| Literature DB >> 33799237 |
J William Allwood1, Pilar Martinez-Martin2, Yun Xu3, Alexander Cowan2, Simon Pont4, Irene Griffiths2, Julie Sungurtas4, Sarah Clarke5, Royston Goodacre3, Athole Marshall2, Derek Stewart6, Catherine Howarth2.
Abstract
Oats (Avena sativa L.) are a healthy food, being high in dietary fibre (e.g. β-glucans), antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins. Understanding the effect of variety and crop management on nutritional quality is important. The response of four oat varieties to increased nitrogen levels was investigated across multiple locations and years with respect to yield, grain quality and metabolites (assessed via GC- and LC- MS). A novel high-resolution UHPLC-PDA-MS/MS method was developed, providing improved metabolite enrichment, resolution, and identification. The combined phenotyping approach revealed that, amino acid levels were increased by nitrogen supplementation, as were total protein and nitrogen containing lipid levels, whereas health-beneficial avenanthramides were decreased. Although nitrogen addition significantly increased grain yield and β-glucan content, supporting increasing the total nitrogen levels recommended within agricultural guidelines, oat varietal choice as well as negative impacts upon health beneficial secondary metabolites and the environmental burdens associated with nitrogen fertilisation, require further consideration.Entities:
Keywords: Avenanthramides; Grain quality; Lipids; Metabolomics; Nitrogen; Oats (Avena sativa L.); Proteins and amino acids; β-glucan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33799237 PMCID: PMC8121753 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem ISSN: 0308-8146 Impact factor: 7.514
Fig. 1Response of mean (a) grain yield (t/ha at 15% moisture content) +/- standard error), (b) groat protein (% dry matter), (c) groat β-glucan (% dry matter) and (d) groat oil (% dry matter), to nitrogen application for four winter oat varieties at three field trials, IBERS 2014, ADAS 2014 and ADAS 2015. Nitrogen level 1: 0 kg N/ha applied; level 2: 50 kg N/ha applied (2014 trials) and 60 kg N/ha applied (2015 trial); level 3 100 kg N/ha applied (2014 trials) and 120 kg N/ha applied (2015 trial); level 4 150 kg N/ha applied (2014 trials) and 180 kg N/ha applied (2015 trial); level 5 200 kg N/ha applied (2014 trials) and 230 kg N/ha applied (2015 trial); level 6 250 kg N/ha applied ADAS 2014 and 280 kg N/ha applied ADAS 2015). Replication n3.
Mean values by variety and by nitrogen application level for grain yield (t/ha at 15% moisture content), lodging Index and yield component traits (panicle number per m2, grain number per m2 and grain number per panicle). Replication n3. Different letters indicate significant differences between mean values at p < 0.05 as calculated by Fisher’s least significance difference test. Nitrogen treatment and Variety p values (and their interaction) and the level of significance of these factors as calculated by two-way ANOVA. IB14: IBERS 2014 trial; AD14: ADAS 2014 trial; AD15: ADAS 2015 trial.
