| Literature DB >> 33792414 |
Thuy Nguyen1, Ulrike Muench2, Barbara Andraka-Christou3, Kosali Simon4,5, W David Bradford6, Joanne Spetz2.
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between federal regulations, state scope-of-practice regulations on nurse practitioners (NPs), and buprenorphine prescribing patterns using pharmacy claims data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart between January 2015 and September 2018. The county-level proportion of patients filling prescriptions written by NPs was low even after the 2016 Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA), 2.7% in states that did not require physician oversight of NPs, and 1.1% in states that did. While analyses in rural counties showed higher rates of buprenorphine prescriptions written by NPs, rates were still considerably low: 3.7% in states with less restrictive regulations and 1.1% in other states. These results indicate that less restrictive scope-of-practice regulations are associated with greater NP prescribing following CARA. The small magnitude of the changes indicates that federal attempts to expand treatment access through CARA have been limited.Entities:
Keywords: Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act; buprenorphine prescribing; nurse practitioners; scope-of-practice regulations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33792414 PMCID: PMC8594929 DOI: 10.1177/10775587211004311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Care Res Rev ISSN: 1077-5587 Impact factor: 3.929