David E Ost1, Sai-Ching Jim Yeung2, Lynn T Tanoue3, Michael K Gould4. 1. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX. Electronic address: dost@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX; Department of Endocrine, Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT. 4. Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This guideline is intended to provide an evidence-based approach to the initial evaluation of patients with known or suspected lung cancer. It also includes an assessment of the impact of timeliness of care and multidisciplinary teams on outcome. METHODS: The applicable current medical literature was identified by a computerized search and evaluated using standardized methods. Recommendations were framed using the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Data sources included MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: Initial evaluation should include a thorough history and physical examination; CT imaging; pulmonary function tests; and hemoglobin, electrolyte, liver function, and calcium levels. Additional testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes should be determined on the basis of these results. Paraneoplastic syndromes may have an adverse impact on cancer treatment, so they should be controlled rapidly with the goal of proceeding with definitive cancer treatment in a timely manner. Although the relationship between timeliness of care and survival is difficult to quantify, efforts to deliver timely care are reasonable and should be balanced with the need to attend to other dimensions of health-care quality (eg, safety, effectiveness, efficiency, equality, consistency with patient values and preferences). Quality care will require multiple disciplines. Although it is difficult to assess the impact, we suggest that a multidisciplinary team approach to care be used, particularly for patients requiring multimodality therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer should include a thorough history and physical examination, pulmonary function tests, CT imaging, basic laboratory tests, and selective testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes.
BACKGROUND: This guideline is intended to provide an evidence-based approach to the initial evaluation of patients with known or suspected lung cancer. It also includes an assessment of the impact of timeliness of care and multidisciplinary teams on outcome. METHODS: The applicable current medical literature was identified by a computerized search and evaluated using standardized methods. Recommendations were framed using the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Data sources included MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: Initial evaluation should include a thorough history and physical examination; CT imaging; pulmonary function tests; and hemoglobin, electrolyte, liver function, and calcium levels. Additional testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes should be determined on the basis of these results. Paraneoplastic syndromes may have an adverse impact on cancer treatment, so they should be controlled rapidly with the goal of proceeding with definitive cancer treatment in a timely manner. Although the relationship between timeliness of care and survival is difficult to quantify, efforts to deliver timely care are reasonable and should be balanced with the need to attend to other dimensions of health-care quality (eg, safety, effectiveness, efficiency, equality, consistency with patient values and preferences). Quality care will require multiple disciplines. Although it is difficult to assess the impact, we suggest that a multidisciplinary team approach to care be used, particularly for patients requiring multimodality therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer should include a thorough history and physical examination, pulmonary function tests, CT imaging, basic laboratory tests, and selective testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes.
Authors: Antonio E Martin-Ucar; David A Waller; Jane L Atkins; Daniel Swinson; Ken J O'Byrne; Mick D Peake Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: E H Oldfield; J L Doppman; L K Nieman; G P Chrousos; D L Miller; D A Katz; G B Cutler; D L Loriaux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-09-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: I Elovaara; S Apostolski; P van Doorn; N E Gilhus; A Hietaharju; J Honkaniemi; I N van Schaik; N Scolding; P Soelberg Sørensen; B Udd Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: P V Murray; M E R O'Brien; R Sayer; N Cooke; G Knowles; A C Miller; V Varney; N P Rowell; A R Padhani; D MacVicar; A Norton; S Ashley; I E Smith Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Melissa H Tukey; Jack A Clark; Rendelle Bolton; Michael J Kelley; Christopher G Slatore; David H Au; Renda Soylemez Wiener Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-10
Authors: Mark L Munoz; Noah Lechtzin; Qing Kay Li; KoPen Wang; Lonny B Yarmus; Hans J Lee; David J Feller-Kopman Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Oisin J O'Connell; Francisco A Almeida; Michael J Simoff; Lonny Yarmus; Ray Lazarus; Benjamin Young; Yu Chen; Roy Semaan; Timothy M Saettele; Joseph Cicenia; Harmeet Bedi; Corrine Kliment; Liang Li; Sonali Sethi; Javier Diaz-Mendoza; David Feller-Kopman; Juhee Song; Thomas Gildea; Hans Lee; Horiana B Grosu; Michael Machuzak; Macarena Rodriguez-Vial; George A Eapen; Carlos A Jimenez; Roberto F Casal; David E Ost Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Amelia W Maiga; Stephen A Deppen; Rhonda Pinkerman; Carol Callaway-Lane; Pierre P Massion; Robert S Dittus; Eric S Lambright; Jonathan C Nesbitt; David Baker; Eric L Grogan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Duc Ha; Andrew L Ries; Philippe Montgrain; Florin Vaida; Svetlana Sheinkman; Mark M Fuster Journal: Respir Med Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Francisco A Almeida; Roberto F Casal; Carlos A Jimenez; George A Eapen; Mateen Uzbeck; Mona Sarkiss; David Rice; Rodolfo C Morice; David E Ost Journal: Chest Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 9.410