Literature DB >> 17580298

The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosure patterns, support and distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic.

P Slade1, C O'Neill, A J Simpson, H Lashen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A model suggesting that high perception of stigma is associated with reduced disclosure to others, leading to lower social support and higher distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic is tested.
METHODS: Questionnaires measuring stigmatization (Stigma consciousness questionnaire), disclosure of fertility difficulties (Disclosure questionnaire), social support (Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire) and fertility-related [Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI)] and generic distress [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)] were completed by 87 women and 64 men. Data were analysed by gender comparisons, correlations and path analysis.
RESULTS: Women reported higher stigma and disclosure than men. For women, stigma and disclosure were unrelated but in men higher stigma was associated with lower disclosure. Perceptions of stigma were related to low social support for both genders. Social support was negatively related to anxiety, depression and overall infertility distress and showed greater predictive capacity than satisfaction with partner relationship. Testing the model showed that, for men, stigma was linked to lower disclosure and support and higher fertility-related and generic distress. Disclosure itself did not link to support. For women, greater disclosure linked only to higher generic distress. Stigma was directly linked to fertility-related distress and to low perceived support which mediated a relationship with generic distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Stigma and the wider social context should be considered when supporting people with fertility problems. Greater disclosure may be associated with higher distress in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17580298     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  53 in total

1.  Predictors of quality of life and psychological health in infertile couples: the moderating role of duration of infertility.

Authors:  Maria Clelia Zurlo; Maria Francesca Cattaneo Della Volta; Federica Vallone
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Should there be a female age limit on public funding for assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Drew Carter; Amber M Watt; Annette Braunack-Mayer; Adam G Elshaug; John R Moss; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Concerns about treatment for infertility in a probability-based sample of US women.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen S Slauson-Blevins; Michele H Lowry; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  J Reprod Infant Psychol       Date:  2019-03-20

4.  Cancer-related tasks involving employment: opportunities for clinical assistance.

Authors:  Linda M Frazier; Virginia A Miller; Brigitte E Miller; Douglas V Horbelt; James E Delmore; Carolyn R Ahlers-Schmidt
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Oxidation-reduction potential of semen: what is its role in the treatment of male infertility?

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Kimberly B Bjugstad; Chak-Lam Cho
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 6.  The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen Slauson-Blevins; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2009-12-09

7.  Levels and associations among self-esteem, fertility distress, coping, and reaction to potentially being a genetic carrier in women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Ceylan Cizmeli; Marci Lobel; Jason Franasiak; Lisa M Pastore
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Women with spontaneous 46,XX primary ovarian insufficiency (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism) have lower perceived social support than control women.

Authors:  Susan A Orshan; June L Ventura; Sharon N Covington; Vien H Vanderhoof; James F Troendle; Lawrence M Nelson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Experimental methods to preserve male fertility and treat male factor infertility.

Authors:  Kathrin Gassei; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.