Yu Sang1, Kaimin Mao2, Ming Cao1, Xiaofen Wu1, Lei Ruan1, Cuntai Zhang1. 1. Department of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, NHC Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Arterial stiffness may be an intermediary biological pathway involved in the association between cardiovascular health (CVH) and cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CVH on progression of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) over approximately 4 years. METHODS: We included 1315 cardiovascular disease-free adults (49±12 years) who had two checkups from 2010 to 2019. CVH metrics (current smoking, body mass index, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose) were assessed at baseline, and the number of ideal CVH metrics and CVH score were calculated. Additionally, baPWV was examined at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: Median baPWV increased from 1340 cm/s to 1400 cm/s, with an average annual change in baPWV of 15 cm/s. More ideal CVH metrics and a higher CVH score were associated with lower baseline and follow-up baPWV, and the annual change in baPWV, even after adjustment for confounding variables. Associations between CVH parameters and baseline and follow-up baPWV remained robust in different sex and age subgroups, but they were only able to predict the annual change in baPWV in men and individuals older than 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the benefit of a better baseline CVH profile for progression of arterial stiffness.
OBJECTIVE: Arterial stiffness may be an intermediary biological pathway involved in the association between cardiovascular health (CVH) and cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CVH on progression of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) over approximately 4 years. METHODS: We included 1315 cardiovascular disease-free adults (49±12 years) who had two checkups from 2010 to 2019. CVH metrics (current smoking, body mass index, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose) were assessed at baseline, and the number of ideal CVH metrics and CVH score were calculated. Additionally, baPWV was examined at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: Median baPWV increased from 1340 cm/s to 1400 cm/s, with an average annual change in baPWV of 15 cm/s. More ideal CVH metrics and a higher CVH score were associated with lower baseline and follow-up baPWV, and the annual change in baPWV, even after adjustment for confounding variables. Associations between CVH parameters and baseline and follow-up baPWV remained robust in different sex and age subgroups, but they were only able to predict the annual change in baPWV in men and individuals older than 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the benefit of a better baseline CVH profile for progression of arterial stiffness.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiovascular health; arterial stiffness; blood pressure; body mass index; cholesterol; fasting plasma glucose; pulse wave velocity; risk factor; smoking
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular
disease, is the leading cause of death in China. Additionally, China is one of the
countries that have the highest burden of CVD internationally.[1,2] The CVD epidemic can be
curtailed by identification and management of risk factors for CVD. Communicating
this risk in a more understandable and easier manner will have a greater emotional
impact and be able to motivate a population to make lifestyle changes.[3] To reduce CVDmortality and the prevalence of risk factors, the American
Heart Association proposed a simple and useful concept called cardiovascular health (CVH).[4] This new concept developed definitions of “ideal”, “intermediate”, and “poor”
CVH on the basis of seven health behaviors (current smoking, body mass index [BMI],
physical activity, and healthy diet score) and health factors (total cholesterol,
blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose[FPG]).[4] Previous evidence has suggested that the presence of more ideal CVH metrics
is associated with a lower incidence and mortality of CVD,[5-10] but the mechanisms underlying
this association warrant investigation.Vascular structure and function become damaged over time. Vascular aging provides a
more comprehensive explanation for development of CVD events, especially for those
with little atherosclerosis.[11] Arterial stiffness is a major age-related, arterial, degenerative phenotype
and is considered a physiological method for quantifying vascular aging.[12-15] Accumulating studies have
shown that arterial stiffness is an independent predictor for CVD events and
deaths.[16,17] Therefore, arterial stiffness has been proposed as a surrogate
endpoint for CVD. We hypothesized that the protective effects of CVH on the
incidence and mortality of CVD are mediated by the favorable effects of CVH on
arterial stiffness.Many studies have reported the association between CVD risk factors and arterial
stiffness, but evidence of their joint effect on arterial stiffness is lacking,
particularly in longitudinal studies. Limited prospective studies have investigated
the association between CVH and arterial stiffness.[18-23] However, these studies were
based on measurement of arterial stiffness at a single time point at follow-up and
ignored the change in arterial stiffness during the study period. Therefore, this
study aimed to examine the predictive value of the baseline CVH profile in relation
to the progression rate of arterial stiffness over 4.2 years of follow-up.
