Literature DB >> 33791365

Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in the Shortest Buccal Bone Marrow Distances of the Mandible on the Coronal Plane.

Chun-Ming Chen1,2, Han-Jen Hsu2, Ping-Ho Chen1, Shih-Wei Liang1, I-Ling Lin3, Kun-Jung Hsu1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between the shortest buccal bone marrow of the ramus and skeletal patterns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using cone-beam computed tomography data (specifically, the A point-nasion-B point (ANB) angle), we divided patients into three groups as follows: skeletal class I (0° < ANB < 4°), class II (ANB: ≥4°), and class III (ANB: ≤0°). Sixteen vertical sections in the coronal plane were taken starting from slice 0 (original intact mandibular canal) anteriorly at 2 mm intervals to slice 15 (30 mm). The thickness of the mandible (M) and shortest buccal bone marrow (SBM) were measured. The data of SBM were divided into two groups (SBM ≥ 1 mm and SBM < 1 mm). For each skeletal pattern, an SBM value < 1 mm was considered to indicate a high possibility of postoperative nerve paresthesia and bad split.
RESULTS: The three skeletal pattern groups also did not significantly differ in their M values for all sections. The mean SBM values of class III (0.91-2.11 mm) at 6-16 mm anterior to the mandibular foramen were significantly smaller than those of class II (1.53-3.17 mm). Comparing the occurrence ratio of SBM < 1 mm, the highest and lowest probabilities in class III (55% and 21.7%, respectively) were significantly larger at 6-20 mm anterior to the mandibular foramen than those in class II (28.3% and 5%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Class III had a significantly shorter SBM distance and higher SBM occurrence probability than class II at the mandibular ramus region, implying that class III participants are more likely than class II participants to have nerve paresthesia and bad split after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Copyright © 2021 Chun-Ming Chen et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33791365      PMCID: PMC7997755          DOI: 10.1155/2021/5586498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  25 in total

1.  Position and course of the mandibular canal in skulls.

Authors:  Ayla Ozturk; Anitha Potluri; Alexandre R Vieira
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-04

2.  Evaluation of the lingual fracture patterns after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy according to Hunsuck/Epker modified by an additional inferior border osteotomy using a burr or ultrasonic device.

Authors:  S C Möhlhenrich; N Ayoub; F Peters; P Winterhalder; A Prescher; F Hölzle; M Wolf; A Modabber
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasonic and Conventional Surgery on the Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

Authors:  Shinya Kokuryo; Manabu Habu; Ryosuke Kita; Takeshi Katsuki; Kazuhiro Tominaga; Izumi Yoshioka
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Relationship Between the Quantity of Nerve Exposure During Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Surgery and Sensitive Recovery.

Authors:  Paolo Gennaro; Maria Elisa Giovannoni; Niccolò Pini; Ikenna Valentine Aboh; Guido Gabriele; Giorgio Iannetti; Flavia Cascino
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 5.  Nerve injury associated with orthognathic surgery. Part 2: inferior alveolar nerve.

Authors:  N M H McLeod; D C Bowe
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  Sagittal split ramus osteotomy-related biomechanical properties.

Authors:  G Rougier; J Boisson; N Thurieau; N Kogane; F Mangione; A Picard; J Dallard; L Cherfa; F Szmytka; N Kadlub
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Neurosensory Disturbances After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Piezoelectric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kristian Rude; Peter Svensson; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Peripheral facial palsy after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: case report.

Authors:  Y Shimada; Y Kawasaki; Y Maruoka
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Y Tsuji; T Muto; J Kawakami; S Takeda
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Clinical Influence of Micromorphological Structure of Dental Implant Bone Drills.

Authors:  Gaetano Marenzi; Josè Camilla Sammartino; Giuseppe Quaremba; Vincenzo Graziano; Andrea El Hassanin; Med Erda Qorri; Gilberto Sammartino; Vincenzo Iorio-Siciliano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.