Literature DB >> 33796931

Smartphone-enabled field monitoring tool for rapid hexavalent chromium detection in water.

Sushant D Bamane1, Vinod Bhojwani2,3,4, Pradeep L Balkunde1, Mainak Bhattacharya2,3, Ishan Gupta1, Ashwini K Mohapatra2,3, Aditya Shekhar2,3,5, Abhas Singh6,7.   

Abstract

Chromium contamination of soil and water is a serious environmental and public health concern as the hexavalent form of chromium [Cr(VI)] is readily soluble in water and is a confirmed carcinogen. There is an imminent need for a robust, low-cost, and simple analytical technique to facilitate in situ monitoring of Cr(VI) in water. Current quantitative methods of Cr(VI) detection are largely laboratory-based, time-consuming, expensive, and require training for implementation. In this contribution, a portable, easy-to-use, and compact measuring tool is presented that provides Cr(VI) concentration within 10 min of water sampling over a linear range of 0-3 mg L-1. This tool utilizes a relatively inexpensive camera-enabled smartphone with a custom-made test chamber attachment to seamlessly perform Cr(VI) measurements on water samples in the field. For analysis, an android-based software application was developed that directs the user to perform a simple series of steps following the diphenylcarbazide-based colorimetric method prescribed by the American Public Health Association. The tool was validated against a standard UV-visible spectrophotometer for a variety of synthetic and naturally contaminated water samples, with correlation factors greater than 0.993 (p < .001). The colorimetric method was also validated against a non-colorimetric Cr(VI) detection technique-ion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Furthermore, Cr(VI) detection limits for the smartphone-enabled colorimetric method were found to be within 1.3-11.6 μg L-1, which were significantly better than reported for commercially available field test kits, and even surpassed the limits exhibited by a typical spectrophotometer (25-50 μg L-1). Finally, real-time mapping of source waters at a contaminated site was demonstrated by remote logging of Cr(VI) water quality data and corresponding GPS coordinates into a cloud server. This study highlights the potential role of smartphone-based monitoring tool in providing information to the affected community and enabling safe access to drinking water. An accurate, robust, simple-to-use, and economic method to measure hexavalent chromium in water within 10 min of sampling at site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cr(VI) detection in water; Optical sensors; Real-time mapping of contaminated zones; Smartphone-based test kit

Year:  2021        PMID: 33796931     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03291-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  19 in total

1.  Monitoring of fluoride in water samples using a smartphone.

Authors:  Saurabh Levin; Sunderrajan Krishnan; Samuel Rajkumar; Nischal Halery; Pradeep Balkunde
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Smartphone-based simultaneous pH and nitrite colorimetric determination for paper microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Nuria Lopez-Ruiz; Vincenzo F Curto; Miguel M Erenas; Fernando Benito-Lopez; Dermot Diamond; Alberto J Palma; Luis F Capitan-Vallvey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Chromium VI and stomach cancer: a meta-analysis of the current epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Roberta Welling; James J Beaumont; Scott J Petersen; George V Alexeeff; Craig Steinmaus
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium.

Authors:  Konstantin Salnikow; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  Ecotoxicology of hexavalent chromium in freshwater fish: a critical review.

Authors:  Venkatramreddy Velma; S S Vutukuru; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.458

Review 6.  Sampling and analysis considerations for the determination of hexavalent chromium in workplace air.

Authors:  Kevin Ashley; Alan M Howe; Martine Demange; Olle Nygren
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2003-10

7.  Effect of nine years of animal waste deposition on profile distribution of heavy metals in Abeokuta, south-western Nigeria and its implication for environmental quality.

Authors:  J O Azeez; I O Adekunle; O O Atiku; K B Akande; S O Jamiu-Azeez
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 8.  Processes affecting the remediation of chromium-contaminated sites.

Authors:  C D Palmer; P R Wittbrodt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Smartphone-Based in-Gel Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (gLAMP) System Enables Rapid Coliphage MS2 Quantification in Environmental Waters.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Xingyu Lin; Katharina Urmann; Lijie Li; Xing Xie; Sunny Jiang; Michael R Hoffmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Detection and spatial mapping of mercury contamination in water samples using a smart-phone.

Authors:  Qingshan Wei; Richie Nagi; Kayvon Sadeghi; Steve Feng; Eddie Yan; So Jung Ki; Romain Caire; Derek Tseng; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.