Patients and methods
Subjects
This retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted at the physical examination
center of the Geriatric Department of Tongji Hospital and was approved by the
medical ethics committee of Tongji Hospital (TJ-IRB20190410). We screened 21,627
brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) database records from November 2010
to October 2019. A total of 1564 individuals had a second baPWV measurement
after a delay of more than 3 years, and their second baPWV measurement depended
on their own personal arrangements. The exclusion criteria were as follows: age
younger than 18 years, coronary disease (n = 60), stroke (n = 4), obvious
arrhythmia (persistent atrial fibrillation, frequent premature beats, or wearing
a pacemaker) (n = 33), cardiomyopathy (n = 2), valvular heart disease, chronic
liver or kidney disease (n = 8), cancer (n = 36), ankle–brachial index < 0.9
(n = 3), and missing data (n = 103). Verbal informed consent was obtained from
all participants.
Baseline clinical characteristics
When the subjects visited the physical examination center, trained personnel
conducted standardized in-person interviews with the subjects to collect
information regarding age, sex, current smoking and alcohol drinking status,
medical history, and medication use. Anthropometric indices, including height
and weight, were measured. BMI was computed as the weight in kilograms divided
by the square of the height in meters. Blood pressure and heart rate were
measured using an Omron sphygmomanometer (Omron Corporation, Kyoto, Japan).
Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate used in the
analysis were calculated as the average of three measured values. Fasting venous
blood samples were collected and sent to the hospital’s clinical chemistry
laboratory. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), FPG, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c),
creatinine, and uric acid levels were measured using standard certified
assays.
Number of ideal CVH metrics and CVH score at baseline
In the present study, we included five CVH metrics (current smoking, BMI, total
cholesterol, blood pressure, and FPG). Each metric was categorized as ideal,
intermediate, or poor according to American Heart Association criteria (Table 1). For each
participant, the number of ideal CVH metrics was calculated (total scale: 0–5
points). We also constructed a CVH score on the basis of the five CVH metrics
(poor = 0 points; intermediate = 1 point; ideal = 2 points; total scale: 0–10
points).[5,24]
Table 1.
Distribution of individual baseline CVH metrics.
Metrics
Definition*
Total sample (n = 1315)
Current smoking
Ideal
Never or quit for > 12 months
943 (71.7)
Intermediate
Former for ≤ 12 months
48 (3.7)
Poor
Yes
324 (24.6)
BMI (kg/m2)
Ideal
< 25
716 (54.4)
Intermediate
25–29.9
551 (41.9)
Poor
≥ 30
48 (3.7)
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
Ideal
< 5.18
893 (67.9)
Intermediate
5.18–6.20 or treated to goal
345 (26.2)
Poor
≥ 6.21
77 (5.9)
Blood pressure
Ideal
< 120/< 80 mmHg
511 (38.9)
Intermediate
SBP of 120–139, DBP of 80–89 mmHg, or treated to goal
447 (34.0)
Poor
SBP ≥ 140 or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg
357 (27.1)
FPG (mmol/L)
Ideal
< 5.56
1032 (78.5)
Intermediate
5.56–6.99 or treated to goal
215 (16.3)
Poor
≥ 7.00
68 (5.2)
Data are shown as number (%).
CVH, cardiovascular health; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood
pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting plasma
glucose.
*According to reference 4.
Distribution of individual baseline CVH metrics.Data are shown as number (%).CVH, cardiovascular health; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood
pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting plasma
glucose.*According to reference 4.
