| Literature DB >> 33790872 |
Jun Chen1,2,3, Liuting Zhou1,2, Israr Ud Din4, Yasir Arafat1,3,5, Qian Li1,2,3, Juanying Wang1,2, Tingting Wu1,2,6, Linkun Wu1,2,3, Hongmiao Wu1,2,3, Xianjin Qin2,3, Ganga Raj Pokhrel7, Sheng Lin1,2, Wenxiong Lin1,2,3.
Abstract
Under consecutive monoculture, the abundance of pathogenic fungi, such as Fusarium oxysporum in the rhizosphere of Radix pseudostellariae, negatively affects the yield and quality of the plant. Therefore, it is pertinent to explore the role of antagonistic fungi for the management of fungal pathogens such as F. oxysporum. Our PCR-denatured gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) results revealed that the diversity of Trichoderma spp. was significantly declined due to extended monoculture. Similarly, quantitative PCR analysis showed a decline in Trichoderma spp., whereas a significant increase was observed in F. oxysporum. Furthermore, seven Trichoderma isolates from the R. pseudostellariae rhizosphere were identified and evaluated in vitro for their potentiality to antagonize F. oxysporum. The highest and lowest percentage of inhibition (PI) observed among these isolates were 47.91 and 16.67%, respectively. In in vivo assays, the R. pseudostellariae treated with four Trichoderma isolates, having PI > 30%, was used to evaluate the biocontrol efficiency against F. oxysporum in which T. harzianum ZC51 enhanced the growth of the plant without displaying any disease symptoms. Furthermore, the expression of eight defense-related genes of R. pseudostellariae in response to a combination of F. oxysporum and T. harzianum ZC51 treatment was checked, and most of these defense genes were found to be upregulated. In conclusion, this study reveals that the extended monoculture of R. pseudostellariae could alter the Trichoderma communities in the plant rhizosphere leading to relatively low level of antagonistic microorganisms. However, T. harzianum ZC51 could inhibit the pathogenic F. oxysporum and induce the expression of R. pseudostellariae defense genes. Hence, T. harzianum ZC51 improves the plant resistance and reduces the growth inhibitory effect of consecutive monoculture problem.Entities:
Keywords: PCR-DGGE; Radix pseudostellariae; Trichoderma; defense genes; monoculture
Year: 2021 PMID: 33790872 PMCID: PMC8005620 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.579920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) Photographs of R. pseudostellariae under FP, SP, and TP treatments. (B) Yield of R. pseudostellariae under FP, SP, and TP treatments. FP, plot with R. pseudostellariae cultivated in fresh soil; SP, plot with R. pseudostellariae, monocultured for two consecutive years; TP, plot with cultivation of R. pseudostellariae for three consecutive years. Different letters show significant differences according to least significant difference (LSD) (P ≤ 0.05), n = 3.
FIGURE 2Principal component analysis of Trichoderma DGGE. CK, unplanted soil; FP, plot with R. pseudostellariae cultivated in fresh soil; SP, plot with R. pseudostellariae, monocultured for two consecutive years; TP, plot with cultivation of R. pseudostellariae for three consecutive years; DGGE, denatured gradient gel electrophoresis.
Estimated Simpson, Shannon, evenness, and Brillouin’s indices for all the samples using Trichoderma-specific DGGE.
| Treatments | Simpson | Shannon | Evenness | Brillouin |
| CK | 0.9094 + 0.0082a | 3.5867 + 0.0571a | 0.9693 + 0.0154a | 3.5603 + 0.054a |
| FP | 0.9147 + 0.0015a | 3.6275 + 0.011a | 0.9803 + 0.003a | 3.6006 + 0.0094a |
| SP | 0.907 + 0.0016a | 3.5073 + 0.0093b | 0.9783 + 0.0026a | 3.4811 + 0.0084b |
| TP | 0.8835 + 0.0025b | 3.1317 + 0.0144c | 0.9879 + 0.0046a | 3.104 + 0.0136c |
FIGURE 3Quantification of Trichoderma spp. and F. oxysporum in the different plots. CK, control with unplanted soil; FP, plot with R. pseudostellariae cultivated in fresh soil; SP, plot with R. pseudostellariae, monocultured for two consecutive years; TP, plot with cultivation of R. pseudostellariae for three consecutive years. Different letters in the same color show significant differences according to least significant difference (LSD) (P ≤ 0.05); data are means ± standard errors (one-way analysis of variance, n = 4).
