Literature DB >> 33270777

Utilization of institutional delivery and associated factors among mothers in Hosanna Town, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study.

Demeke Anshebo1, Bifitu Geda2, Aregash Mecha3, Alemu Liru1, Ritbano Ahmed4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Institutional delivery is one of the key interventions that have been proven to reduce maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality. Ethiopia has initiated different efforts to enhance the acceptance of institutional delivery. In spite of this, the number of institutional deliverys is still very low in Ethiopia and varies from region to region. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the utilization of institutional delivery and of factors associated with it among mothers in Hossana Town, Southern Ethiopia.
METHODS: This study was a community-based cross-sectional study of mothers who had given birth within 12 months before the study. Data were collected using a pretested questionnaire. During the study period, 403 mothers were selected using the systematic random sampling technique. Data entry was done using EpiData (version 3.1), and data were exported to SPSS (version 24) for analysis. Both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the associated factors at 95% CI.
RESULTS: This study revealed that 53.6% of mothers delivered their infants at health facilities. The factors associated with the institutional delivery were primigravidas (AOR = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4-4.7), the availability of antenatal care (AOR = 3.4; 95%CI, 1.7-7.2), having planned pregnancies (AOR = 3.9; 95%CI, 1.7-9.3) and the involvement of both parents in decision making (AOR = 2.4; 95%CI, 1.4-2.5). However, when only the mother was involved in the decision making regarding the delivery, the figure decreased by 70% (AOR = 0.3; 95%CI, 0.1-0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that high numbers of births occur without skilled attendants or are non- institutional delivery. In terms of the factors that are associated with institutional delivery, the study suggests that strengthening sustained provision of education during antenatal care and at community levels are crucial.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33270777      PMCID: PMC7714344          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Throughout the world, roughly three-quarters of all maternal deaths take place during delivery and in the immediate postpartum period [1]. In 2017, approximately 295,000 women died during and directly following pregnancy and childbirth due to inadequate or non-existent care, and 94% of these deaths occurred in the low-resource countries [2]. Ethiopia has significantly reduced its maternal mortality from the 1990s estimate to an average annual reduction rate of 5% or more [3]. However, the levels of maternal mortality in Ethiopia are among the highest in the world. According to the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survery (EDHS), 422 women died as a result of complications during pregnancy or childbirth [4]. Most maternal deaths are preventable, as the healthcare solutions to prevent or manage complications are well known [2, 5, 6]. Ensuring that every delivery is attended by a skilled provider is one of the crucial strategies for reducing maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality [6-9]. Institutional delivery refers to childbirth that takes place at medical facilities that are equipped with technology and also under the supervision of skilled birth attendants. It is one of the key interventions that have been proven to reduce maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality [8, 10]. Various medical tools and technologies are used in institutional deliverys to ascertain that the health of the neonates or mothers is not compromised [8, 10]. Delivery in such health facilities has numerous benefits, including increased access to the following: appropriate equipment and supplies that are available on site or through immediate referral to a higher level facility, trained healthcare professionals who provide specific care and attention to newborn babies with special needs to improve their chances of survival and to mothers to reduce the risk of maternal mortality, support for women seeking assistance for delivery at the right time without delaying childbearing, quality care and delivery in an environment that is prepared for emergencies, personnel and equipment to handle emergency circumstances that necessitate immediate medical attention, aid to hasten labour, such as intravenous drips and intramuscular injections during labour, monitoring labour for safe delivery, active management of the third stage of delivery, immediate attention to the newborn, postpartum monitoring and addressing any post-delivery complications in the mother and infant [7, 8, 10]. Global attention to skilled birth attendance has increased remarkably in recent years, although wide gaps in coverage persist across countries [7, 11]. In 2019, 81% of births worldwide were assisted by skilled birth attendants. However, institutional delivery varies from region to region, with figures of 99% in Western Europe, 98% in Eastern and Central Europe, 91% in East Asia and the Pacific, 94% in Latin America and the Caribbean, 94.6% in America and the Caribbean [7] and 57% in Sub-Saharan Africa [7, 11]. Findings from multiple studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia in the last ten years revealed that the prevalence of institutional delivery is within the range of 12.3% to 78.8% [12, 13]. A number of previous studies have attempted to identify factors associated with institutional delivery in different countries. However, these factors are not the same across different socioeconomic statuses within a society. The socioeconomic factors that have been identified include the following: living in urban settings [12, 14–21], having maternal ages of under 20 [12] and the ages of the mothers being 15 to 24 [22, 23], having high levels of maternal education [15–17, 19–22, 24–32], having high wealth indexes [33, 34], being under 20 years at first marriages and being 20 to 24 years old [13] and having high levels of paternal education [28, 29]. Obstetric factors are as follows: having antenatal care visits during pregnancy [12, 13, 21, 23–26, 35, 36], being primigravida [12, 14, 21, 34, 36, 37], having complications during pregnancy [15,16], having histories of previous institutional delivery [18, 26], having planned pregnancies [37], mothers having adequate knowledge about the danger signs of pregnancy [21, 22] and having birth preparedness plans during pregnancy [17]. Other factors that facilitate the use of institutional delivery include the following: female-headed households [31], women who had made joint decisions with their husbands regarding the place of delivery [31, 37–39], living close to health facilities [36, 39], and staying at a maternity waiting home before delivery [35]. The Government of Ethiopia has developed different strategies to increase the use of institutional deliverys; these include community mobilization by the Health Development Army, service promotion by health extension workers, expansion of health facilities, increasing the availability of supplies and deploying appropriately skilled health professionals. In addition, a number of interventions were implemented to create free home delivery in kebeles [40]. In spite of this, however, the number of institutional delivery is still very low (26%) in Ethiopia. This rate varies across geographic areas, ranging from 97% in Addis Ababa to 15% in Afar [4]. Based on the evidence to date, the findings of multiple studies conducted in the different parts of Ethiopia on similar topics indicate inconsistent coverage, and the various factors [12-20]. Clearly, then, examining the frequencies of institutional delivery and the factors that deter mothers from seeking institutional delivery in specific areas is essential for designing suitable interventions to increase institutional delivery. Therefore, this study attempted to assess the utilisation of institutional delivery and of factors associated with it among mothers in Hossana Town, Southern Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