Arterial stiffness at baseline and follow-up
The ankle–brachial index and baPWV were measured using the Vascular Profiler
BP-203RPEIII system (Omron Corporation). Trained technicians placed the pressure
cuffs on the subjects (i.e., one on the upper part of each arm and one on each
ankle). The subjects were then examined after 10 minutes of rest in the supine
position. The device simultaneously recorded the bilateral pulse waves of the
brachial and posterior tibial arteries using an oscillometric method. baPWV was
calculated as the ratio of the traveled distance, which was automatically
estimated from the body height divided by the transit time of the pulse wave
between the brachial and posterior tibial arteries. The annual change in baPWV
was calculated by dividing the difference between baseline and follow-up baPWV
in cm/s by the interval time in years.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using R version 3.6.2 and R Studio version 1.2.5033 (https://www.R-project.org/). Continuous variables are presented
as the mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), as appropriate
for the distribution. Categorical variables are shown as counts (%).
Log-transformation was conducted to achieve normality. We compared the baseline
variables between groups using analysis of variance or the chi-square test
accordingly. We used univariate linear regression or the Mantel–Haenszel test to
calculate the p value for trend. Paired t-tests were used to determine if baPWV
changed over the follow-up period. Crude and multivariable linear regression
models were developed to estimate βs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for
baseline baPWV, follow-up baPWV, and the annual change in baPWV associated with
CVH. Age and sex were controlled for in model 1. Further adjustments were made
for heart rate, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HbA1c, current alcohol drinking
status, creatinine, and uric acid in model 2. Baseline baPWV was adjusted in all
models using the annual change in baPWV as the dependent variable. We conducted
subgroup analyses to examine whether the effects of CVH differed with sex (male
vs female) or age (< 50 years vs > 50 years). Two-tailed p
values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Baseline characteristics and the CVH profile
A total of 1315 subjects were included in this study. The proportions of
participants in the total sample who had ideal levels of individual CVH metrics
at baseline were as follows: current smoking, 71.7%; BMI, 54.4%; total
cholesterol, 67.9%; blood pressure, 38.9%; and FPG, 78.5% (Table 1). Among the
total sample, 194 (14.8%) subjects had five ideal CVH metrics (Figure 1). The median
number of ideal CVH metrics was 3 points and the median CVH score was 8
points.
Figure 1.
Histograms of the number of ideal CVH metrics and the CVH score at
baseline.
CVH, cardiovascular health.
Histograms of the number of ideal CVH metrics and the CVH score at
baseline.CVH, cardiovascular health.Table 2 shows the
baseline demographic and metabolic characteristics of the 1315 participants free
of CVD, stratified by the number of ideal CVH metrics. The subjects’ mean age
was 49 ± 12 years, and 1005 (76.4%) were men and 310 (23.6%) were women. The
presence of more ideal CVH metrics was significantly associated with a younger
age, female sex, non-smokers, non-alcohol drinkers, lower BMI, blood pressure,
heart rate, total cholesterol levels, LDL-C levels, triglyceride levels, FBG
levels, HbA1c levels, creatinine levels, and uric acid levels, and higher HDL-C
levels (all p < 0.001). Therefore, CVD risk factors (older age, obesity,
smoking, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and elevated glucose) were clustered
together in subjects with less ideal CVH metrics.
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics and progression of arterial stiffness of the
study sample in relation to CVH categories.
