| Literature DB >> 33796069 |
Shivshankar Thanigaimani1,2, Jonathan Golledge1,2,3.
Abstract
Improved understanding of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) pathogenesis is required to identify treatment targets. This systematic review summarized evidence from animal studies and clinical research examining the role of adipokines and perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) in AAA pathogenesis. Meta-analyses suggested that leptin (Standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.62, 2.61]) and adiponectin (SMD: -3.16 [95% CI: -7.59, 1.28]) upregulation did not significantly affect AAA severity within animal models. There were inconsistent findings and limited studies investigating the effect of resistin-like molecule-beta (RELMβ) and PVAT in animal models of AAA. Clinical studies suggested that circulating leptin (SMD: 0.32 [95% CI: 0.19, 0.45]) and resistin (SMD: 0.63 [95% CI 0.50, 0.76]) concentrations and PVAT to abdominal adipose tissue ratio (SMD: 0.56 [95% CI 0.33, 0.79]) were significantly greater in people diagnosed with AAA compared to controls. Serum adiponectin levels were not associated with AAA diagnosis (SMD: -0.62 [95% CI -1.76, 0.52]). One, eight, and one animal studies and two, two, and four human studies had low, moderate, and high risk-of-bias respectively. These findings suggest that AAA is associated with higher circulating concentrations of leptin and resistin and greater amounts of PVAT than controls but whether this plays a role in aneurysm pathogenesis is unclear.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; adipokine; adipose tissue; aortic rupture; periaortic adipose tissue
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33796069 PMCID: PMC8008472 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.618434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of the animal studies.
Figure 2PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of the human studies.
Animal studies investigating the role of adipokines and PVAT in AAA.
| Ref | Animal strain | Intervention | AAA model | Groups | Sample size | Assessment period | Aortic diameter (mm) | Mechanisms implicated in AAA formation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| ( | C57BL/6J mice | Peri-aortic leptin application | Ang-II | Placebo | 16 | 28 days | 1.5 ± 0.1 | Para-visceral aortic leptin in ApoE–/– mice induces local medial degeneration and augments angiotensin II-induced AAA. |
| Leptin + Ang-II | 16 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | ||||||
| ( | C57BL/6J mice | Germline deficiency in leptin | Ang-II | Control | 10 | 28 days | NR | Leptin deficient obese mice exhibiting AAAs had greater macrophage content in visceral adipose tissue than mice not developing AAA. |
| High-fat | 25 | |||||||
| LDLr−/− | 7 | |||||||
| Leptin−/− Ob+ | 10 | |||||||
| Leptin−/− Ob/Ob | 10 | |||||||
| ( | C57BL/6J mice | Diet induced obesity | CaCl2 | ApoE−/− no WAT control | 9 | 28 days | 0.1 ± 0.03 | Perivascular implantation of adipose tissue from either diet induced obese mice or lean mice exacerbated AAA development, but this was abolished in leptin-deficient obese mice. |
| ApoE−/− obese WAT | 7 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | ||||||
| ApoE−/− lean WAT | 9 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | ||||||
| ApoE−/− Ncc−/− IL18r−/− obese WAT | 8 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | ||||||
| ( | C57BL/6J mice | I.P. injection | Ang-II | Sham + Saline | 8 | 28 days | 1.0 ± 0.2 | Pre-treatment with leptin significantly downregulated protein expression of the Th2 cytokine IL-4 and mRNA levels of GATA-3, the key transcription factor for Th2 polarization, and significantly upregulated Th1 cytokine INF-γ and T-bet, the key transcription factor for Th1 polarization |
| Ang-II control | 12 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | ||||||