This community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from July 1 to 30, 2019 in Hossana Town, Ethiopia. The town is 194 km and 232 km away from Addis Ababa and Hawassa, respectively. The total reproductive age group was 25, 709, and estimated pregnancy was 3,820, which constituted 3.5% of the population. The total reproductive age group were 25, 709, and estimated pregnancy was 3820 in the town which constituted 3.5% of the population. According to the annual report of the town’s health office, the physical health services coverage was estimated to be 100%. The town has one hospital, three health centres and eight urban health extension workers offices, which are all government run. It also has 1 hospital, 35 pharmacies, 22 primary clinics, 19 medium clinics, 2 dental clinics and 2 eye clinics, all of which are private-owned facility [41]. The source population consisted of all mothers who had given birth in Hossana Town within 12 months prior to the study period, and the study population consisted of sampled mothers from this group. Mothers who have lived in the town for at least six months were included, and mothers who were critically ill or cannot able to communicate were excluded. A sample size of 415 was calculated using a single population proportion formula with the following assumptions, drawn from a study conducted in Wolega: 57% proportion of institutional delivery [24], 95% confidence interval (CI), 5% margin of error and 10% allowance for non-response rate. Systematic sampling was employed, and all kebeles in Hosana Town were included. Before the actual data collection, information on mothers who had given birth within the previous 12 months were compiled from family folders and delivery registration books from each health post in all kebeles to create a sampling frame. Each household was successively given a corresponding house number according to the sampling frame and k-value calculated. If a household had more than one mother with a history of birth in the last 12 months, one of the women was selected using a lottery method. Probability proportional to size allocation was used to allocate study participants in each kebele. Finally, one mother who had given birth in the last 12 months was selected from every sixth household. For data collection, a pre-tested interviewers administered a questionnaire adapted from instruments used in related studies [12, 13, 15–20, 39, 42, 43] as well as Ethiopian demographic and health survey data [4]. The questionnaire was primarily focused on socio-demographiccharacteristics, obstetric history and participant knowledge related to danger signs during pregnancy and childbirth. A total of 10 midwives, eight with diplomas and two with bachelor’s degrees, who were fluent in the local language were hired for data collection and supervision. The quality of data was maintained throughout the study. Before data collection began, the questionnaire was translated into Amharic and Hadiyisa and back-translated into English to see the consistency. Additionally, both data collectors and supervisors attended two days of training regarding the study’s objectives, data collection procedures and interview protocol. The questionnaire was also pretested on 5% (21) of the sample size using participants selected from the Fonko town. The completeness, consistency and applicability of the questionnaire were confirmed accordingly. A reliability test, with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.72, was conducted on knowledge items related to danger signs of pregnancy and childbirth. During data collection, mothers who were not available upon the data collector’s first visit to their household were revisited two or more times, when necessary, with 2–3 days between visits. Additionally, the investigators and supervisor reviewed filled questionnaires for completeness and consistency of information on a daily basis. Furthermore, prior to analysis, all data were carefully entered and cleaned.