Variables
All participants (n = 1315)
Number of ideal CVH metrics
p
p for trend
Low, 0–1 (n = 138)
Medium, 2–3 (n = 655)
High, 4–5 (n = 522)
Age, years
49 ± 12
52 ± 9
51 ± 11
46 ± 12
<0.001
<0.001
Male sex
1005 (76.4%)
134 (97.1%)
572 (87.3%)
299 (57.3%)
<0.001
<0.001
BMI, kg/m2
24.6 ± 3.0
27.4 ± 2.1
25.6 ± 2.6
22.5 ± 2.4
<0.001
<0.001
SBP, mmHg
123 ± 15
131 ± 12
128 ± 14
114 ± 13
<0.001
<0.001
DBP, mmHg
75± 11
82 ± 9
79 ± 9
69 ± 10
<0.001
<0.001
Heart rate, beats/minute
67 ± 10
69 ± 10
67 ± 10
66 ± 10
0.03
0.02
Hypertension
438 (33.3%)
80 (58.0%)
296 (45.2%)
62 (11.9%)
<0.001
<0.001
Antihypertensive medication
303 (23.0%)
58 (42.0%)
206 (31.5%)
39 (7.5%)
<0.001
<0.001
Total cholesterol, mmol/L
4.71 ± 0.86
5.18 ± 0.97
4.82 ± 0.87
4.45 ± 0.71
<0.001
<0.001
LDL-C, mmol/L
2.86 ± 0.73
3.08 ± 0.85
2.95 ± 0.75
2.69 ± 0.63
<0.001
<0.001
HDL-C, mmol/L
1.23 ± 0.30
1.12 ± 0.23
1.17 ± 0.28
1.32 ± 0.31
<0.001
<0.001
Triglycerides, mmol/L
1.30 (1.01)
2.06 (1.47)
1.49 (1.08)
0.98 (0.65)
<0.001
<0.001
Lipid-lowering medication
66 (5.0%)
19 (13.8%)
45 (6.9%)
2 (0.4%)
<0.001
<0.001
FPG, mmol/L
5.18 ± 0.91
6.26 ± 1.45
5.19 ± 0.75
4.89 ± 0.66
<0.001
<0.001
HbA1c, %
5.7 ± 0.5
6.2 ± 0.8
5.7 ± 0.4
5.5 ± 0.4
<0.001
<0.001
Diabetes mellitus
108 (8.2%)
50 (36.2%)
53 (8.1%)
5 (1.0%)
<0.001
<0.001
Diabetes medication
47 (3.6%)
27 (19.6%)
19 (2.9%)
1 (0.2%)
<0.001
<0.001
Current smoking
<0.001
<0.001
Yes
324 (24.6%)
84 (60.9%)
197 (30.1%)
43 (8.2%)
Former for ≤ 12 months
48 (3.7%)
13 (9.4%)
24 (3.7%)
11 (2.1%)
Never or quit for >12 months
943 (71.7%)
41 (29.7%)
434 (66.3%)
468 (89.7%)
Current alcohol drinking
<0.001
<0.001
Yes
247 (18.8%)
57 (41.3%)
158 (24.1%)
32 (6.1%)
Former for ≤ 12 months
400 (30.4%)
41 (29.7%)
210 (32.1%)
149 (28.5%)
Never or quit for >12 months
668 (50.8%)
40 (29.0%)
287 (43.8%)
341 (65.3%)
Creatinine, µmol/L
75.6 ± 15.2
77.2 ± 11.7
79.0 ± 14.8
70.9 ± 15.4
<0.001
<0.001
Uric acid, µmol/L
357 ± 90
398 ± 86
380 ± 85
317 ± 81
<0.001
<0.001
Number of ideal CVH metrics
3 (2)
1 (0)
3 (1)
4 (1)
<0.001
<0.001
CVH score
8 (3)
4 (2)
7 (2)
9 (1)
<0.001
<0.001
ABI
1.11 ± 0.08
1.12 ± 0.08
1.12 ± 0.08
1.09 ± 0.08
<0.001
<0.001
Baseline baPWV, cm/s
1340 (321)
1430 (214)
1390 (322)
1220 (242)
<0.001
<0.001
Follow-up baPWV, cm/s
1400 (336)
1500 (319)
1470 (352)
1290 (274)
<0.001
<0.001
Annual change in baPWV, cm/s per year
15.0 (43.3)
20.4 (50.5)
15.0 (45.9)
14.5 (39.5)
0.17
0.93
Data are mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or
number (%).
Baseline characteristics and progression of arterial stiffness of the
study sample in relation to CVH categories.Data are mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or
number (%).CVH, cardiovascular health; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood
pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LDL-C, low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated
hemoglobin; ABI, ankle–brachial index; baPWV, brachial–ankle pulse
wave velocity.
