| Literature DB >> 33799636 |
Bernadetta Izydorczyk1, Ha Truong Thi Khanh2, Małgorzata Lipowska3, Katarzyna Sitnik-Warchulska1, Sebastian Lizińczyk1.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify psychological factors which are culture specific or common predictors for restrictive and bulimic behaviors towards eating for young women raised in different cultures. The study included 661 young women from Poland (n = 233) and Vietnam (n = 428). Subjects filled-in the Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI-3) and the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales (MBSRQ-AS), and body measurements were collected to calculate anthropometric indices. Women form Vietnam were less satisfied with their appearance than were their Polish peers, but Vietnamese showed a lower level of preoccupation with being overweight and fear of obesity. Intercultural differences indicate that Vietnamese women show greater intensities for psychological variables, connected with restrictive and bulimic eating behaviors, verified in the research model: low self-esteem, personal alienation, interpersonal insecurity, interpersonal alienation, emotional dysregulation, interoceptive deficits, perfectionism and asceticism, and anxiety.Entities:
Keywords: Westernization; body image; cross-cultural psychology; eating disorders; psychological factors for eating disorders
Year: 2021 PMID: 33799636 PMCID: PMC8001869 DOI: 10.3390/nu13030910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Theoretical model of the research variables (own elaboration).
Comparative analysis between groups of Vietnam (n = 428) and Polish (n = 233) women in terms of the variables included in the research model. Mann-Whitney U test.
| Research Variable | Polish Women | Vietnamese Women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Me | Me | U | Z |
| |
| Eating Disorders Questionnaire (EDI-3) | |||||
| Driver for thinnes | 10.00(5.00–17.00) | 10.00 | 79,513.0 | 0.34 | 0.730 |
| Bulimia | 3.00 | 6.00 | 56,919.5 | −7.13 | 0.001 |
| Body Dissatisfaction | 18.00 | 22.00 | 51,355.0 | −8.80 | 0.001 |
| Psychological factors | |||||
| Low Self-Esteem | 12.00 | 13.00 | 67,916.5 | −3.83 | 0.001 |
| Personal Alienation | 12.00 | 14.00 | 56,097.0 | −7.38 | 0.001 |
| Interpersonal Insecurity | 16.00 | 18.00 | 64,667.5 | −4.81 | 0.001 |
| Interpersonal Alienation | 12.50 | 12.00 | 76,013.0 | −1.40 | 0.162 |
| Interoceptive Deficits | 11.00 | 14.00 | 60,302.0 | −6.12 | 0.001 |
| EmotionalDysregulation | 8.00 | 13.00 | 48,208.0 | −9.75 | 0.001 |
| Perfectionism | 8.00 | 11.00 | 58,282.0 | −6.72 | 0.001 |
| Asceticism | 6.00 | 8.00 | 61,434.0 | −5.78 | 0.001 |
| Maturity Fears | 13.00 | 19.00 | 29,504.5 | −15.37 | 0.001 |
| Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ-AS) | |||||
| Apperance Evaluation | 3.14 | 3.00 | 47,362.0 | 4.12 | 0.001 |
| Apperance Orientation | 3.50 | 3.25 | 37,703.5 | 7.73 | 0.001 |
| Body Areas Satisfaction | 3.44 | 2.78 | 33,193.5 | 9.41 | 0.001 |
| Overweight Preoccupation | 2.50 | 2.00 | 49,239.5 | 3.41 | 0.001 |
| Self-Clasiffied Weigh | 3.00 | 3.00 | 48,466.5 | 3.70 | 0.001 |
U: Mann Whitney U test; Z: Z score; p: Significant level.
Figure 2Pathway model (SEM) of factors explaining the development of restrictive and compensatory eating behaviors in the group of young Polish women (n = 233). For chart readability, only the important paths are presented and the graphic markings of residues are omitted. (CHI = 1.95; p > 0.05; RMSEA = 0.060; CFI = 0.986;) * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 (significant for two-sided test). Appearance evaluation (Appeval); appearance orientation (Appor); body area satisfaction (BAS); overweight preoccupation (Owpreoc). CHI2 (chi square goodness of fit), RMSEA (Root mean square error of approximation), CFI: chi square goodness of fit, EDI: Eating Disorder Inventory.
Figure 3Pathway model, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of factors explaining the development of restrictive and compensatory eating behaviors in the group of young Vietnamese women (n = 428). For the readability of the chart, only the important paths are presented and the graphic markings of residues are omitted. (CHI = 1.56; p > 0.05; RMSEA = 0.037; CFI = 0.992;) * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 (significant for the two-sided test).
Summary of psychological risk factors (predictors of restrictive and bulimic behaviors) common and differentiating for the group of Polish and Vietnamese women.
| Explained Variables | Predictors | Predictors |
|---|---|---|
| Apperance evaluation | Low Self Esteem β = −0.483 *** | Personal Alienation β = −0.230 * |
| Apperance Orientation | Ascetism β = 0.154 * | Low Self Esteem β = −0.332 ** |
| Βody Areas Satisfaction | Low Self Esteem β = −0.147 * | Interpersonal Alienation β = 0.272 ** |
| Overweight Preoccupation | Ascetism β = 0.173 * | Interoceptive Deficit β = 0.280 ** |
| Restrictive Behaviours | Apperance Evaluation β = 0.068 *Body Areas Satisfaction β = −0.384 *** | Low Self Esteem β = 0.305 *** |
| Bulimic Behaviours | Apperance Evaluation β = 0.104 * | Appor β = −0.132 * |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.