Measurements

Institutional delivery utilization

Giving birth to a child in a health facility under the overall supervision of trained and competent health personnel was classified as: “yes” (mother who gave birth in health facility) or“no”.

Knowledge about danger signs during pregnancy and child birth

In this study, danger signs during child birth were assessed using 11 items, with a correct answer was given a score of “1”, and an incorrect answer was given a score of “0”. This questionnaire is scored by calculating the percentage of the total score and categorizing it correspondingly as adequate and inadequate knowledge. Inadequate knowledge related to mothers who scored less than 75% of the total score of the knowledge questions, while adequate knowledge related to mothers who scored greater than or equal to 75% of the knowledge questions correctly [22, 23].

Data analysis

Data were checked and entered into EpiData software (version 3.1) before being exported to SPSS (version 24) for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify candidates for multivariate logistic regression analysis. The strength and direction of association between dependent and independent variables were expressed in odds ratio with a 95% CI. To identify independent factors, all independent variables with a p-value of ≤ 0.25 in bivariate logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was determined using a 95% CI with a p-value of < 0.05. A Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to check that the necessary assumptions for multivariable logistic regressions were fulfilled.

Ethics approval and consent to participation

Ethical approval was granted by the Research Ethical Review Board of Wachemo University, College of Health Sciences. Moreover, a permission letters were obtained from the Hadiya Zonal Health Department and Hosanna Town health office before data collection began. Finally, written informed consent was obtained from each participant included in the study after its objectives were explained to them. For study participants fewer than 18 years of age, informed consent was obtained from their parent or guardian. Participants were accordingly informed about the purposes, procedures, potential risks and benefits of the study. Confidentiality was maintained throughout the study by excluding personal identifiers, such as names and addresses.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

A total of 403 mothers were interviewed for this study, wherein the response rate was 97.1%. Approximately 83% of the mothers were aged between 20 and 34 years. The majority of the mothers, i.e. 388 (96.3%) were married, 246 (61%) were Hadiya ethnics, 231 (57.3%) were Protestants, and 243 (60.3%) were housewives. In terms of education only 148 (36.7%) had completed secondary or higher education. Other socio-demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Socio–demographic characteristics of mothers who had given birth in the last 12 months in Hasana Town, November 2019.

VariablesFrequency (N = 403)Percent
Age group
20–3433482.9
35 and above6917.1
Ethnicity
Hadiya24661.0
Kambata6816.9
Amhara358.7
Silte317.7
Gurage235.7
Religion
Protestant23157.3
Orthodox10024.8
Catholic409.9
Muslims327.5
Marital status
Married38896.3
Others*153.7
Education status of women
Cannot read & write7518.6
Can read and write12430.8
Primary11428.3
Secondary & above9022.3
Education status of husband
Cannot read & write5914.6
Can read and write8320.6
Primary11328.0
Secondary & above14836.7
Mothers’ occupation
Housewives24360.3
civil servants7919.6
Merchants8120.1
Husband occupation
Merchants14836.7
Civil servants14034.7
Daily laborers9323.1
Farmers225.5
Decision maker at home
Husbands18245.2
Self4210.4
Both17944.4