Progression of arterial stiffness over the follow-up period
The median duration of follow-up was 4.2 years (interquartile range: 2.8 years).
There was a significant increase in arterial stiffness, as evaluated by baPWV
from baseline to follow-up (p < 0.001), with an annual change in baPWV of
15 cm/s (Table 2).
Participants with four to five ideal CVH metrics had significantly lower
baseline and follow-up baPWV compared with those with a low or medium amount of
ideal CVH metrics (both p < 0.001, Figure 2). The annual change in baPWV
also appeared to be lower in individuals with a high number of ideal CVH
metrics, but this was not significant. Although grouping may help data
presentation in tables, categorization leads to loss of information and the
statistical power to detect a relation between variables is reduced.[25]
Figure 2.
Boxplots of baseline baPWV, follow-up baPWV, and the annual change in
baPWV in relation to baseline CVH categories. Horizontal lines indicate
the median value and boxes contain 50% of the data.
Boxplots of baseline baPWV, follow-up baPWV, and the annual change in
baPWV in relation to baseline CVH categories. Horizontal lines indicate
the median value and boxes contain 50% of the data.CVH, cardiovascular health; baPWV, brachial–ankle pulse wave
velocity.
Association between CVH and progression of arterial stiffness
Figures 3 and 4 present the results of
crude and multiple linear regression analyses using the number of ideal CVH
metrics or the CVH score as the independent variable, respectively. The presence
of more ideal CVH metrics and a higher CVH score were independently associated
with lower baseline baPWV, follow-up baPWV, and the annual change in baPWV.
Every additional ideal CVH metric corresponded to a 36 cm/s (95% CI: 23–48;
p < 0.001) decrease in baseline baPWV, a 38 cm/s (95% CI: 25–50;
p < 0.001) decrease in follow-up baPWV, and a 3.29 cm/s (95% CI: 0.85–5.72;
p = 0.008) decrease in the annual change in baPWV, after adjustment for all
confounding variables. Every increase in the CVH score by 1 point corresponded
to a 35 cm/s (95% CI: 26–43; p < 0.001) decrease in baseline baPWV, a 31 cm/s
(95% CI: 23–39; p < 0.001) decrease in follow-up baPWV, and a 2.13 cm/s (95%
CI: 0.46–3.80; p = 0.01) decrease in the annual change in baPWV, after
adjustment for all confounding variables.
Figure 3.
Associations between the baseline number of ideal cardiovascular health
metrics and progression of arterial stiffness in different study
population subgroups. β represents the change in the dependent variable
(cm/s for baseline baPWV and follow-up baPWV, or cm/s/year for the
annual change in baPWV) for a 1 point increase in the baseline number of
ideal cardiovascular health metrics. Model 1: adjusted for baseline age
and sex; model 2: adjusted for baseline age, sex, heart rate,
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol, triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin, current alcohol
drinking status, creatinine, and uric acid. *Adjusted for the same
independent parameters as those in models 1 and 2, except for sex.
†Adjusted for baseline baPWV plus the same independent parameters as
those in models 1 and 2
Associations between the baseline CVH score and progression of arterial
stiffness in different study population subgroups. β represents the
change in the dependent variable (cm/s for baseline baPWV and follow-up
baPWV, or cm/s/year for the annual change in baPWV) for a 1 point
increase in the CVH score. Model 1: adjusted for baseline age and sex;
model 2: adjusted for baseline age, sex, heart rate, low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,
triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin, current alcohol drinking status,
creatinine, and uric acid. *Adjusted for the same independent parameters
as those in models 1 and 2, except for sex. †Adjusted for baseline baPWV
plus the same independent parameters as those in models 1 and 2 baPWV,
brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity; CI, confidence interval.