| Ang-II + leptin | 12 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ( | ApoE−/−mice | Recombinant adenoviral vector encoding mouse adiponectin | Ang-II | PBS-infused control (LDLr−/−) | 8 | 56 days | 0.51 ± 0.05 | APN inhibited the angiotensin type-1 receptor (AT1R), inflammatory cytokine and mast cell protease expression, and induced upregulation of LOX in the aortic wall, improved systemic cytokine profile and attenuated adipose inflammation, thus preventing AAA |
| AdAPN mice (LDLr−/−) | 8 | 0.53 ± 0.12 | ||||||
| AdGFP mice (LDLr−/−) | 12 | 0.88 ± 0.45 | ||||||
| ( | C57BL/6J mice | Adiponectin gene deficiency | Ang-II | Control AAA | 18 | 28 days | 1.67 ± 0.09 | Adiponectin-deficiency augmented the early infiltration of macrophages and increased the expression of pro-inflammatory factors in the dilated aortic wall, contributing to the elevated incidence of AAA |
| APN−/− AAA | 18 | 2.12 ± 0.07 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ( | ApoE−/− mice | Deletion of RELMβ | Ang-II | AAA only | 15 | 28 days | 1.0 ± 0.1 | Deletion of RELMβ may reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, MMP-2 and MMP-9 |
| Sham | 15 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | ||||||
| Si-NC | 15 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | ||||||
| Si- RELMβ | 15 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | ||||||
| ( | ApoE−/− mice | RELMβ mRNA and protein levels | Ang-II | Control | NR | 28 days | NR | Increased RELMβ mRNA and protein levels contribute to aneurysm formation |
| AAA | NR | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ( | C57BL/6J mice | Deletion of AT1a in PVAT | Ang-II | AAA | 13 | 28 days | 2.5 ± 1.8 | Induction of macrophage migration by conditioned medium from angiotensin II–stimulated wild-type adipocytes was suppressed by treatment with an Osteopontin-neutralizing antibody. VAT transplantation more potently attenuated aortic aneurysm formation in OPN deficient mice than wild type |
| AAA with OPN−/− | 11 | 1.2 ± 0.7 | ||||||
| ( | Sprague-Dawley rats | Peri-aortic PVAT removed | Hypo-perfusion | PVAT intact | 5 | 28 days | NR | PVAT plays important roles in the differentiation of MSCs into adipocytes in response to vascular hypo-perfusion. The decreased number of adipocytes in the PVAT-removed vascular wall might be associated with the decreased AAA diameter. |
| PVAT removed | 7 | |||||||
| Control | 18 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | ||||||
AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; APN, Adiponectin; ADMSC, Adipose derived MSC; AdAPN, Recombinant adenoviral APN; AdGFP, Recombinant adenovirus green fluorescent protein; Ang, Angiotensin; ApoE, Apolipoprotein E; AT1a, Ang-II type 1a; BMSC, Bone marrow derived stem cells; CaCl2, Calcium chloride; CD, Clustered differentiation; G-CSF, Granulocyte colony stimulating factor; IL-18r, Interleukin 18 receptor; WT, Wild type; NCC, Na-Cl co-transporter; GATA, Erythroid transcription factor; HDL, High density lipoprotein; HF/HF, High-fat diet acclimatization for 20 weeks followed by high-fat diet continuation for another 8 weeks; HF/LF, High-fat diet acclimatization for 20 weeks followed by low fat diet for another 8 weeks; I.P., Intraperitoneal; INF, Interferon; IP-10, Interferon gamma-induced protein 10; LOX, Lysyl oxidase; LDL, Low density lipoprotein; LePA, Leptin antagonist; mRNA, Messenger Ribonucleic acid; MSC, Mesenchymal stem cells; MCP, Monocyte chemoattractant protein; MMP, Matrix metalloproteinase; NC, Negative control; NA, Not available; NR, Not reported; OPN, Osteopontin; ob/ob, Obese mice; PLGA, Poly lactic- co- glycolic acid; PVAT, Perivascular adipose tissue; RELMβ, Resistin-like molecule-beta; si, Small RNA inference; Th, T helper cells; TG, Triglycerides; VAT, Visceral adipose tissue; WAT, White adipose tissue; ^Aortic lumen diameters not different, however, maximal diameters were significantly different.
Figure 3The included studies had contrasting findings most likely due to the varied methods of leptin upregulation. The meta-analysis suggested that overall upregulation of leptin had no effect on AAA diameter. Ne, Number of animals in experimental group; Nc, Number of animals in control group.