*other include sincle, divorced and widowed

*other include sincle, divorced and widowed

Obstetric characteristics and prevalence of institutional delivery

Of the 403 study participants, 352 (87.3%) were multigravida. The majority of the mothers, 316 in total (78.4%), had attended antenatal care follow up. Overall, 216 (53%) mothers had delivered their last child at a health facility. Regarding respondents’ knowledge related to danger signs during pregnancy and child birth, 158 (41.1%) had adequate knowledge. The results for other items related to obstetrics and participant knowledge are indicated in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2

Obstetric characteristics of mothers of mother who had given birth in the last 12 months in Hasana Town, November 2019.

VariablesFrequencyPercent
Gravidity(N = 403)
Primi5112.7
Multi35287.3
History of institutional delivery(N = 352)
No9827.8
Yes25472.2
Ever had abortion((N = 352)
No26174.1
Yes9125.9
ANC follow up((N = 403)
No8721.6
Yes31678.4
Number of ANC visits((N = 316)
< 4 visi20564.9
≥4 visits11135.1
Status of last pregnancy (N = 403)
Unplanned11729.0
Planned28671.0
Institutional delivery (N = 403)
No18746.4
Yes21653.6
Reasons for non- institutional delivery(N = 187)
Lack of transport to health facility368.9
Long distance to health facility205.0
Sudden onset of labour4110.2
No respect of health care workers in 1st birth5012.4
Poor belief on institution409.9
Final decision about place of childbirth(N = 403)
Both22756.3
Husband10325.6
Respondent7318.1
Complications of pregnancy
No34986.6
Yes5814.4
Table 3

Knowledge on danger signs of mother who had given birth in the last 12 months in Hasana Town, November 2019.

No.ItemsYesNo
Frequency (%)Frequency (%)
1.Bleeding359(93.5)25(6.5)
2.Severe headache91(23.7)293(76.3)
3.Blurred vision76(19.8)308(80.2)
4.Swollen hands/face93(24.2)291(75.8)
5.High fever61(15.9)323(84.1)
6.Loss of consciousness102(26.6)282(73.4)
7.Difficulty of breathing51(13.3)333(86.7)
8.Severe weakness62(16.1)322(83.9)
9.Severe abdominal pain96(25.0)288(75.0)
10.Accelerated or reduced fetal movement210(54.7)174(45.3)
11.Water breaks283(73.7)101(26.3)

Factors associated with institutional delivery utilization

Under bivariate analysis, women who were mostly associated with an institutional delivery were aged between 20–34, had maternal education of secondary and above level, were primigravida, were not decision makers at home, had a planned pregnancy, and had an ANC during pregnancy. In multivariable logistic regression, women with these conditions were found to be significantly associated with institutional delivery. Primigravida mothers were more likely to give birth at a health institution (AOR = 3.9; 95% CI: 1.4, 4.7). When both parents were involved in determining the place of delivery, the probability of giving birth at a health institution was double or more (AOR = 2.4;95%CI, 1.4, 2.5) than when the decision made only by the husband. In contrast, when the decision was made only by the mother, the probability of institutional delivery was 70% less likely (AOR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.8) as compared to when both parents were involved in the decision making. In addition, planned pregnancy was increasingly found to be a factor in promoting institutional deliveries (AOR = 33.9, 95% CI: 1.7, 9.3). Furthermore, the likelihood of utilizing institutional delivery increased in mothers who had ANC visits (Table 4).
Table 4

Associated factors of institutional delivery mother who had given birth in the last 12 months in Hasana Town, November 2019.

