166 | 25.3 | 115 | 69.3 | 51 | 30.7 | ||
| Diploma and above | 87 | 57.5 | 50 | 57.5 | 37 | 42.5 | ||
| Religion | ||||||||
| Christian | 621 | 94.5 | 444 | 71.5 | 177 | 28.5 | 0.453 | 0.797 |
| Muslim | 13 | 2.0 | 9 | 69.2 | 4 | 30.8 | ||
| Others *** | 23 | 3.5 | 15 | 65.2 | 8 | 34.8 | ||
| Monthly income | ||||||||
| Below 1000 ETB | 426 | 64.8 | 314 | 73.7 | 112 | 26.3 | 5.348 | 0.148 |
| 1001–3000 ETB | 155 | 23.6 | 105 | 67.7 | 50 | 32.3 | ||
| 3001–6000 ETB | 64 | 9.7 | 43 | 67.2 | 21 | 32.8 | ||
| 6001 ETB and above | 12 | 1.8 | 6 | 50.0 | 6 | 50.0 | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||||||
| Anywaa | 235 | 35.8 | 156 | 66.4 | 79 | 33.6 | 16.795 | 0.005 |
| Nuer | 226 | 34.4 | 178 | 78.8 | 48 | 21.2 | ||
| Majang | 87 | 13.2 | 67 | 77.0 | 20 | 23.0 | ||
| Komo | 8 | 1.2 | 6 | 75.0 | 2 | 25.0 | ||
| Opuo | 10 | 1.5 | 5 | 50.0 | 5 | 50.0 | ||
| Others **** | 91 | 13.9 | 56 | 61.5 | 35 | 38.5 | ||
Abbreviation: ETB, Ethiopian Birr (currency). * Others marital status: Divorced, widowed, never married, illegal partner. ** Others Occupation: Famer, Daily laborer, upon. *** Others Religion: Those who have no religion to believed and traditional believers. **** Others Ethnicity: All ethnic groups from another part of the country.
Figure 1Respondents educational status by age groups.
Figure 2Respondents’ reasons for their non-institutional childbirths.
Plan for the place of birth service utilization.
| Variable | Place of Birth |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional Birth | Non-institutional Birth | |||||
| Number | Percent | Number | Percent | |||
| Plan for the place of delivery | ||||||
| Yes | 160 | 41 | 230 | 59 | 70.375 | 0.006 |
| No | 29 | 10.9 | 238 | 89.1 | ||
| For yes where to delivery | ||||||
| Non-institutional birth | 1 | 1.7 | 57 | 98.3 | 43.496 | <0.001 |
| Institutional birth | 159 | 47.9 | 173 | 52.1 | ||
Socio-demographic factors associated with institutional and non-institutional childbirths.
| Variable | Place of Birth | OR (95 % CI) | AOR (95 % CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Institutional Birth | Institutional Birth | |||||
| Age groups | ||||||
| 15–29 | 178 (69.0%) | 80 (31.0%) | 0.77 (0.47–1.25) | 0.296 | ||
| 30–40 | 198 (72.0%) | 77 (28.0%) | 0.89 (0.55–1.44) | 0.649 | ||
| 40–49 | 92 (74.2%) | 32 (25.8%) | 1 | |||
| Marital Status | ||||||
| Married | 365 (68.7%) | 166 (31.3%) | 0.49 (0.25–0.93) | 0.031 | 0.36 (0.17–0.74) | 0.006 |
| Single | 49 (81.7%) | 11 (18.3%) | 0.99 (0.40–2.44) | 0.982 | 1.36 (0.53–3.47) | 0.524 |
| Others * | 54 (81.8%) | 12(18.2%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Occupation | ||||||
| Housewife | 287 (74.2%) | 100 (25.8%) | 0.47 (0.69–0.91) | 0.039 | 1.87 (1.14–3.05) | 0.012 |
| Employee | 52 (55.9%) | 41 (44.1%) | 0.52 (0.29–0.89) | 0.019 | 0.57 (0.31–0.82) | 0.029 |
| Merchant | 33 (78.6%) | 9 (21.4%) | 1.49 (0.65–3.40) | 0.344 | 1.44 (0.61–3.37) | 0.397 |
| Others ** | 96 (71.1%) | 39 (28.9%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Educational status | ||||||
| No formal education | 139 (79.0%) | 37 (21.0%) | 2.78 (1.59–4.86) | <0.01 | 2.49 (1.40–4.41) | 0.002 |
| Grade 1–4 | 56 (75.7%) | 18 (24.3%) | 2.30 (1.16–4.54) | 0.016 | 2.15 (1.08–4.27) | 0.029 |
| Grade 5–8 | 108 (70.1%) | 46 (29.9%) | 1.74 (1.00–3.00) | 0.048 | 1.77 (1.01–3.08) | 0.045 |
| Grade 9–12 | 115 (69.3%) | 51 (30.7%) | 1.67 (0.97–2.85) | 0.062 | 1.74 (1.00–3.01) | 0.049 |
| Diploma and above | 50 (57.5%) | 37 (42.5%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Religion | ||||||
| Christian | 444 (71.5%) | 177 (28.5%) | 1.34 (0.55–3.21) | 0.515 | ||
| Muslim | 9 (69.2%) | 4 (30.8%) | 1.20 (0.27–5.15) | 0.806 | ||
| Others *** | 15 (65.2%) | 8 (34.8%) | 1 | |||
| Monthly income | ||||||
| Below 1000 ETB | 314 (73.7%) | 112 (26.3%) | 2.80 (0.88–8.87) | 0.079 | ||
| 1001–3000 ETB | 105 (67.7%) | 50 (32.3%) | 2.10 (0.64–6.83) | 0.218 | ||
| 3001–6000 ETB | 43 (67.2%) | 21 (32.8%) | 2.05 (0.58–7.11) | 0.26 | ||
| 6001 ETB and above | 6 (50.0%) | 6 (50.0%) | 1 | |||
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| Anywaa | 156 (66.4%) | 79 (33.6%) | 1.23 (0.74–2.03) | 0.411 | 1.24 (0.74–2.07) | 0.408 |
| Nuer | 178 (78.8%) | 48 (21.2%) | 2.32 (1.36–3.93) | 0.002 | 2.12 (1.23–3.63) | 0.006 |
| Majang | 67 (77.0%) | 20 (23.0%) | 2.09 (1.08–4.02) | 0.027 | 1.98 (1.02–3.83) | 0.043 |
| Komo | 6 (75.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | 1.88 (0.35–9.81) | 0.457 | 1.49 (0.28–7.95) | 0.636 |
| Opuo | 5 (50.0%) | 5 (50.0%) | 0.63 (0.16–2.31) | 0.482 | 0.57 (0.15–2.14) | 0.404 |
| Others **** | 56 (61.5%) | 35 (38.5%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Abbreviation: ETB, Ethiopian Birr. ** Others marital status: Divorced, widowed, never married, illegal partner. ** Others Occupation: Famer, daily laborer, upon. *** Others Religion: Those who have no religion to believed and traditional believers. **** Others Ethnicity: All ethnic groups from another part of the country.