In vitro antifungal activity of Trichoderma strains against F. oxysporum.
| Lab. Code | Inhibition in growth assay | Identify | Accession number (ITS) | Accession number ( | Accession number ( |
| ZC5 | 47.91 ± 3.41a | ||||
| ZC51 | 47.66 ± 3.21a | ||||
| ZC4 | 30.66 ± 1.36b | ||||
| CC2-7 | 30.16 ± 11.31b | ||||
| ESK2 | 24.41 ± 4.44bc | ||||
| ZC11 | 23.62 ± 1.67bc | ||||
| ZC13 | 16.67 ± 2.67c |
FIGURE 4Neighbor-joining tree based on sequence analysis of Trichoderma isolates used in this study. Values of the bootstrap analysis (1,000 repetitions) are given at the nodes. (A) ITS; (B) rpb2; (C) tef1. Aspergillus nidulans was the outgroup. Sequences of biocontrol isolates used for this comparison were obtained from GenBank.
FIGURE 5Biocontrol potential of Trichoderma against F. oxysporum. (A) R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum (FOX); (B) R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. asperellum ZC4 (ZC4); (C) R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. harzianum ZC5 (ZC5); (D) R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. harzianum ZC51 (ZC51); (E) R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. hamatum CC2-7 (CC2-7).
FIGURE 6Quantification of Trichoderma spp. and F. oxysporum in the pot experiment. FOX, R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum; ZC4, R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. asperellum ZC4; ZC5, R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. harzianum ZC5; ZC51, R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. harzianum ZC51; CC2-7, R. pseudostellariae was treated with F. oxysporum and T. hamatum CC2-7. Different letters in the same color show significant differences according to least significant difference (LSD) (P ≤ 0.05); data are means ± standard errors (one-way analysis of variance, n = 4).
FIGURE 7Expression of PAL1, PAL3, CH5, CH4, CH1, PR10, PRSTH-21, PR1a, and PR4 genes in comparison with α-actin reference genes. (A) Inoculated with F. oxysporum into tissue-cultured seedlings of R. pseudostellariae; (B) inoculated with T. harzianum ZC51 into tissue-cultured seedlings of R. pseudostellariae; (C) simultaneously inoculated with F. oxysporum and T. harzianum ZC51 into the tissue-cultured seedlings of R. pseudostellariae. Data are means ± standard errors (one-way analysis of variance, n = 4).
Expression of PAL1, PAL3, CH5, CH4, CH1, PR10, PRSTH-21, PR1a, and PR4 genes in comparison with α-actin reference genes.
| Treatments | TF | ||
| 2.3231 ± 0.1857c | 3.4471 ± 0.3011b | 5.5851 ± 0.7776a | |
| 0.1622 ± 0.0157a | 0.1699 ± 0.0257a | 0.0929 ± 0.026b | |
| 0.6188 ± 0.2544b | 9.8098 ± 6.8382a | 8.9884 ± 0.6374a | |
| 1.0905 ± 0.0894b | 18.8246 ± 3.3248a | 21.0104 ± 2.4285a | |
| 0.0565 ± 0.0014c | 0.471 ± 0.0095b | 1.3374 ± 0.1003a | |
| 0.1049 ± 0.0136b | 2.0501 ± 0.2914b | 27.8775 ± 2.9425a | |
| 0.2035 ± 0.0206c | 3.872 ± 0.1593a | 2.5438 ± 0.5835b | |
| 0.1075 ± 0.005c | 1.8026 ± 0.1541a | 1.1476 ± 0.1243b | |
| 0.1188 ± 0.021c | 2.2681 ± 0.3655a | 1.3469 ± 0.2162b |