Associations between the baseline number of ideal cardiovascular health
metrics and progression of arterial stiffness in different study
population subgroups. β represents the change in the dependent variable
(cm/s for baseline baPWV and follow-up baPWV, or cm/s/year for the
annual change in baPWV) for a 1 point increase in the baseline number of
ideal cardiovascular health metrics. Model 1: adjusted for baseline age
and sex; model 2: adjusted for baseline age, sex, heart rate,
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol, triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin, current alcohol
drinking status, creatinine, and uric acid. *Adjusted for the same
independent parameters as those in models 1 and 2, except for sex.
†Adjusted for baseline baPWV plus the same independent parameters as
those in models 1 and 2baPWV, brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity; CI, confidence interval.Associations between the baseline CVH score and progression of arterial
stiffness in different study population subgroups. β represents the
change in the dependent variable (cm/s for baseline baPWV and follow-up
baPWV, or cm/s/year for the annual change in baPWV) for a 1 point
increase in the CVH score. Model 1: adjusted for baseline age and sex;
model 2: adjusted for baseline age, sex, heart rate, low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,
triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin, current alcohol drinking status,
creatinine, and uric acid. *Adjusted for the same independent parameters
as those in models 1 and 2, except for sex. †Adjusted for baseline baPWV
plus the same independent parameters as those in models 1 and 2 baPWV,
brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity; CI, confidence interval.In subgroup analysis, the effects of the number of ideal CVH metrics and the CVH
score on arterial stiffness were similar (Figures 3 and 4). The associations between CVH
parameters and baseline and follow-up baPWV remained robust in different sex and
age subgroups. However, in subgroup analysis, CVH parameters were only able to
predict the annual change in baPWV change in men and individuals older than 50
years, after adjustment for all confounding variables (all p < 0.05).
Discussion
Arterial aging-associated structural and functional changes are accelerated by
cardiovascular risk factors, such as adiposity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes.[26] Arterial stiffness is considered a cumulative measure of the damaging effects
of these risk factors on the arterial wall with aging.[27] We confirmed the joint effect of cardiovascular risk factors on arterial
stiffness in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. The presence of more ideal
CVH metrics and a higher CVH score at baseline were not only associated with
baseline baPWV in cross-sectional analysis, but also independently predicted
follow-up baPWV and the annual change in baPWV. The significant and inverse
relationship between CVH status and arterial stiffness remained robust in different
subgroups, especially in men and individuals older than 50 years. These findings may
provide some evidence of the intermediary biological pathways through which ideal
CVH results in a lower incidence and mortality of CVD.In line with our study, three other cross-sectional studies also showed that ideal
CVH had an independent favorable effect on vascular elasticity, as measured by baPWV
or carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) in Chinese, Spanish, and Australian
adults.[28-30] Furthermore,
each additional point in the ideal CVH score was also associated with slower cfPWV
in a population of Australian children aged 11 to 12 years.[30] This previous finding suggested the importance of interventions to improve
CVH behavior and factors at a young age.Although previous longitudinal studies examined the relationship between CVH and
arterial stiffness, they only had one measurement of arterial stiffness at follow-up
and lacked baseline baPWV values.[18-23] Therefore, these studies may
have been insufficient to accurately assess the change in arterial stiffness. An
increasing number of ideal CVH metrics at baseline were significantly associated
with decreased follow-up cfPWV in American adolescents with type 1 diabetes and
American adults in the SEARCH CVD study[19] and the Maine–Syracuse Longitudinal Study.[18] This finding is in concordance with our study, which showed that a higher
baseline number of ideal CVH metrics and CVH score independently predicted a lower
