| Literature DB >> 33790733 |
Toru Hosoi1, Yosuke Yamawaki2,3, Hitomi Kimura4, Shoko Honda4, Koichiro Ozawa4.
Abstract
Myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) is an adapter protein of the toll-like receptor (TLR) family that regulates innate immune function. Here, we identified a novel role of MyD88 in regulating stress response. MyD88 deficiency decreased immobility time in the forced swim test without affecting locomotor activity in mice. Immobilization stress-induced production of serum corticosterone was also completely inhibited by MyD88 deficiency. Stress induced decrease in glucocorticoid receptor in the hippocampus. On the other hand, stress exposure in MyD88 deficient mice did not cause decrease in its level in the hippocampus. Furthermore, immobilization stress-induced reduction of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in the hippocampus was ameliorated by MyD88 deficiency. These results suggest that MyD88 deficiency attenuates depression-like behavior by regulating corticosterone and BDNF levels. Overall, these results indicate the key role of MyD88 in regulating stress response in mice.Entities:
Keywords: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; corticosterone; depression; immobilization stress; myeloid differentiation primary response 88
Year: 2021 PMID: 33790733 PMCID: PMC8006405 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.621446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1MyD88 deficiency decreased immobility time without affecting locomotor activity in the forced swim test. (A) Wild-type (WT) and MyD88-deficient (MyD88 deficient) mice were forced to swim for 6 min, and the immobility time was calculated. Values are presented as means ± SD. Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05; (WT: n = 12; MyD88 deficient: n = 12). (B) MyD88 deficiency did not affect locomotor activity. Locomotor activities (6 min) were measured for each genotype (WT and MyD88 deficient mice). Values are presented as means ± SD; Student’s t-test: not significance; (WT: n = 10; MyD88 deficient: n = 9).
FIGURE 2Corticosterone and glucocorticoid receptor levels in MyD88-deficient mice exposed to immobilization stress. (A) Immobilization stress-induced production of corticosterone was impaired in MyD88-deficient mice. Serum corticosterone levels in wild-type (WT) and MyD88-deficient (MyD88 deficient) mice were measured 8 h after the immobilization stress. Values are presented as means ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc comparison was performed. The results of two-way ANOVA were as follows: immobilization: F(1) = 37.990 p < 0.0001; genotype: F(1) = 32.550, p < 0.0001; immobilization × genotype interaction: F(1) = 17.839, p = 0.0002. The result of post hoc test were as follows: ***p < 0.001, WT-cont vs. WT-IMO; WT-IMO vs. MyD88 deficient-cont; WT-IMO vs. MyD88 deficient-IMO; (WT-cont: n = 9; WT-IMO: n = 9; MyD88 deficient-cont: n = 8, MyD88 deficient-IMO: n = 9). (B) Expression levels of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA in MyD88-deficient mice did not change after exposure to immobilization stress. Hippocampus samples were obtained 8 h after exposure to immobilization stress (IMO) and subjected to real-time PCR analysis. Values are presented the ratio to WT control group as means ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc comparison was performed. The results of two-way ANOVA were as follows: immobilization: F(1) = 2.801, p = 0.106; genotype: F(1) = 1.154, p = 0.293; immobilization × genotype interaction: F(1) = 3.595, p = 0.069. The result of post hoc test were as follows: *p = 0.023, WT-cont vs. WT-IMO; (WT-cont: n = 10; WT-IMO: n = 10; MyD88 deficient-cont: n = 5, MyD88 deficient-IMO: n = 5).
FIGURE 3BDNF levels in MyD88-deficient mice exposed to immobilization stress. Immobilization stress-induced reduction in BDNF mRNA level was ameliorated in MyD88-deficient mice. Hippocampus samples were obtained 8 h after exposure to immobilization stress and subjected to real-time PCR analysis. Values are presented the ratio to WT control group as means ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc comparison was performed. The results of two-way ANOVA were as follows: immobilization: F(1) = 0.766, p = 0.389; genotype: F(1) = 5.7515, p = 0.024; immobilization × genotype interaction: F(1) = 5.391, p = 0.028. The result of post hoc test were as follows: *p = 0.047, WT-cont vs. WT-IMO, *p = 0.128, WT-cont vs. deficient-IMO (WT-cont: n = 10; WT-IMO: n = 10; MyD88 deficient-cont: n = 5, MyD88 deficient-IMO: n = 5).