| Literature DB >> 36187757 |
Xuming Wang1,2, Bin He2, Yisen Deng1,2, Jingwen Liu1, Zhaohua Zhang1, Weiliang Sun3, Yanxiang Gao4, Xiaopeng Liu2, Yanan Zhen2, Zhidong Ye2, Peng Liu1,2, Jianyan Wen1,2.
Abstract
Objective: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) refers to unusual permanent dilation of the abdominal aorta, and gradual AAA expansion can lead to fatal rupture. However, we lack clear understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease. The effect of perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) on vascular functional status has attracted increasing attention. Here, we try to identify the potential mechanisms linking AAA and PVAT.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; bioinformatics; biomarker; immune infiltration; perivascular adipose tissue
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187757 PMCID: PMC9523244 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.977910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
FIGURE 1Intra-group repeatability for GSE119717 dataset. (A) All samples from the GSE119717 dataset were analyzed by principal component analysis. Principal component 1 is on the X-axis; principal component 2 is on the Y-axis. (B) Volcano plot showing DEGs between the two groups. X-axis represents the |log fold change|; Y-axis represents the p-value (log-scaled). The red dots represent the up-regulated DEGs and the blue dot represents the down-regulated DEGs. (C) Heatmap visualizing DEGs between the two groups.
FIGURE 2Enrichment of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) via (A) Metascape, (B) ClueGo and (C) DAVID.
FIGURE 3Feature gene and its diagnostic value. (A) Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and hub genes: FOS, JUN, ATF3, DUSP1, EGR1. (B) LASSO coefficient profiles. (C) Identification of the optimal penalization coefficient (lambda) in the Lasso regression and the minimum absolute contraction criterion. (D) A plot of feature genes selected by SVM-RFE machine learning. The red dot represents the best five variables. (E) Venn plot demonstrates FOS was an important marker combined by LASSO, SVM-RFE and hub genes. (F) The diagnostic performance of FOS according to its expression. AUC, area under the ROC curve.
FIGURE 4The immune cells infiltration between dilated and non-dilated groups. (A) The difference between dilated and non-dilated PVAT groups. Red area represents dilated group and blue area represents non-dilated group. p < 0.05 was considered as significant. (B) Correlation heatmap of immune cells. Red represents positive correlation and blue represents negative correlation. (C) The percentage of each immune cell in each sample. (D) The correlation between FOS and immune cells.
FIGURE 5Construction of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) mouse model. (A) Change of blood pressure, body weight, and diameter of the abdominal aorta over 28 days and representative images of harvested hearts and vessels from control and AAA mice. N = 6, results are expressed as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Data were analyzed using student t-test. Representative images of (B) H-E staining, Masson’s staining, and van Gieson staining of the abdominal aorta from control and AAA mice. Scale bar = 100 μm.
FIGURE 6FOS expression in PVAT of control and AAA mice. (A) Immunohistochemistry staining of FOS expression. Scale bar = 50μm. *p < 0.05. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. (B) Western blot analysis and corresponding quantification of FOS expression (GAPDH is loading control), *p < 0.05. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.