Literature DB >> 33788259

A transformation-free linear regression for compositional outcomes and predictors.

Jacob Fiksel1, Scott Zeger1, Abhirup Datta1.   

Abstract

Compositional data are common in many fields, both as outcomes and predictor variables. The inventory of models for the case when both the outcome and predictor variables are compositional is limited, and the existing models are often difficult to interpret in the compositional space, due to their use of complex log-ratio transformations. We develop a transformation-free linear regression model where the expected value of the compositional outcome is expressed as a single Markov transition from the compositional predictor. Our approach is based on estimating equations thereby not requiring complete specification of data likelihood and is robust to different data-generating mechanisms. Our model is simple to interpret, allows for 0s and 1s in both the compositional outcome and covariates, and subsumes several interesting subcases of interest. We also develop permutation tests for linear independence and equality of effect sizes of two components of the predictor. Finally, we show that despite its simplicity, our model accurately captures the relationship between compositional data using two datasets from education and medical research.
© 2021 The Authors. Biometrics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kullback-Leibler distance loss function; compositional data; estimating equation; expectation-maximization algorithm; transformation-free

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33788259     DOI: 10.1111/biom.13465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   1.701


  2 in total

1.  Regularized regression on compositional trees with application to MRI analysis.

Authors:  Bingkai Wang; Brian S Caffo; Xi Luo; Chin-Fu Liu; Andreia V Faria; Michael I Miller; Yi Zhao
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 1.680

2.  Differences in visual field loss pattern when transitioning from SITA standard to SITA faster.

Authors:  Christopher T Le; Jacob Fiksel; Pradeep Ramulu; Jithin Yohannan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.