VariablesInstitutional delivery(N = 403)COR(95%CI)AOR(95%CI)
NoYes
Age at last pregnancy
20–341391953.2(1.8, 5.6)1.5(0.8,3.0)
≥35(ref.)482111
Maternal education status
Cannot read & write (ref.)413411
Can read and write60641.3(.7,2.3)1.1(.6, 2.2)
Primary59551.1(.6,2.0)1.2(.6, 2.3)
Secondary & above27632.8(1.5,5.3)1.2(.6, 2.5)
Gravidity
Primi15362.3(1.2, 4.3)3.9(1.4, 4.7)**
Multi(ref.)17218011
Decision maker at home
Husbands(ref.)1037911
Self3750.2(.1, .5)0.3(.1, .8)*
Both471323.7(2.3, 5.7)2.4(1.4, 2.5)**
Status of last pregnancy
Unplanned(ref.)912611
Planned961906.9(4.2, 11.4)3.9(1.7, 9.3)**
ANC followers
No(ref.)731411
Yes1142029.2(5.0,17.1)3.4(1.7,7.2)**

Statically significant at **P< 0.01 and *P< 0.05

Statically significant at **P< 0.01 and *P< 0.05

Discussions

In this study, the prevalence of institutional delivery was found to be 53.6%, which is higher than that of other studies conducted in Arisi Zone, Dodota, Goba district, Cheha district, Banja, Gondor, Afar, and Wuro-Bunsa, Ethiopia, where utilisation was 12.3%, 18.2, 31%, 47%, 15.7%, 13.8%, and 14.4%, respectively[12, 15, 17, 18, 22–25]. The above-mentioned finding might be due to population differences, the duration of the study, cultural differences, the study setting, sample size or the sampling technique of the present study. In contrast, a lower occurrence of institutional delivery utilisation was observed in this study compared to that of other studies in Bahir-Dar, Woldia, Gambella, Holeta Town and Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia, which were 78.8%, 57%, 63%, 61.6%, and 60.5%, respectively [13, 24, 35, 37, 38]. This variation may be due to differences in the study setting, sociocultural backgrounds or to various interventions carried out in these study areas. According to the results of this study, the rate of institutional delivery utilisation is lower than in other countries such as Kenya, Zambia, Tanzania, and Ghana where it is reported to be 74%, 77%, 67.3%, and 93.3%% respectively[28, 36, 42, 43]. In contrast, the institutional delivery utilisation was higher than reported in Nepal (51.1%), Pakistan (41.2%), Nigeria (37%), and Eritrea (24.6%) [21, 32, 33, 39]. This finding might be due to the duration of the study, or social, economic or cultural differences. As revealed by the results of the present study, mothers who had ANC follow-up were reported to have a higher ratio of institutional delivery utilisation. This finding is also supported in studies conducted in Arisi Zone, Bahir-Dar, Nepal, Gondar, Afar, Gambella and Zambia, which reveal that those mothers who had ANC follow-up were more likely to utilise institutional delivery than those who did not have ANC follow-up[12, 13, 21, 23–25, 35, 36]. This might be due to ANC encouraging mothers to deliver at a health facility by providing information on the benefits of institutional delivery, the danger signs during labour, and developing plans to prepare for birth and birth complications. In addition, mothers who had ANC follow-up prepared financially and emotionally for the demands of pregnancy and childbirth. In this study, primigravida mothers were more likely to utilise institutional delivery, which is in line with what was found in Arisi Zone and Holeta Town(Ethiopia) [12, 37], Nepal [21], Zambia [34], Tanzania [42], and Ghana [43]. The possible explanation for this is that, as the parity increases, a woman’s confidence and experience may increase; as a result, the probability of giving birth at a health facility diminishes for women who have given birth two or more times. The present study also revealed that those mothers who had discussed the place of delivery with their husbands were more likely to utilise institutional delivery. This finding is similar to studies conducted in Holeta Town and Pawe (Ethiopia) [37, 38], Tanzania [31], and Eretria [39]. In contrast, where only mothers were involved in deciding on the place of delivery, institutional delivery decreased by 70%. A possible reason for this may be the low level of power mothers have in the household. According to this study, utilisation of institutional delivery was found to be associated with a planned pregnancy. This finding is similar to that of the study conducted in Ethiopia [36]. The possible reason for this finding might be due to the fact that mothers who plan to have a child might want to have a healthy pregnancy and its outcome and thus they might give a great attention for Institutional delivery. The strengths of this study include the fact that study participants were selected using the probability sampling method to ensure the representativeness of the study, and different approaches were used to maintain the quality of data. As a limitation, this study shares the limitations of a cross-sectional study. Also, this study was not supported by using a qualitative method, therefore, it was not possible to demonstrate detailed reasons from different perspectives for not utilising institutional delivery. Additionally, recall bias could not be ruled out regarding events that took place further from the period of data collection; furthermore, the social desirability bias might be a problem.

