Literature DB >> 33791487

Assessment of serum calcium in -patients referred for suspected lung cancer: A quality -improvement project to enhance patient safety in clinical practice.

Christina Apthorp1, Sagana Kirisnathas2, Nikolaos Stavrakas3, Isuru Warakagoda4, Stephen Crooks5, Jayanta Mukherjee5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypercalcaemia is a serious complication of lung cancer. A quality improvement project (QIP) was designed based on guidance from the American College of Chest Physician and the European Respiratory Society who recommend measuring serum calcium for patients referred with suspected lung cancer.
METHOD: Seventy-two patients were included in the initial data to ascertain the delay between referral to the lung cancer pathway and obtaining serum calcium levels as part of the initial work-up. New data were then collected after each intervention (including presentations at weekly respiratory multidisciplinary team meetings, posters within clinical areas and a hospital trust screensaver) to evaluate the delay.
RESULTS: Initially, 11.1% (n=8) did not have serum calcium measured at any point; two of which had lung cancer (including one metastatic malignancy). Of those who had serum calcium measured, there was a median delay of 13 days between first suspicion and obtaining serum calcium. After all the interventions were put in place, patients had a median of 7 days' delay (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: This QIP design was based on continued feedback to improve the care of patients suspected of lung cancer. Although there was a significant reduction in delays post-intervention, increasing awareness in the community is suggested to maintain these improvements. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; lung; oncology; quality improvement project; respiratory

Year:  2021        PMID: 33791487      PMCID: PMC8004297          DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Healthc J        ISSN: 2514-6645


  5 in total

1.  Epidemiology and treatment costs of bone metastases from lung cancer: a French prospective, observational, multicenter study (GFPC 0601).

Authors:  Chantal Decroisette; Isabelle Monnet; Henri Berard; Gilles Quere; Herve Le Caer; Suzanna Bota; Clarisse Audigier-Valette; Laurence Geriniere; Jean-Marc Vernejoux; Christos Chouaid
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Hypercalcemia associated with cancer.

Authors:  Andrew F Stewart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Executive Summary: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Sandra Zelman Lewis; Rebecca Diekemper; Doreen Addrizzo-Harris; W Michael Alberts
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Clinical and organizational factors in the initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  David E Ost; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung; Lynn T Tanoue; Michael K Gould
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Hypercalcemia in Lung Cancer due to Simultaneously Elevated PTHrP and Ectopic Calcitriol Production: First Case Report.

Authors:  Saed Nemr; Sunitha Alluri; Dhivya Sundaramurthy; Daniel Landry; Gregory Braden
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2017-07-02
  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of interventions to recognise, refer and diagnose patients with lung cancer symptoms.

Authors:  Mohamad M Saab; Megan McCarthy; Michelle O'Driscoll; Laura J Sahm; Patricia Leahy-Warren; Brendan Noonan; Serena FitzGerald; Maria O'Malley; Noreen Lyons; Heather E Burns; Una Kennedy; Áine Lyng; Josephine Hegarty
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.289

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.