| Literature DB >> 33795549 |
Hyunmin Ko1, Sangil Min1, Sanghyun Ahn1, Ahram Han1, Jungsun Kim1, Seung-Kee Min1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze changes in stump length over time in patients with saphenous vein incompetence treated with cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Entities:
Keywords: Duplex ultrasonography; Glues; Radiofrequency ablation; Recurrence; Varicose veins
Year: 2021 PMID: 33795549 PMCID: PMC8021488 DOI: 10.5758/vsi.210006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vasc Specialist Int ISSN: 2288-7970
Fig. 1(A) Duplex ultrasonographic image of saphenous vein incompetence with pathologic reflux defined as a retrograde flow of >0.5 second. (B) The great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein diameters were measured at a distance of 2 cm from the saphenofemoral/saphenopopliteal junction. (C) The stump length after the procedure was measured from the junction to the obliterans. FV, femoral vein.
Baseline characteristics of patients (n=71)
| Characteristic | CAC (n=38) | RFA (n=33) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 61.9 (19-86) | 56.9 (25-75) | 0.083 |
| Sex | 0.776 | ||
| Male | 8 (21.1) | 6 (18.2) | |
| Female | 30 (78.9) | 27 (81.8) | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.6 (17.2-32.0) | 24.0 (18.2-30.9) | 0.427 |
| Primary symptom | 0.041 | ||
| Pain | 6 (15.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Heaviness | 4 (10.5) | 9 (27.3) | |
| Swelling | 6 (15.8) | 10 (30.3) | |
| Numbness | 1 (2.6) | 1 (3.0) | |
| Cramps | 12 (31.6) | 5 (15.2) | |
| Engorged veins | 9 (23.7) | 8 (24.2) | |
| CEAP classification | 0.427 | ||
| C2 | 28 (73.7) | 21 (63.6) | |
| C3 | 10 (26.3) | 11 (33.3) | |
| C4 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.0) | |
| VCSS | 4.4±2.7 | 3.9±2.1 | 0.403 |
| AVVQ score | 7.0±5.3 | 7.7±5.4 | 0.566 |
Values are presented as mean (range), number (%), or mean± standard deviation.
CAC, cyanoacrylate closure; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CEAP, clinical–etiological–anatomical–pathophysiologic; VCSS, Venous Clinical Severity Score; AVVQ, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.
Duplex ultrasonographic characteristics of veins (n=97)
| Characteristic | CAC (n=57) | RFA (n=40) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lesion | 0.259 | ||
| GSV | 35 (61.4) | 29 (72.5) | |
| SSV | 22 (38.6) | 11 (27.5) | |
| Diameter (cm) | |||
| GSV | 0.55±0.16 | 0.59±0.19 | 0.419 |
| SSV | 0.42±0.13 | 0.54±0.21 | 0.045 |
| Perforator | 0.510 | ||
| None | 51 (89.5) | 34 (85.0) | |
| ≥1 | 6 (10.5) | 6 (15.0) | |
| Reflux duration (sec) | |||
| GSV | 4.11±2.23 | 4.03±1.80 | 0.874 |
| SSV | 6.46±3.08 | 5.41±2.64 | 0.342 |
Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.
CAC, cyanoacrylate closure; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; GSV, great saphenous vein; SSV, small saphenous vein.
Fig. 2Mean±standard deviation of stump length. (A) The stump length at <1 month was not significantly different between the two treatment groups. However, the stump length at 6 months was significantly longer in the cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) group than in the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group. (B) The changes in stump length at <1 month and 6 months were significant in both groups. (C) The distribution of changes in stump length was wider in the CAC group.
Fig. 3Scatter plot. Correlation between stump length and vein diameter at (A) <1 month and (B) 6 months. (C) Correlation between stump length change and vein diameter. No correlation was observed between stump length and vein diameter. GSV, great saphenous vein; SSV, small saphenous vein.
Fig. 4Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs) and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) scores at follow-up in the cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) groups. The (A) VCSSs and (B) AVVQ scores significantly improved after both procedures without any significant differences between the two groups. However, the RFA group showed significantly higher (C) VCSSs and (D) AVVQ scores than the CAC group at <1 month.