Conclusion

The findings of this study indicate that high numbers of births occur without skilled attendants or are non-institutional deliverys. The factors associated with the utilization of institutional delivery were primigravidas, the availability of antenatal care, having planned pregnancies and the involvement of both parents in decision making. However, when only the mother was involved in the decision making regarding the delivery, the institutional deliveries decreased by 70%. The research finding suggests that strengthening sustained provision of education about pregnancy and delivey during antenatal care and at community levels are crucial. Additionally, empowering women’s participation in the decision-making process within household is essential to inhance institutional delvey.

SPSS.

(SAV) Click here for additional data file.

Consent form and questionnaire.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  Trends in Health Facility Births in sub-Saharan Africa: An Analysis of Lessons Learned under the Millennium Development Goal Framework.

Authors:  Ifeyinwa E Udo; Henry V Doctor
Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health       Date:  2016-09

2.  Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kassebaum; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Megan S Coggeshall; Katya A Shackelford; Caitlyn Steiner; Kyle R Heuton; Diego Gonzalez-Medina; Ryan Barber; Chantal Huynh; Daniel Dicker; Tara Templin; Timothy M Wolock; Ayse Abbasoglu Ozgoren; Foad Abd-Allah; Semaw Ferede Abera; Ibrahim Abubakar; Tom Achoki; Ademola Adelekan; Zanfina Ademi; Arsène Kouablan Adou; José C Adsuar; Emilie E Agardh; Dickens Akena; Deena Alasfoor; Zewdie Aderaw Alemu; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Samia Alhabib; Raghib Ali; Mazin J Al Kahbouri; François Alla; Peter J Allen; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ubai Alsharif; Elena Alvarez; Nelson Alvis-Guzmán; Adansi A Amankwaa; Azmeraw T Amare; Hassan Amini; Walid Ammar; Carl A T Antonio; Palwasha Anwari; Johan Arnlöv; Valentina S Arsic Arsenijevic; Ali Artaman; Majed Masoud Asad; Rana J Asghar; Reza Assadi; Lydia S Atkins; Alaa Badawi; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Arindam Basu; Sanjay Basu; Justin Beardsley; Neeraj Bedi; Tolesa Bekele; Michelle L Bell; Eduardo Bernabe; Tariku J Beyene; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Jed D Blore; Berrak Bora Basara; Dipan Bose; Nicholas Breitborde; Rosario Cárdenas; Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela; Ruben Estanislao Castro; Ferrán Catalá-López; Alanur Cavlin; Jung-Chen Chang; Xuan Che; Costas A Christophi; Sumeet S Chugh; Massimo Cirillo; Samantha M Colquhoun; Leslie Trumbull Cooper; Cyrus Cooper; Iuri da Costa Leite; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Adrian Davis; Anand Dayama; Louisa Degenhardt; Diego De Leo; Borja del Pozo-Cruz; Kebede Deribe; Muluken Dessalegn; Gabrielle A deVeber; Samath D Dharmaratne; Uğur Dilmen; Eric L Ding; Rob E Dorrington; Tim R Driscoll; Sergei Petrovich Ermakov; Alireza Esteghamati; Emerito Jose A Faraon; Farshad Farzadfar; Manuela Mendonca Felicio; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Graça Maria Ferreira de Lima; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Elisabeth B França; Lynne Gaffikin; Ketevan Gambashidze; Fortuné Gbètoho Gankpé; Ana C Garcia; Johanna M Geleijnse; Katherine B Gibney; Maurice Giroud; Elizabeth L Glaser; Ketevan Goginashvili; Philimon Gona; Dinorah González-Castell; Atsushi Goto; Hebe N Gouda; Harish Chander Gugnani; Rahul Gupta; Rajeev Gupta; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Randah Ribhi Hamadeh; Mouhanad Hammami; Graeme J Hankey; Hilda L Harb; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon I Hay; Ileana B Heredia Pi; Hans W Hoek; H Dean Hosgood; Damian G Hoy; Abdullatif Husseini; Bulat T Idrisov; Kaire Innos; Manami Inoue; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Eiman Jahangir; Sun Ha Jee; Paul N Jensen; Vivekanand Jha; Guohong Jiang; Jost B Jonas; Knud Juel; Edmond Kato Kabagambe; Haidong Kan; Nadim E Karam; André Karch; Corine Kakizi