Figure 4Meta-analysis suggested that upregulation of adiponectin had no significant effect on AAA diameter. Ne, Number of animals in experimental group; Nc, Number of animals in control group.
Quality assessment of animal studies investigating the effect of adipokines and PVAT in AAA.
| Reference | Reported the ethics approval | Reported animal strain used in each group | Reported animal age in each group | Reported the number of animals used in each group | Reported the sample size estimate | Explained the methods for AAA model development | Relevant controls included | Reported aortic diameter in both AAA and controls as Mean ± SD or SEM | Reported the methods used to assess aortic diameter | Reported the reproducibility of aortic diameter assessment | Mentioned the methods to randomize the animals between groups | Assessors were blinded during the cytokine/AAA assessment experiments | Total score | Quality score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 66.6 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 83.3 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 58.3 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 66.7 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 66.7 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 66.7 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 66.7 |
| ( | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 37.5 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 66.7 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 50 |
AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; PVAT, Perivascular adipose tissue; SD, Standard deviation; SEM, Standard error of the mean; %, Percentage; Yes, 1; No, 0; Total score of 12, 100%.
Examples of clinical studies investigating the association of adipokines with AAA.
| Reference | Study design | Groups | Sample size | Aortic diameter | Adipokine levels/HR [95% CI]* | p value | Confounders adjusted for analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| ( | Case control study | Control | 20 | NR$ | 9.9 ± 9.2 | <0.05 | None |
| Small AAA | 16 | 3.6 ± 0.7$ | 19.2 ± 8.2 | ||||
| Large AAA | 77 | 5.9 ± 1.4$ (cm) | 30.4 ± 13.9 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| ( | Retrospective cohort study | AAA | 701 | NR | HR: | NR | Age, sex, race, smoking status, pack-years of smoking, height, hypertension, HDL, LDL, TC, and PAD |
| ( | Prospective cohort study | No AAA | 174 | NR | 7.3 (4.7–11.4) | 0.19 | Age, smoking, BMI, carotid artery stenosis, DM, arterial hypertension, HDL, LDL, TC, TG, CRP, and statins |
| AAA | 15 | NR | 9.7 (4.9–17.3) | ||||
| ( | Cohort from population based RCT | Control | 634 | 19–22# (mm) | 12.6 ± 9.9 | <0.01 | Age, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, CHD, DM, WHR, and serum glucose |
| AAA | 318 | ≥30 (mm) | 16.5 ± 16.7 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| ( | Prospective cohort study | No AAA | 174 | NR | 9.4 (7.6–12.3) | 0.08 | Age, smoking, BMI, carotid artery stenosis, DM, arterial hypertension, HDL, LDL, TC, TG, adiponectin, leptin, CRP, and statins |
| AAA | 15 | NR | 12.7 (8.5–16.8) | ||||
| ( | Cohort from population based RCT | Control | 634 | 19–22# (mm) | 20.7 ± 10.5 | <0.01 | Age, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, CHD, DM, WHR, and serum glucose |
| AAA | 318 | ≥30 (mm) | 27.6 ± 12.1 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| ( | Prospective cohort study | No AAA | 174 | NR | 4.2 (2.7–6.4) | 0.86 | Age, smoking, BMI, carotid artery stenosis, DM, arterial hypertension, HDL, LDL, TC, TG, leptin, CRP, and statins |
| AAA | 15 | NR | 3.5 (2.1–11.5) | ||||
| ( | Cohort from population based RCT | Control | 634 | 19–22# (mm) | 9.9 ± 4.7 | <0.01 | Age, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, CHD, DM, WHR, and serum glucose |
| AAA | 318 | ≥30 (mm) | 10.8 ± 4.7 | ||||
| ( | Case control study | Control | 9 | NR | 97.5 ± 39.4 | NR | None |
| AAA | 19 | 63.0 ± 12.2$ | 27.8 ± 5.4 | ||||
AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; BMI, Body mass index; CHD, Coronary heart disease; CI, Confidence interval; CRP, C reactive protein; cm, Centimeter; DM, Diabetes mellitus; DPP-4, Dipeptidyl peptidase-4; HR, Hazard ratio; HDL, High density lipoprotein; LDL, Low density lipoprotein; NR, Not reported; mm, Millimeter; PAD, Peripheral artery disease; RCT, Randomized controlled trial; TC, Total cholesterol; TG, Triglycerides; WHR, Waist to hip ratio; *Adipokine levels were either mentioned as mean ± S.D. or median (25th–75th percentile range); **Adipokine levels data extracted from graph; ᵟSub-analysis data assessed adipokines from a larger cohort; #Aortic diameter measured using ultrasound (US); $Aortic diameter measured using Computed tomography (CT).
