Literature DB >> 33786505

US Women's Perceptions and Acceptance of New Reproductive Health Technologies.

Amber K Worthington1,2, Erin E Burke2, Talia N Shirazi2, Carly Leahy2.   

Abstract

Background: Women have faced persistent problems accessing reproductive health care. New applications of health technologies to reproductive health, specifically online fertility specialist consultations and reproductive hormone self-collection tests (SCTs), present unique opportunities to overcome these issues. This article uses the technology acceptance model to examine factors that influence women's intentions to use these new reproductive health technologies. Materials and
Methods: Participants (n = 327 US women) completed an online survey assessing perceptions related to both of these reproductive health technologies, including usefulness, ease of use, risk, trust, subjective norms, and personal responsibility, to learn about fertility.
Results: Participants indicated high perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, and trust, as well as low perceptions of risk and subjective norms for both online fertility consultations (OFCs) and reproductive hormone SCTs. Women indicated low perceptions of responsibility to use OFCs, but high perceptions of responsibility to use reproductive hormone SCTs. Structural equation modeling indicated that intentions to use OFCs were predicted by usefulness, subjective norms, and responsibility; intentions to use reproductive hormone SCTs were predicted by usefulness, ease of use, subjective norms, and responsibility. Conclusions: Fertility specialist consultations and reproductive hormone testing can provide women with essential fertility information that facilitates informed reproductive decisions; however, these services have historically been difficult to access. Widespread uptake of new reproductive health technologies could promote positive advances in women's reproductive health outcomes. © Amber K. Worthington et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fertility testing; online consultation; reproductive hormones; self-collection test; technology acceptance; telemedicine

Year:  2020        PMID: 33786505      PMCID: PMC7784726          DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2688-4844


  30 in total

1.  Trends in Fertility and Mother's Age at First Birth Among Rural and Metropolitan Counties: United States, 2007-2017.

Authors:  Danielle M Ely; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2018-10

2.  Public reaction to direct-to-consumer online genetic tests: Comparing attitudes, trust and intentions across commercial and conventional providers.

Authors:  Christine Critchley; Dianne Nicol; Margaret Otlowski; Don Chalmers
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2014-02-19

3.  Cultural factors contributing to health care disparities among patients with infertility in Midwestern United States.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; David B Seifer; Tarun Jain
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kate Grindlay; Todd Buchacker; Kathleen Lane; Kelly Blanchard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Reducing stigma in reproductive health.

Authors:  Rebecca J Cook; Bernard M Dickens
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  A randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa delivered via telemedicine versus face-to-face.

Authors:  James E Mitchell; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Scott Crow; Kathy Lancaster; Heather Simonich; Lorraine Swan-Kremeier; Christianne Lysne; Tricia Cook Myers
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-03-10

7.  Quantifying fertility? Direct-to-consumer ovarian reserve testing and the new (in)fertility pipeline.

Authors:  Moira A Kyweluk
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosure patterns, support and distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic.

Authors:  P Slade; C O'Neill; A J Simpson; H Lashen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Young people's views on the potential use of telemedicine consultations for sexual health: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Cameryn C Garrett; Jane Hocking; Marcus Y Chen; Christopher K Fairley; Maggie Kirkman
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Centring sexual and reproductive health and justice in the global COVID-19 response.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Goleen Samari; Samantha Garbers; Sara E Casey; Dazon Dixon Diallo; Miriam Orcutt; Rachel T Moresky; Micaela Elvira Martinez; Terry McGovern
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.