Karema; Anil Kaul; Norito Kawakami; Konstantin Kazanjan; Dhruv S Kazi; Andrew H Kemp; Andre Pascal Kengne; Maia Kereselidze; Yousef Saleh Khader; Shams Eldin Ali Hassan Khalifa; Ejaz Ahmed Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Luke Knibbs; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Barthelemy Kuate Defo; Chanda Kulkarni; Veena S Kulkarni; G Anil Kumar; Kaushalendra Kumar; Ravi B Kumar; Gene Kwan; Taavi Lai; Ratilal Lalloo; Hilton Lam; Van C Lansingh; Anders Larsson; Jong-Tae Lee; James Leigh; Mall Leinsalu; Ricky Leung; Xiaohong Li; Yichong Li; Yongmei Li; Juan Liang; Xiaofeng Liang; Stephen S Lim; Hsien-Ho Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Shiwei Liu; Yang Liu; Belinda K Lloyd; Stephanie J London; Paulo A Lotufo; Jixiang Ma; Stefan Ma; Vasco Manuel Pedro Machado; Nana Kwaku Mainoo; Marek Majdan; Christopher Chabila Mapoma; Wagner Marcenes; Melvin Barrientos Marzan; Amanda J Mason-Jones; Man Mohan Mehndiratta; Fabiola Mejia-Rodriguez; Ziad A Memish; Walter Mendoza; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Ali H Mokdad; Glen Liddell Mola; Lorenzo Monasta; Jonathan de la Cruz Monis; Julio Cesar Montañez Hernandez; Ami R Moore; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Rintaro Mori; Ulrich O Mueller; Mitsuru Mukaigawara; Aliya Naheed; Kovin S Naidoo; Devina Nand; Vinay Nangia; Denis Nash; Chakib Nejjari; Robert G Nelson; Sudan Prasad Neupane; Charles R Newton; Marie Ng; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Muhammad Imran Nisar; Sandra Nolte; Ole F Norheim; Luke Nyakarahuka; In-Hwan Oh; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Bolajoko O Olusanya; Saad B Omer; John Nelson Opio; Orish Ebere Orisakwe; Jeyaraj D Pandian; Christina Papachristou; Jae-Hyun Park; Angel J Paternina Caicedo; Scott B Patten; Vinod K Paul; Boris Igor Pavlin; Neil Pearce; David M Pereira; Konrad Pesudovs; Max Petzold; Dan Poenaru; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; Dan Pope; Farshad Pourmalek; Dima Qato; D Alex Quistberg; Anwar Rafay; Kazem Rahimi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Sajjad ur Rahman; Murugesan Raju; Saleem M Rana; Amany Refaat; Luca Ronfani; Nobhojit Roy; Tania Georgina Sánchez Pimienta; Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Itamar S Santos; Monika Sawhney; Felix Sayinzoga; Ione J C Schneider; Austin Schumacher; David C Schwebel; Soraya Seedat; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Edson E Servan-Mori; Marina Shakh-Nazarova; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Kenji Shibuya; Hwashin Hyun Shin; Ivy Shiue; Inga Dora Sigfusdottir; Donald H Silberberg; Andrea P Silva; Jasvinder A Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Karen Sliwa; Sergey S Soshnikov; Luciano A Sposato; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Lela Sturua; Bryan L Sykes; Karen M Tabb; Roberto Tchio Talongwa; Feng Tan; Carolina Maria Teixeira; Eric Yeboah Tenkorang; Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi; Andrew L Thorne-Lyman; David L Tirschwell; Jeffrey A Towbin; Bach X Tran; Miltiadis Tsilimbaris; Uche S Uchendu; Kingsley N Ukwaja; Eduardo A Undurraga; Selen Begüm Uzun; Andrew J Vallely; Coen H van Gool; Tommi J Vasankari; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Salvador Villalpando; Francesco S Violante; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Theo Vos; Stephen Waller; Haidong Wang; Linhong Wang; XiaoRong Wang; Yanping Wang; Scott Weichenthal; Elisabete Weiderpass; Robert G Weintraub; Ronny Westerman; James D Wilkinson; Solomon Meseret Woldeyohannes; John Q Wong; Muluemebet Abera Wordofa; Gelin Xu; Yang C Yang; Yuichiro Yano; Gokalp Kadri Yentur; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Seok-Jun Yoon; Mustafa Z Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Kim Yun Jin; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Yong Zhao; Yingfeng Zheng; Maigeng Zhou; Jun Zhu; Xiao Nong Zou; Alan D Lopez; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher J L Murray; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Determinants of institutional delivery in rural Jhang, Pakistan.

