Literature DB >> 33797665

Implementation Quality Impacts Fourth Grade Students' Participation in Physically Active Academic Lessons.

Vanessa L Errisuriz1,2, Erin E Dooley3,4, Katie G Burford5,4, Ashleigh M Johnson4,6, Esbelle M Jowers5, John B Bartholomew5.   

Abstract

It is important to assess implementation of active learning interventions to maximize their impact. Implementation quality, or how well one engages program participants, has been less studied than other implementation components (e.g., dose, fidelity). This cross-sectional, exploratory study examined associations between teacher engagement behaviors, quality of teacher engagement (i.e., teacher feedback), and student physical activity outcomes during active classroom lessons. This study used data from the Texas Initiatives for Children's Activity and Nutrition (I-CAN!) randomized controlled trial. Fixed effects regressions investigated the impact of teacher engagement behaviors on student physical activity outcomes. Bivariate correlations examined associations between teacher feedback and student physical activity outcomes. A latent profile analysis explored whether there were subsets of teachers with similar feedback profiles. The final analytic sample included 82 teachers. Teacher-directed changes and teacher participation in physical activity were each associated with higher ratings for how many and how often children were active during lessons. Teacher participation in physical activity was also significantly related to higher ratings for student physical activity intensity (all p < .05). Physical Activity Reinforcement and Technical Instruction feedback were positively associated with activity intensity (r = - .20, p < .05 and r = .34, p < .01, respectively). Technical Instruction feedback was positively associated with how many (r = .25, p < .01) and how often (r = .41, p < .01) students were active during lessons. Negative feedback was negatively associated with how often (r = - .25, p < .05) students were active and activity intensity (r = - .25, p < .05). Game Instruction was negatively related to how often students were active (r = -.23, p < .05). All teachers were represented by high levels of Game Instruction and Classroom Management feedback, moderate levels of Content Reinforcement and Content Instruction feedback, and low levels of Negative, Technical Instruction, and Physical Activity Reinforcement feedback. These data did not indicate the existence of multiple feedback profiles. Findings suggest that teacher engagement and feedback to students during active lessons can promote student physical activity. Teachers are primarily responsible for implementing school-based interventions, so it is critical to develop strategies that increase their ability to implement them successfully. Opportunities to maximize intervention delivery, such as co-designing with teachers, should be utilized when designing school-based, physical activity interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Implementation quality; Intervention; Physical activity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33797665     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01233-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  20 in total

Review 1.  A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.

Authors:  Linda Dusenbury; Rosalind Brannigan; Mathea Falco; William B Hansen
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2003-04

2.  Studying Program Implementation Is Not Easy but It Is Essential.

Authors:  Joseph A Durlak
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-11

3.  Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation.

Authors:  Cady Berkel; Anne M Mauricio; Erin Schoenfelder; Irwin N Sandler
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2011-03

Review 4.  Physically active academic lessons in elementary children.

Authors:  John B Bartholomew; Esbelle M Jowers
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Implementation quality and positive experiences in after-school programs.

Authors:  Amanda Brown Cross; Denise C Gottfredson; Denise M Wilson; Melissa Rorie; Nadine Connell
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2010-06

6.  A cluster randomized control trial to assess the impact of active learning on child activity, attention control, and academic outcomes: The Texas I-CAN trial.

Authors:  John B Bartholomew; Esbelle M Jowers; Vanessa L Errisuriz; Sharon Vaughn; Gregory Roberts
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 7.  School-based physical activity promotion: a conceptual framework for research and practice.

Authors:  Russell L Carson; Darla M Castelli; Aaron Beighle; Heather Erwin
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 8.  Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Johannes W de Greeff; Roel J Bosker; Jaap Oosterlaan; Chris Visscher; E Hartman
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.319

9.  Implementing physically active learning: Future directions for research, policy, and practice.

Authors:  Andy Daly-Smith; Thomas Quarmby; Victoria S J Archbold; Ash C Routen; Jade L Morris; Catherine Gammon; John B Bartholomew; Geir Kåre Resaland; Bryn Llewellyn; Richard Allman; Henry Dorling
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 7.179

10.  Active Learning Increases Children's Physical Activity across Demographic Subgroups.

Authors:  John B Bartholomew; Esbelle M Jowers; Gregory Roberts; Anna-Mária Fall; Vanessa L Errisuriz; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  Transl J Am Coll Sports Med       Date:  2018-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.