Xin Shelley Wang1, Qiuling Shi2, Tito R Mendoza2, Araceli Garcia-Gonzalez2, Ting-Yu Chen2, Mona Kamal2, Tsun Hsuan Chen2, Cobi Heijnen2, Robert Z Orlowski3, Charles S Cleeland2. 1. Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1445, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. xswang@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1445, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 3. Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma and Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience substantial cancer/treatment-related symptom burden during maintenance therapy. This is a phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial to examine the effect of minocycline for symptom reduction by its potential anti-inflammatory effect. METHODS: Eligible MM patients for maintenance therapy were randomized to receive minocycline (100 mg twice daily) or placebo. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for MM (MDASI-MM) was used to assess multiple symptoms weekly during the trial. Clinician-rated toxicities and blood samples were prospectively collected. The effect size, area under the curve (AUC), and t tests were used to determine the symptom burden between treatment groups and identify the 5 most-severe MDASI-MM symptoms. The longitudinal analysis compared the changes in symptom severity and associated inflammatory markers between groups over time. RESULTS: Sixty-nine evaluable MM patients (33 from the intervention group and 36 from the placebo group) were included. No grade 3+ adverse events related to study medication were noted. The AUCs for the 5 worst MDASI-MM symptoms (fatigue, pain, disturbed sleep numbness/tingling, and drowsiness) were not significantly different between two arms. Regardless of group assignment, pain reduction was positively associated with decreased serum levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor-α receptors 1 and 2 during therapy (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This pPhase II randomized study observed no statistically significant positive signal impact from minocycline on symptom reduction or inflammatory markers during maintenance therapy for MM, although using minocycline was feasible and had a low toxicity profile.
BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience substantial cancer/treatment-related symptom burden during maintenance therapy. This is a phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial to examine the effect of minocycline for symptom reduction by its potential anti-inflammatory effect. METHODS: Eligible MM patients for maintenance therapy were randomized to receive minocycline (100 mg twice daily) or placebo. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for MM (MDASI-MM) was used to assess multiple symptoms weekly during the trial. Clinician-rated toxicities and blood samples were prospectively collected. The effect size, area under the curve (AUC), and t tests were used to determine the symptom burden between treatment groups and identify the 5 most-severe MDASI-MM symptoms. The longitudinal analysis compared the changes in symptom severity and associated inflammatory markers between groups over time. RESULTS: Sixty-nine evaluable MM patients (33 from the intervention group and 36 from the placebo group) were included. No grade 3+ adverse events related to study medication were noted. The AUCs for the 5 worst MDASI-MM symptoms (fatigue, pain, disturbed sleep numbness/tingling, and drowsiness) were not significantly different between two arms. Regardless of group assignment, pain reduction was positively associated with decreased serum levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor-α receptors 1 and 2 during therapy (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This pPhase II randomized study observed no statistically significant positive signal impact from minocycline on symptom reduction or inflammatory markers during maintenance therapy for MM, although using minocycline was feasible and had a low toxicity profile.
Authors: Francesco Sparano; Michele Cavo; Pasquale Niscola; Tommaso Caravita; Fabio Efficace Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrew H Miller; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Julienne E Bower; Lucile Capuron; Michael R Irwin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xin Shelley Wang; Qiuling Shi; Nina D Shah; Cobi J Heijnen; Evan N Cohen; James M Reuben; Robert Z Orlowski; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Valen E Johnson; Loretta A Williams; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Xin Shelley Wang; Qiuling Shi; Loretta A Williams; Nina D Shah; Tito R Mendoza; Evan N Cohen; James M Reuben; Charles S Cleeland; Robert Z Orlowski Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2014-11-20
Authors: Philip L McCarthy; Kouros Owzar; Craig C Hofmeister; David D Hurd; Hani Hassoun; Paul G Richardson; Sergio Giralt; Edward A Stadtmauer; Daniel J Weisdorf; Ravi Vij; Jan S Moreb; Natalie Scott Callander; Koen Van Besien; Teresa Gentile; Luis Isola; Richard T Maziarz; Don A Gabriel; Asad Bashey; Heather Landau; Thomas Martin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Denise Levitan; Brian McClune; Robert Schlossman; Vera Hars; John Postiglione; Chen Jiang; Elizabeth Bennett; Susan Barry; Linda Bressler; Michael Kelly; Michele Seiler; Cara Rosenbaum; Parameswaran Hari; Marcelo C Pasquini; Mary M Horowitz; Thomas C Shea; Steven M Devine; Kenneth C Anderson; Charles Linker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245