Shinya Kokuryo1, Manabu Habu2, Ryosuke Kita1, Takeshi Katsuki3, Kazuhiro Tominaga4, Izumi Yoshioka5. 1. Assistant Professor, Division of Oral Medicine, Department of Physical Functions, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan. 2. Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Physical Functions, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan. 3. Visiting Professor, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan. 4. Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Physical Functions, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan. 5. Professor, Division of Oral Medicine, Department of Physical Functions, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan. Electronic address: r13yoshioka@fa.kyu-dent.ac.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: According to the literature, ultrasonic surgery reduces the incidence of neurosensory disturbance (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IFAN) after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ultrasonic surgery and the anatomic position of the IFAN canal on NSD after BSSO. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included skeletal mandibular prognathism cases operated on with an ultrasonic bone scalpel or a reciprocating saw. The primary predictor variable was osteotomy technique (ultrasonic or conventional surgery). The primary outcome variable was NSD. Other variables included age, gender, operator, degree of setback, surgical duration, blood loss, and IFAN position. Comparisons of 2 variables were performed by use of the Student t test or Fisher exact test. A regression model was used to examine the relationship between the presence or absence of NSD and other variables. The level of significance was set at P < .05 for all statistical tests. RESULTS: The ultrasonic group was composed of 35 patients, whereas the conventional group was composed of 32. Three months after surgery, NSD was observed on 16 of 70 sides (22.9%) in the ultrasonic group and 28 of 64 sides (43.8%) in the conventional group; this difference was significant. Furthermore, recovery from NSD at 3 months after BSSO was significantly more common in the ultrasonic group than in the conventional group. In the ultrasonic group, even when the distance from the buccal aspect of the IFAN canal to the outer buccal cortical margin was shorter, NSD of the IFAN was less frequent. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic surgery may be an effective technique to reduce the incidence of NSD after BSSO, and it contributed to recovery from NSD. The use of an ultrasonic device for BSSO is recommended when the distance from the buccal aspect of the IFAN canal to the outer buccal cortical margin is shorter on computed tomography.
PURPOSE: According to the literature, ultrasonic surgery reduces the incidence of neurosensory disturbance (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IFAN) after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ultrasonic surgery and the anatomic position of the IFAN canal on NSD after BSSO. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included skeletal mandibular prognathism cases operated on with an ultrasonic bone scalpel or a reciprocating saw. The primary predictor variable was osteotomy technique (ultrasonic or conventional surgery). The primary outcome variable was NSD. Other variables included age, gender, operator, degree of setback, surgical duration, blood loss, and IFAN position. Comparisons of 2 variables were performed by use of the Student t test or Fisher exact test. A regression model was used to examine the relationship between the presence or absence of NSD and other variables. The level of significance was set at P < .05 for all statistical tests. RESULTS: The ultrasonic group was composed of 35 patients, whereas the conventional group was composed of 32. Three months after surgery, NSD was observed on 16 of 70 sides (22.9%) in the ultrasonic group and 28 of 64 sides (43.8%) in the conventional group; this difference was significant. Furthermore, recovery from NSD at 3 months after BSSO was significantly more common in the ultrasonic group than in the conventional group. In the ultrasonic group, even when the distance from the buccal aspect of the IFAN canal to the outer buccal cortical margin was shorter, NSD of the IFAN was less frequent. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic surgery may be an effective technique to reduce the incidence of NSD after BSSO, and it contributed to recovery from NSD. The use of an ultrasonic device for BSSO is recommended when the distance from the buccal aspect of the IFAN canal to the outer buccal cortical margin is shorter on computed tomography.