baPWV after 4.2 years. Additionally, this relationship remained robust across all
different sex and age subgroups. Previous studies aimed to examine the association
between long-term patterns in the CVH trajectory and follow-up arterial
stiffness.[20-23] These studies showed that
attainment of ideal CVH typically declined with age, and higher long-term attainment
of ideal CVH and improvement in the CVH profile throughout life were associated with
low baPWV or cfPWV at follow-up.None of the above-mentioned studies took into account the long-term change in
arterial stiffness. In the current study, we calculated the annual change in baPWV
to overcome the limitations of previous studies. We found that the presence of more
ideal CVH metrics predicted a lower progression rate of baPWV in men and individuals
older than 50 years, even after adjustment for all confounding factors. This
conclusion is consistent with two other Chinese studies, and both of them only
included middle-aged and elderly adults.[31,32] In contrast to our findings,
Wang et al.[32] showed that the dose–response effect of ideal CVH on elevated baPWV was
attenuated in men and elderly individuals in subgroup analysis. Therefore, because
of this discrepancy between studies, further studies are required.Some limitations of our study warrant consideration. First, the proposed CVH metrics
include seven components. However, data on physical activity and diet were not
available in the present study, and this might have decreased the external validity
of the study. A similar limitation can be found in other studies.[33,34] However,
notably, physical activity and diet pattern might also have had effects on
progression of arterial stiffness.[35-38] This might lead to
underestimation of the effect of CVH on arterial stiffness. Second, we only included
baseline CVH status. Therefore, we were not able to quantify the effects of changes
in the CVH profile on arterial stiffness. Additionally, selection bias might have
occurred because whether individuals came for a follow-up visit and had a second
baPWV measurement depended on their own personal arrangements. Finally, this study
was conducted at a single center, resulting in a sample that comprised more men than
women. Further large, community-based research is still required.In conclusion, our study shows that there is a significant and inverse association
between baseline CVH status and progression of arterial stiffness in 4.2 years,
especially in men and individuals older than 50 years. This finding indicates that
optimizing CVH metrics could delay the onset and progression of arterial stiffness
and it might be a potential intervention to reduce the burden of CVD. Assessment of
the CVH profile at the population level should be advocated in China.
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Yuling Hong; Darwin Labarthe; Dariush Mozaffarian; Lawrence J Appel; Linda Van Horn; Kurt Greenlund; Stephen Daniels; Graham Nichol; Gordon F Tomaselli; Donna K Arnett; Gregg C Fonarow; P Michael Ho; Michael S Lauer; Frederick A Masoudi; Rose Marie Robertson; Véronique Roger; Lee H Schwamm; Paul Sorlie; Clyde W Yancy; Wayne D Rosamond Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vanessa Xanthakis; Danielle M Enserro; Joanne M Murabito; Joseph F Polak; Kai C Wollert; James L Januzzi; Thomas J Wang; Geoffrey Tofler; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Long Wang; Jing Ya Niu; Zhi Yun Zhao; Mian Li; Min Xu; Jie Li Lu; Tian Ge Wang; Yu Hong Chen; Shuang Yuan Wang; Meng Dai; Lin Li; Shan Shan Liu; Wei Qing Wang; Yu Xu; Yu Fang Bi Journal: Biomed Environ Sci Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Marta Gomez-Sanchez; Leticia Gomez-Sanchez; Maria C Patino-Alonso; Pedro G Cunha; Jose I Recio-Rodriguez; Rosario Alonso-Dominguez; Natalia Sanchez-Aguadero; Emiliano Rodriguez-Sanchez; Jose A Maderuelo-Fernandez; Luis Garcia-Ortiz; Manuel A Gomez-Marcos Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Amy Jennings; Agnes M Berendsen; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Edith J M Feskens; Anna Brzozowska; Ewa Sicinska; Barbara Pietruszka; Nathalie Meunier; Elodie Caumon; Corinne Malpuech-Brugère; Aurelia Santoro; Rita Ostan; Claudio Franceschi; Rachel Gillings; Colette M O' Neill; Sue J Fairweather-Tait; Anne-Marie Minihane; Aedín Cassidy Journal: Hypertension Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Ana María Armas-Padrón; Domingo Hernández; Miriam Sicilia-Sosvilla; Sergio Rodríguez-Bello; María Dolores López-Carmona; Pedro Ruiz-Esteban Journal: BMC Prim Care Date: 2022-09-09