| Literature DB >> 33796474 |
Hee-Jeong Yang1, Decheng Wang2,3, Xin Wen2,3, Danielle M Weiner1,4, Laura E Via1,4,5.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health problem despite almost universal efforts to provide patients with highly effective chemotherapy, in part, because many infected individuals are not diagnosed and treated, others do not complete treatment, and a small proportion harbor Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains that have become resistant to drugs in the standard regimen. Development and approval of new drugs for TB have accelerated in the last 10 years, but more drugs are needed due to both Mtb's development of resistance and the desire to shorten therapy to 4 months or less. The drug development process needs predictive animal models that recapitulate the complex pathology and bacterial burden distribution of human disease. The human host response to pulmonary infection with Mtb is granulomatous inflammation usually resulting in contained lesions and limited bacterial replication. In those who develop progressive or active disease, regions of necrosis and cavitation can develop leading to lasting lung damage and possible death. This review describes the major vertebrate animal models used in evaluating compound activity against Mtb and the disease presentation that develops. Each of the models, including the zebrafish, various mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and non-human primates provides data on number of Mtb bacteria and pathology resolution. The models where individual lesions can be dissected from the tissue or sampled can also provide data on lesion-specific bacterial loads and lesion-specific drug concentrations. With the inclusion of medical imaging, a compound's effect on resolution of pathology within individual lesions and animals can also be determined over time. Incorporation of measurement of drug exposure and drug distribution within animals and their tissues is important for choosing the best compounds to push toward the clinic and to the development of better regimens. We review the practical aspects of each model and the advantages and limitations of each in order to promote choosing a rational combination of them for a compound's development.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; animal model; chemotherapy; drug development; guinea pig; non-human primate; rabbit; zebrafish
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33796474 PMCID: PMC8008060 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.613149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Zebrafish infection sites and zebrafish larva infected with M. marinum. (A) Bright field image of sites used for microinjection of the pathogen including otic vesicle, hindbrain, caudal vein, tail and trunk. Fluorescence and bright field overlay image of transgenic zebrafish with Dendra2-expressing neutrophils (green) after injection of tdTomato-expressing Mm (red) into the OV site after 1 min (B) and 120 min (C) showing neutrophil migration. Scale bar equals 500 μm.
Vertebrate animal models typically used for tuberculosis drug testing, relevant characteristics, types of studies they contribute to in elucidating the human disease state.
| Model strains(Mycobacterium species used) | Infection weight or (age) | Types of lesions typically observed | Special features & Typical chemotherapyuses | Main References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Non-necrotizing/cellular lesions, | BSL-2 Model | ( |
|
| 18–25 g | Non-necrotizing, cellular lesions | Initial PK/PD, Reticulocyte toxicity, Efficacy in acute and chronic infection, LTBI, Relapse rates | ( |
| C3HeB/FeJ | 20–50 g | Full spectrum of cellular, granulocytic pneumonia, caseous necrotic, and cavitary lesions | Efficacy in acute and chronic infection, Relapse rates, LTBI, drug penetration | ( |
| Humanized | ~21 g | Cellular lesions, caseous necrotic lesions, coalescing parenchyma. | Efficacy in acute and chronic infection, | ( |
|
| 300–1,000 g | Cellular lesions, granulocytic pneumonia, caseous necrotic lesions, | Efficacy in acute and chronic disease, HDT, modeling co-morbidities | ( |
|
| 3–5 kg | Full spectrum of cellular, granulomatous, granulocytic pneumonia, cavitary and frequent spontaneously healing lesions | PK/PD, | ( |
|
| 250–450 g | Full spectrum of cellular, granulomatous, granulocytic pneumonia, cavitary and rare spontaneously healing lesions | PK/PD, | ( |
|
| 3–9 kg | Full spectrum of cellular, granulomatous, granulocytic pneumonia, cavitary and frequent spontaneously healing lesions | PK/PD, | ( |
Laboratory Animal Medicine (Fox et al., 2015).
Figure 2Illustration of granulomatous, necrotizing lesions in the lungs of the model animals experimentally infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. C3HeB/FeJ mouse (A); guinea pig (B); NZW rabbit (C); marmoset (D); rhesus macaque (E); and a comparative human lesion (F). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The region of central necrosis in the lesions is marked with an N. Scale bars indicate 400 μm.
Figure 3FDG PET/CTs of a rabbit (A), marmoset (B), and rhesus macaque (C) with cavitary disease. The animals were infected for 69 to 90 days with M. tuberculosis at the time of imaging. Cavities (blue arrows) have been partially emptied of their necrotic contents and filled with air indicated by a darker central region in the lesions (lower density) surrounded by lighter walls (higher density). The scales show the range of CT Hounsfield units from higher to low density in shades of gray (+400 to −1000) on the left and FDG uptake in PET standard uptake units/body weight from high to low uptake in bright yellow to red to black (14 to 0) on the right. The width of the animal’s midsection is indicated with a bar and label to highlight the difference in size of the three animals.