| Literature DB >> 33791771 |
Tran B Huynh1, Caroline P Groth2, Gurumurthy Ramachandran3, Sudipto Banerjee4, Mark Stenzel5, Aaron Blair6, Dale P Sandler7, Lawrence S Engel7,8, Richard K Kwok7, Patricia A Stewart9.
Abstract
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill response and clean-up (OSRC) involved over 9000 large and small vessels deployed in waters of the Gulf of Mexico across four states (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi). For the GuLF STUDY, we developed exposure estimates of oil-related components for many work groups to capture a wide range of OSRC operations on these vessels, such as supporting the four rig vessels charged with stopping the spill at the wellhead; skimming oil; in situ burning of oil; absorbing and containing oil by boom; and environmental monitoring. Work groups were developed by: (i) vessel activity; (ii) location (area of the Gulf or state); and (iii) time period. Using Bayesian methods, we computed exposure estimates for these groups for: total hydrocarbons measured as total petroleum hydrocarbons (THC), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and n-hexane (BTEX-H). Estimates of the arithmetic means for THC ranged from 0.10 ppm [95% credible interval (CI) 0.04, 0.38 ppm] in time periods 2 and 3 (16 July-30 September 2010) to 15.06 ppm (95% CI 10.74, 22.41 ppm) in time period 1a (22 April-15 May 2010). BTEX-H estimates were substantially lower (in the parts per billion range). Exposure levels generally fell over time and differed statistically by activity, location, and time for some groups. These exposure estimates have been used to develop job-exposure matrices for the GuLF STUDY.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Deepwater Horizon oil spill; Bayesian methods; exposure assessment; job exposure matrix; occupational exposures
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 33791771 PMCID: PMC8989039 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Work Expo Health ISSN: 2398-7308 Impact factor: 2.779