Figure 5Forest plot suggesting the association of high circulating leptin concentrations with AAA diagnosis. Ne, Number of patients in experimental group; Nc, Number of patients in control group.
Figure 6Forest plot suggesting the association of high circulating resistin concentrations with AAA diagnosis. Ne, Number of patients in experimental group; Nc, Number of patients in control group.
Figure 7Forest plot suggesting no association of circulating adiponectin concentrations with AAA diagnosis. Ne, Number of patients in experimental group; Nc, Number of patients in control group.
Examples of clinical studies investigating the association of perivascular adipose tissue with AAA.
| Reference | Study design | Groups | Sample size | Aortic diameter | PVAT to AAT ratio | p value | Confounders adjusted for analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | Retrospective case control study | Control | 97 | 2.0 ± 0.2$ (cm) | 1.2 ± 0.7* | 0.006 | Gender, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, CHD, PAD, BMI, anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, vasodilator, diuretics, CCB, BB, statins |
| AIOD | 104 | 2.1 ± 0.4$ (cm) | 1.2 ± 0.8* | ||||
| aAAA | 140 | 6.1 ± 1.4$ (cm) | 1.5 ± 0.7* | ||||
| ( | Case control study | AAA | 196 | 50.0 (42.0–57.0)$ (mm) | 0.5 (0.4, 0.6)** | 0.007 | Age, CHD, diabetes, ever smoked, sex and hypertension |
| IC | 181 | 21.0 (20.0–24.0)$ (mm) | 0.4 (0.3, 0.5)** | ||||
| ( | Framingham Heart - Longitudinal cohort study | AAA in women | 1,474 | 17 ± 2$ (mm) | HR (95% CI): | <0.01 | Age, sex, cardiometabolic risk factors, and BMI |
| AAA in men | 1,527 | 19 ± 2$ (mm) |
AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; aAAA, Asymptomatic AAA; AAT, Abdominal peri-aortic fat; AIOD, Aortoiliac occlusive disease; BB, Beta blockers; BMI, Body mass index; CCB, Calcium channel blockers; CHD, Coronary heart disease; CI, Confidence interval; cm, Centimeter; HR, Hazard ratio; IC, Intermittent claudication; mm, Millimeter; PAD, Peripheral artery disease; PVAT, Perivascular adipose tissue; VAT/SAT, Visceral adipose tissue/subcutaneous adipose tissue; *Data reported as mean ± Standard deviation; **Data reported as median with 25th and 75th percentile range; ᵟ, Data reported as hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval; $Aortic diameter measured using Computed tomography (CT).
Figure 8Forest plot suggesting a significant association between greater perivascular adipose tissue to abdominal adipose tissue ratio and AAA diagnosis. Ne, Number of patients in experimental group; Nc, Number of patients in control group.
Quality assessment of clinical studies investigating the role of adipokines and PVAT in AAA.
| Reference | Sample size estimate reported | Age matched controls | Sex matched controls | Controls and AAA cases imaged | Method of aortic diameter imaging | Method of AAA diameter assessment | Analysis by blinded observer | Confounders were adjusted for analyses | Total | Quality score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 25 |
| ( | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 37.5 |
| ( | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 25 |
| ( | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 75 |
| ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12.5 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 100 |
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 87.5 |
| ( | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 62.5 |
AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; PVAT, Perivascular adipose tissue; %, Percentage; Yes = 1; No = 0; Score of 8 = 100%.