Authors:  Sohail Agha; Thomas W Carton
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2011-07-30

4.  Prevalence and predictors of institutional delivery among pregnant mothers in Biharamulo district, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kihulya Mageda; Elia John Mmbaga
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-05-25

5.  Utilization of institutional delivery and associated factors among mothers in rural community of Pawe Woreda northwest Ethiopia, 2018.

Authors:  Tewodros Eshete; Mandefro Legesse; Mulatu Ayana
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2019-07-12

6.  Multilevel analysis of individual and community level factors associated with institutional delivery in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zeleke A Mekonnen; Wondwossen T Lerebo; Tesfay G Gebrehiwot; Samir A Abadura
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-08-26

7.  Factors associated with Institutional delivery service utilization among mothers in Bahir Dar City administration, Amhara region: a community based cross sectional study.

Authors:  Gedefaw Abeje; Muluken Azage; Tesfaye Setegn
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Why mothers still deliver at home: understanding factors associated with home deliveries and cultural practices in rural coastal Kenya, a cross-section study.

Authors:  Rodgers O Moindi; Moses M Ngari; Venny C S Nyambati; Charles Mbakaya
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Alemi Kebede; Kalkidan Hassen; Aderajew Nigussie Teklehaymanot
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-09-12

10.  Factors affecting home delivery among women living in remote areas of rural Zambia: a cross-sectional, mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Nancy A Scott; Elizabeth G Henry; Jeanette L Kaiser; Kaluba Mataka; Peter C Rockers; Rachel M Fong; Thandiwe Ngoma; Davidson H Hamer; Michelle L Munro-Kramer; Jody R Lori
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Non-Institutional Childbirths and the Associated Socio-Demographic Factors in Gambella Regional State, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Gnkambo Agwa Gora; Muhammad Farooq Umer; Peter Obang Ojulu; Sintayehu Tsegaye Betaw; Akwoma Okugn Cham; Ojulu Agwa Gora; Xin Qi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Effect of checklist based box system interventions on improving institutional delivery among reproductive age women in Northwest Ethiopia: generalized structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Netsanet Belete Andargie; Gurmesa Tura Debelew
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04

3.  Determinants and spatial distribution of institutional delivery in Ethiopia: evidence from Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Surveys 2019.

Authors:  Girma Gilano; Samuel Hailegebreal; Biniyam Tariku Seboka
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-02-21

4.  Anaemia, anthropometric undernutrition and associated factors among mothers with children younger than 2 years of age in the rural Dale district, southern Ethiopia: A community-based study.

Authors:  Tsigereda B Kebede; Selamawit Mengesha; Bernt Lindtjorn; Ingunn Marie S Engebretsen
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.660

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.