| Literature DB >> 33795775 |
Nicola Boccella1, Roberta Paolillo1, Lorena Coretti2,3,4,5, Stefania D'Apice1, Francesca Lembo6,7, Cinzia Perrino8, Adriano Lama3,5, Giuseppe Giugliano1, Gabriele Giacomo Schiattarella1, Mariella Cuomo9, Ilaria d'Aquino10, Gina Cavaliere11, Orlando Paciello5,10, Maria Pina Mollica5,11, Giuseppina Mattace Raso3,5, Giovanni Esposito1.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that modifications of gut function and microbiota composition might play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure (HF). In this study we systematically analysed gut microbiota composition, intestinal barrier integrity, intestinal and serum cytokines and serum endotoxin levels in C57BL/6 mice undergoing pressure overload by transverse aortic constriction (TAC) for 1 and 4 weeks. Compared to sham-operated animals, TAC induced prompt and strong weakening of intestinal barrier integrity, long-lasting decrease of colon anti-inflammatory cytokine levels, significant increases of serum levels of bacterial lipopolysaccharide and proinflammatory cytokines. TAC also exerted effects on microbiota composition, inducing significant differences in bacterial genera inside Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and TM7 phyla as shown by 16S rDNA sequencing of fecal samples from TAC or sham mice. These results suggest that gut modifications represent an important element to be considered in the development and progression of cardiac dysfunction in response to TAC and support this animal model as a valuable tool to establish the role and mechanisms of gut-heart crosstalk in HF. Evidence arising in this field might identify new treatment options targeting gut integrity and microbiota components to face adverse cardiac events.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33795775 PMCID: PMC8016915 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86651-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Cardiac morphometry and echocardiography of mice from the different groups.
| Morphometry | Sham 1w | TAC 1w | Sham 4w | TAC 4w |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 4) | (n = 4) | (n = 15) | (n = 18) | |
| BW, g | 23.9 ± 0.6 | 23.7 ± 0.6 | 26.1 ± 0.7 | 24.9 ± 0.6 |
| LVW, mg | 80.2 ± 1.5 | 114.7 ± 8.1* | 88.4 ± 3.3 | 149.0 ± 6.4*# |
| HW, mg | 110.0 ± 2.7 | 150.1 ± 10.2* | 124.1 ± 4.7 | 193.3 ± 8.4*# |
| LVW/BW, mg/g | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.5* | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.4* |
| HW/BW, mg/g | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 7.0 ± 0.7* | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.3* |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. An unpaired Student’s t-test was performed for each pair of four groups and subsequent multiple comparisons were made with use of the Tukey method. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant (*p < 0.05 vs. correspondent sham; #p < 0.05 vs. correspondent TAC 1w).
BW Body weight, LVW left ventricle weight, HW heart weight, LVEDd left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVESd left ventricular end-systolic diameter, IVSd interventricular septum end-diastolic diameter, PWd posterior wall end-diastolic diameter, FS fractional shortening, EF ejection fraction, HR heart rate.
Figure 1Effects of TAC or sham surgery on intestinal barrier integrity. (A) Abdominal aortic blood flow (cm/s) was evaluated at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days after surgical procedure in sham and TAC mice by Pulsed Wave Doppler (sham n = 6; TAC n = 10). (B,C) mRNA expression levels of occludin (Ocln, B) and tight junction protein ZO-1 (Tjp1, C) in colon samples from sham or TAC mice (sham: n = 3–4; TAC: n = 3–6). (D) Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis of tight junction protein ZO-1 in colon samples from the different groups of mice (sham 1w: n = 6; sham 4w: n = 5; TAC 1w: n = 4; TAC 4w: n = 6). ZO-1 positive cells were stained in brown; bigger brown and deeper color represent higher ZO-1 protein levels. Pictures are shown at 20 × and 40 × magnification. (E) Plasma levels of FITC-dextran 4000 at 15 min, 1, 2, 4 h after gavage in sham 1w and TAC 1w mice (sham 1w: n = 14; TAC 1w: n = 12). (F) Plasma levels of FITC-dextran 4000 1 h after gavage in sham 4w and TAC 4w (sham 4w: n = 4; TAC 4w: n = 4). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significances were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparison post-hoc test (A) or Tukey’s comparison test as appropriate (B–F).
Figure 2Effects of TAC or sham surgery on inflammation. (A) mRNA expression levels of Interleukin-10 (Il10) in colon samples (sham: n = 3–4; TAC: n = 3–6). (B) Representative hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections from colon tissues of mice at original magnifications ×20 and ×40. Histological evaluation of inflammatory cells infiltration was scored along the entire colon length, inspecting the colon mucosa, submucosa and transmural areas considering the following parameters: (a) severity of inflammatory cell infiltration (sham 1w = 0.83 ± 0.16, sham 4w = 1.40 ± 0.24, TAC 1w = 2.25 ± 0.25, TAC 4w = 1.83 ± 0.31); (b) extent of the inflammation as expansion of leukocyte infiltration (sham 1w = 1.17 ± 0.31, sham 4w = 1.20 ± 20, TAC 1w = 2 ± 0, TAC 4w = 1.50 ± 0.22); and (c) presence of fibrosis (sham 1w = 0 ± 0, sham 4w = 0 ± 0, TAC 1w = 0.25 ± 0.25, TAC 4w = 0.33 ± 0.21). For details on the histological scoring system please see Materials and Methods section. Data reported are mean ± SEM (sham 1w: n = 6; sham 4w: n = 5; TAC 1w: n = 4; TAC 4w: n = 6). Serum levels of (C) lipopolysaccharide (LPS), (D) tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), (E) interleukin-1 (IL-1) and (F) IL-10 in all experimental groups (sham: n = 4–8; TAC: n = 4–9). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significances were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls multiple comparison post-hoc test (A) or Tukey’s comparison test as appropriate (B–F).
Figure 3Gut microbiota composition after sham or TAC surgery in mice. Gut microbiota differences based on 16S rDNA sequencing at genus (A) and species (B) taxonomic levels were identified using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) combined with effect size (LEfSe) algorithm. In each panel, LDA scores (left) and relative abundance (right) of key phylotypes discriminating sham and TAC bacterial communities are reported (sham n = 8; TAC n = 9). Statistical significances were assessed using LEfSe analysis with alpha values of 0.05 for both Kruskal–Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon tests and a cutoff value of LDA score (log10) above 2.0 (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. correspondent sham).