| Grain yield (t/ha)@ 85 % Dry Matter | Lodging Index | Thousand Grain Weight (g) | Grain no/m2 | Panicles/m2 | Grain no per panicle | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IB14 | AD14 | AD15 | IB14 | AD14 | AD15 | IB14 | AD14 | AD15 | IB14 | AD14 | AD15 | IB14 | AD14 | AD15 | IB14 | AD14 | AD15 | |
| Balado | 8.86 | 6.86 | 4.25b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.00 | 43.76c | 43.71c | 40.33c | 17129b | 13301b | 9006ab | 300.2a | 300.1a | 400.9a | 56.64d | 43.40d | 22.05c |
| Gerald | 8.70 | 6.26 | 3.06a | 9.40a | 8.33a | 0.00 | 38.94a | 36.12a | 32.69a | 18943c | 14867d | 8014ab | 392.0bc | 378.5b | 432.7a | 48.28c | 38.22c | 18.38ab |
| Mascani | 8.29 | 6.52 | 4.01b | 0.00b | 3.89ab | 0.00 | 45.85d | 45.52d | 42.49d | 15308a | 12117a | 7938ab | 399.8c | 415.2b | 502.7b | 37.98a | 28.55a | 15.45a |
| Tardis | 8.72 | 6.52 | 4.26b | 10.92a | 2.22b | 0.00 | 42.57b | 41.41b | 38.30b | 17564b | 13310c | 9628b | 363.2b | 406.3b | 482.5b | 47.82b | 32.14b | 19.57bc |
| 1 | 4.90a | 2.70a | 2.02a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00 | 41.49a | 41.10a | 38.29ab | 10095a | 5580a | 4487a | 251.8a | 278.6a | 321.9a | 40.40a | 20.52a | 13.92a |
| 2 | 8.05b | 5.26b | 2.99b | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00 | 44.11c | 41.92ab | 39.37b | 15603b | 10724bc | 6844b | 353.7b | 358.5b | 425.6b | 44.82b | 31.17b | 16.27ab |
| 3 | 9.26c | 6.17c | 4.50c | 1.04a | 0.00a | 0.00 | 42.96bc | 41.38ab | 39.45b | 18427c | 12773ab | 9732c | 414.6c | 378.3bc | 482.1c | 45.98bc | 34.70bc | 20.57bc |
| 4 | 9.74c | 7.77d | 4.27c | 6.00a | 1.67a | 0.00 | 42.03ab | 42.01ab | 38.27ab | 19772d | 15860bc | 9401c | 408.1c | 422.6c | 480.0c | 49.17c | 38.30c | 19.92bc |
| 5 | 11.25d | 8.65e | 4.97c | 18.54b | 3.75a | 0.00 | 43.32c | 42.84b | 38.08ab | 22280e | 17302c | 11084c | 390.8c | 404.1bc | 514.0c | 58.03d | 43.65d | 21.74c |
| 6 | 8.90e | 4.52c | 16.25b | 0.00 | 41.30a | 37.27a | 18453ab | 10335c | 407.9bc | 504.6c | 45.76d | 20.75c | ||||||
| N treatment p value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Variety (V) p value | 0.164 | 0.132 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| V x N p value | 0.290 | 0.990 | 0.191 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.094 | <0.001 | 0.101 | 0.024 | 0.826 | 0.506 | 0.451 | 0.079 | 0.114 | 0.147 | 0.815 | |
Fig. 2Improvements in oat grain UHPLC-MS methodology (a) and example MS/MS identifications of Avenacoside B (b) and Avenanthramide 2p (A) (c). MS/MS Avenacoside B and Avenanthramide 2p (A) annotations based upon Wang et al., 2017, de Bruijn et al., 2019, respectively. BPC Base Peak Chromatogram; Glc Glucose; Rha Rhamnose; AvA Avenanthramide A; AA Anthranilic acid; PA Phenylalkenoic acid.
Fig. 3Central metabolite responses to increasing nitrogen level: (a) hierarchical cluster analysis applied to the response of metabolic features to nitrogen using Spearman Rho as the distance metric. Normalised values were scaled (+3 > -3) and a false colour code applied to generate the heat map; (b) Bar plot of total amino acids responding to nitrogen; (c) Bar plot of total organic acids responding to nitrogen; (d) Bar plot of di-, tri- and poly-saccharides responding to nitrogen. Error bars represent the standard error. Replication n3.
Fig. 4Lipid responses to increasing nitrogen level: (a) hierarchical cluster analysis applied to the response of metabolic features to nitrogen using Spearman Rho as the distance metric. Normalised values were scaled (+3 > -3) and a false colour code applied to generate the heat map; (b) Bar plot of total Lyso PC’s responding to nitrogen; (c) Bar plot of total Lyso PE’s responding to nitrogen; (d) Bar plot of total Lyso PS’s responding to nitrogen; (e) Bar plot of total Lyso PG’s responding to nitrogen. Error bars represent the standard error. Replication n3.
Fig. 5Secondary metabolite responses to increasing nitrogen level: (a) hierarchical cluster analysis applied to the response of metabolic features to nitrogen using Spearman Rho as the distance metric. Normalised values were scaled (+3 > -3) and a false colour code applied to generate the heat map; (b) Bar plot of total avenanthramides and avenanthramide-hexosides responding to nitrogen. Error bars represent the standard error. Replication n3.